Controversies in Mammography

References

• Young J L, Percy C L, Asire A J. Surveillance epidemiology, and end results: Incidence & mortality data: 1973-1977. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda 1981
   Google Scholar
• Mammography 1982. A Statement of the American Cancer Society. Ca-A Cancer Clin 1982; 32: 226–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warren S L. Roentgenalogic study of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 1930; 24: 113–124
   Google Scholar
• Ingelby H, Gershon-Cohen J. Comparative Anatomy, Pathology and Roentgenology of the Breast. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1960
   Google Scholar
• Leborgne R. Diagnosis of tumors of the breast by roentgenography: Calcifications in carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1951; 65: 1–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan R L. Experience with mammography in a tumor institution. Evaluation of 1,000 studies. Radiology 1960; 75: 894–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros C N. Methologie. Symposium sur le sein. U Radiol Electr 1967; 48: 638–655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ostrum B J, Becker W, Isard H J. Low-dose mammography. Radiology 1973; 109: 323–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J N. Xerography of the breast. Radiology 1968; 91: 231–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J E. Zero-mammography—An improved diagnostic method: Review of 250 biopsied cases. Am J Roentgenol 1973; 117: 90–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammography Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Washington, DC 1980, NCRP Report No. 66, 7910 Woodmont Avenue
   Google Scholar
• Anderson I, Hilldell J, et al. Number of projections in mammography: Influence on detection of breast disease. Am J Roentgenol 1978; 130: 349–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren B, Jakobsson S. Single-view mammography screening. Radiology 1979; 130: 109–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren B., Helleberg A. Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 68: 351–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombeck M J. Periodic breast cancer screening with single oblique-view mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983; 70: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan W W. Screen-film mammography technique: Compression and other factors. Reduced Dose Mammography, W W Logan, E P Muntz. Masson Publishing, New York 1979; 415–428
   Google Scholar
• Henderson M. Validity of screening. Cancer 1976; 35: 573–581
   Google Scholar
• Wynder E L, Bross I J, Hirayama T. A study of the epidemiology of cancer of the breast. Cancer 1960; 13: 559–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leis P L, Urban J A. The other breast. The Breast, H S Gallagher, H P Leis, Jr, R K Snyderman, J A Urban. CV Mosby Company, St. Louis 1978; 487–496
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey J L. A review of the epidemiology of breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1979; 1: 74–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins G F, Berg J W. Bilateral primary breast cancers: A prospective clinicopathological study. Cancer 1964; 17: 1501–1527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCredie J A, Inch W R, Alderson M. Consecutive primary carcinomas of the breast. Cancer 1975; 35: 1472–1477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillienfeld A M. The epidemiology of breast cancer. Cancer Res 1963; 23: 1503–1510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman H. Statistical and Epidemiological Data on Cancer of the Breast. American Cancer Society, New York 1972
   Google Scholar
• Lee J A, Chin P G, Kukull W A. Relationships of age to incidence of breast cancer in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1976; 57: 753–756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMahon B, Cole P, Lin T M, et al. Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull WHO 1970; 43: 209–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H H, Simons M, Davis J B. Cystic disease and carcinoma of the breast: Relationship to carcinoma. Cancer 1964; 17: 957–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodlin D, Winger E E, Morgenstern N L, et al. Chronic mastopathy and breast cancer. A follow up study. Cancer 1977; 39: 2603–2607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monson R R, Yen S, MacMahon B, et al. Chronic mastitis and carcinoma of the breast. Lancet 1976; 2: 224–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haagensen C D, Asch T. The classification of benign epithelial lesions of the breast. Breast Carcinoma Risk and Detection, C D Hagensen, C Bodian, D E Hagensen, Jr. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia 1981; 51–54
   Google Scholar
• Upton A C, Beebe G W, Brown J M, et al. Report of NCI Ad Hoc Working Group on the Risks Associated with Mammography in Mass Screening for Detection of Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 479–493
   Google Scholar
• Boice J D, Land C E, Shore R E. Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure. Radiology 1971; 131: 589–597
   Google Scholar
• Land C E, Boice J D, Shore R E. Breast cancer risk from low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation: Results of parallel analysis of three exposed populations of women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 65: 353–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablon S, Kato H. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. V. Radiation dose and mortality 1950-1970. Radiat Res 1972; 50: 649–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor D H, Land C E, Choi K, et al. Breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-1969. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 799–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga M, Norman J E, Assano M, et al. Malignant breast tumors among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-1974. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 1347–1359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler F A, Hempelmann L H, Dutton A M, et al. Breast neoplasms in women treated with x-rays for acute postpartum mastitis, a pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1969; 43: 803–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore R E, Hempelmann Kowoluk E, et al. Breast neoplasms in women treated with x-rays for acute postpartum mastitis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 59: 799–811
   Google Scholar
• Baral E, Larrson L E, Mattson B. Breast cancer following irradiation of the breast. Cancer 1977; 40: 2905–2910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice J D, Monson R B. Breast cancer following repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 823–832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I. Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies. Br J Cancer 1965; 19: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrden J A, Hiltz J E. Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies during artificial pneumothorax treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Can Med Assoc J 1969; 100: 1032–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrden J A, Quilan J J. Breast carcinoma following multiple fluoroscopies with pneumothorax treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Ann R Coll Phys Can 1974; 7: 45
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair W K. Effects of low level radiation and comparative risk. Radiology 1981; 138: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land C E. Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. Science 1980; 209: 1197–1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 1980, Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation: The effects on populations of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation
   Google Scholar
• Upton A C, Beebe G W, Brown J M, et al. Report of the NCI Ad Hoc Working Group on the Risks Associated with Mammography in Mass Screening for the Detection of Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 481–493
   Google Scholar
• Hammerstein G R, Miller D W, White D R, et al. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. Radiology 1979; 130: 485–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates L N, De Emidecki A J. Results of the Centers for Radiological Physics Measurements of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. Reduced Dose Mammography, W W Logan, E M Muntz. Masson, New York 1979; 123–130
   Google Scholar
• Muntz E P. On the relative carcinogenic effects of different mammography techniques. Med Phys 1979; 6: 205–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muntz E P, Wilkinson E, George F W. Mammography at reduced doses: Present performance and future possibilities. Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 741–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feig S A. Mammographic screening: Benefit and risk. Breast Carcinoma—Current Diagnosis and Treatment, S A Feig, R McLelland. Masson, New York 1983; 351–362
   Google Scholar
• Pochin E E. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 1978, Why be quantitative about radiation risk estimates? Lecture number 2: The Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture Series in Radiation in Protection and Measurements
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher H S, Martin J E. The study of mammary carcinoma by mammography and whole organ sectioning. Cancer 1969; 23: 855–873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch T. Mammography: A study of 500 patients. Am J Roentgenal Radium Ther Nucl Med 1963; 90: 366–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan R L. Results of 2000 mammograms. Cancer Bull 1962; 14: 105–108
   Google Scholar
• Clark R L, Copeland M, Egan R, Gallagher H. Reproducibility of the technique of mammography (Egan) for cancer of the breast. Am J Surg 1965; 109: 127–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts W T. Mammography and the diagnosis of cancer of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966; 122: 1077–1078
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shcpard D, Sodar P, Cooper D, et al. Mammography: An aid in the treatment of carcinome of the breast. Am Surg 1974; 179: 749–756
   Google Scholar
• Sokel E, Walker B, Terz J, et al. Role of mammography with palpable breast lesions. Surgery 1970; 67: 748–753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J N. Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. Am J Roentgen 1974; 121: 846–853
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H C. Mammography in diseases of the breast. The Breast, H S Gallagher, H P Leis, Jr, R K Snyderman, J A Urban. CV Mosby Company, St. Louis 1978; 98–120
   Google Scholar
• Haagensen C D, Asch T. Mammography in medical practice. Breast Carcinoma Risk and Detection, C D Haagensen, C Bodian, D E Haagensen, Jr. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia 1981; 475–500
   Google Scholar
• Strax P, Venct L, Shapiro S. Value of mammography in reduction of mortality from breast cancer in mass screening. Am J Roentgen 1973; 117: 686–689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro S. Evidence of screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer 1977; 39: 2772–2782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brcslow L., Henderson B E, Massey F J, et al. Report of NCI Ad Hoc Working Group of the Gross and Net Benefits of Mammography in Mass Screening for Detection of Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 473–478
   Google Scholar
• Breslow L, Thomas L B, Upton A C, et al. Final reports of the National Cancer Institute Ad Hoc Working Groups on Mammography in Screening for Breast Cancer and a summary report of their joint findings and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 467–541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas L B., Ackerman L V, McDivitt R W, et al. Report of National Cancer Institute Ad Hoc Pathology Working Group to Review the Gross and Microscopic Findings of Breast Cancer Cases in the HIP Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 495–541
   Google Scholar
• Baker L H. Breast Cancer Demonstration Project: Five-Year Summary Report. Ca-A Cancer Clin 1982; 32: 194–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer Patient Survival: Report Number 5. DHEW Pub No (NIH) 77-992, L M Axtell, A J Asire, et al. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 1976
   Google Scholar
• Wanebo H J., Huvous A G, et al. Treatment of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 1974; 33: 349–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier T G, Copeland E M, et al. Prognosis and treatment in minimal breast cancer. Am J Surg 1977; 133: 697–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemoto T, Vana J, Bedwoni R N, et al. Management and survival of female breast cancer: Results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer 1980; 45: 2917–2924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos J L. Observations on the mortality from carcinome of the breast. Br J Radiol 1972; 45: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters T G, Donegan W L, Burg E A. Minimal breast cancer: A clinical appraisal. Ann Surg 1977; 186: 704–710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevin J E, Pinzon G, Moran T J, et al. Minimal breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 1980; 139: 357–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher H S, Martin J E. Early phases in the development of breast cancer. Cancer 1969; 24: 1170–1178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher H S, Martin J E. An orientation to the concept of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 1971; 28: 1505–1507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher H S. Minimal breast cancer: Results of treatment and long term follow up. Breast Carcinoma—Current Diagnosis and Treatment, S A Feig, R McLelland. Masson, New York 1983; 291–294
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz M. Screening is not diagnosis. Radiology 1979; 133: 265–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz M, Gartside P S. Evidence of breast cancer mortality reduction: Aggressive screening in women under age 50. Am J Roentgen 1982; 138: 911–916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feig S A, Schwartz G I, Nerlinger B S, et al. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination. Radiology 1979; 133: 577–582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar J C. Screening for early breast cancer: Pro's and Con's. Cancer 1977; 39: 2783–2795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar J C. Mammography: A contrary view. Anal Intern Med 1976; 84: 77–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar J C. Mammographic screening: A reappraisal of benefits and risks. Clin Obstect Gynecol 1978; 21: 1–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox S H, Moskowitz M, Saenger E L, et al. Benefit/risk analysis of aggressive mammographic screening. Radiology 1978; 128: 350–365
   Google Scholar
• Eddy D M. Screening for Cancer: Theory Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1980
   Google Scholar
• Seidman H. Screening for breast cancer in younger women, life expectancy gains and losses: An analysis according to risk indicator groups. Cancer 1977; 27: 66–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaccierini R P, Lundin F E. Risk benefit analysis for reduced dose mammography. Reduced Dose Mammography, W W Logan, E P Muntz. Masson Publishing, New York 1979; 61–72
   Google Scholar
• Feig S A. Mammographic screening benefits and risks. Breast Carcinoma—Current Diagnosis and Treatment, S A Feig, R McLelland. Masson, New York 1983; 351–369
   Google Scholar
• Feig S A. Assessment of the hypothetical risk from mammography and evaluation of the potential benefits. Radiol Clin N Am 1983; 21: 173–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz M. Benefit and risk. Mammography: Thermography and Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Detection, L W Bassett, R H Gold. Grune and Stratton, New York 1982; 129–140
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath J R, Moskowitz M, Bauermeister D E. Breast cancer screening. CRC Crit Rev Diag Imaging 1981; 16: 181–218
   Google Scholar
• Smart C R, Behars O H. Breast cancer screening results as viewed by the clinician. Cancer 1979; 48: 851–856
   Google Scholar
• Behars O H, Shapiro S, Smart C, et al. Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 639–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behars O H, Shapiro S, Smart C, et al. Supplemental and concluding report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 699–709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health-National Cancer Institute Consensus Development Meeting on Breast Cancer Screening: Issues and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978; 60: 1519–1521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statement on recommendations of the Consensus Development Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978; 60: 1523–1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman H, Stellman S D, Mushinski M H. A different perspective on breast cancer risk factors: Some implications of the nonattributable risk. Cancer 1982; 32: 3–15
   Google Scholar
• Tabar L, Gad A. Screening for breast cancer: The Swedish Trial. Radiology 1981; 138: 219–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabar L, Gad A, Aberlund E, . Screening for breast cancer in Sweden. Breast Carcinomas Current Diagnosis and Treatment, S A Feig, R McLelland, et al. Masson, New York 1983; 315–326
   Google Scholar
• Baines C J, Miller A B. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Why it deserves support. Can Fam Physician 1982; 28: 481–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A B. The National Breast Screening Study: An opportunity for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 1982; 28: 369–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammagraphy Guidelines 1983. Background statement and update of Cancer-Related Checkup Guidelines for breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women age 40-49. Cancer 1983; 33: 255–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar