Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cancer Investigation Volume 32, 2014 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,041
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells in the Bethesda System 2001: A Comparison with the Histopathological Diagnosis of Surgically Resected Specimens

Tadahiro ShojiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Eriko TakatoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
,
Satoshi TakeuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
,
Akira YoshizakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
,
Noriyuki UesugiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
,
Tamotsu SugaiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
&
Toru SugiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
 show all
Pages 105-109 | Received 22 Jul 2013, Accepted 02 Jan 2014, Published online: 27 Feb 2014

REFERENCES

  • Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N; Forum Group Members. Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114–2119.
  • Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria and Explanatory Notes, 2nd edition. New York: Springer, 2003.
  • Davey DD, Neal MH, Wilbur DC, Colgan TJ, Styer PE, Mody DR. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1224–1229.
  • Zhao C, Florea A, Onisko A, Austin RM. Histologic follow-up results in 662 patients with pap test findings of atypical glandular cells: results from a large academic women's hospital laboratory employing sensitive screening methods. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:383–389.
  • Lee CY, Ng WK. Follow-up study of atypical glandular cells in gynecologic cytology using conventional Pap smears and liquid-based preparations: impact of the Bethesda System 2001. Acta Cytol 2008;52:159–168.
  • Goff BA, Atanasoff P, Brown E, Muntz HG, Bell DA, Rice LW. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:101–104.
  • Tam KF, Cheung AN, Liu KL, Ng TY, Pun TC, Chan YM, Wong LC, Ng AW, Ngan HY. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:603–607.
  • Krane JF, Lee KR, Sun D, Yuan L, Crum CP. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Outcome predictions based on human papillomavirus testing. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121:87–92.
  • Sawangsang P, Sae-Teng C, Suprasert P, Srisomboon J, Khunamornpong S, Kietpeerakool C. Clinical significant of atypical glandular cells on Pap smears: experience from a region with a high incidence of cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynecol Res 2011;37: 496–500.
  • Jadoon BA, Kehoe S, Romain K, Clelland C, Sundar SS. Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:83–85.
  • Lai CR, Hsu CY, Tsay SH, Li AF. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells by the 2001 Bethesda System in cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol 2008;52:563–567.
  • Westin MC, Derchain SF, Rabelo-Santos SH, Angelo-Andrade LA, Sarian LO, Oliveira E, Zeferino LC. Atypical glandular cells and adenocarcinoma in situ according to the Bethesda 2001 classification: cytohistological correlation and clinical implications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;139:79–85.
  • Sherman ME, Solomon D, Schiffman M. Qualification of ASCUS. A comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal HSIL cervical cytology in the ASCUS LSIL triage study. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:386–394.
  • Alves RR, Rabelo-Santos SH, Ribeiro AA, Carneiro MA, Ximenes Y, Tavares SB, Saddi V, Zeferino LC. Usefulness of repeat cytology at the time of first colposcopy. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:68–73.
  • Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D; 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11:201–222.
  • Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120–2129.
  • DeSimone CP, Day ME, Tovar MM, Dietrich CS 3rd, Eastham ML, Modesitt SC. Rate of pathology from atypical glandular cell Pap tests classified by the Bethesda 2001 nomenclature. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1285–1291.
  • Haidopoulos DA, Stefanidis K, Rodolakis A, Pilalis A, Symiakaki I, Diakomanolis E. Histologic implications of Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells. J Reprod Med 2005;50:539–542.
  • Kumar N, Bongiovanni M, Molliet MJ, Pelte MF, Egger JF, Pache JC. Reclassification and analysis of clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep using Bethesda 2001: Geneva experience. Swiss Med Wkly 2007;137:635–641.
  • Kumar N, Bongiovanni M, Molliet MJ, Pelte MF, Egger JF, Pache JC. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens. Cytopathology 2009;20:351–358.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.