Screening for the Early Detection of Cancer

References

• Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease, Public Health Paper No. 34. World Health Organization, Geneva 1968
   Google Scholar
• Screening for Disease. A series from the Lancet October 5-December 21, 1974
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Holland WW. Controversy in the detection of disease. Lancet 1975; 2: 357–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summary and general recommendations. Screening in Cancer, AB Miller. UICC Technical Report Series, Geneva 1978; Volume 40: 334–338
   Google Scholar
• Thorner RM, Remein QR. Principles and Procedures in the Evaluation of Screening for Disease, Public Health Monograph No. 67. U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C. 1961
   Google Scholar
• Buck AA, Gart JJ. Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies: I. Indices of agreement and their relation to prevalence. Am J Epidemiol 1966; 83: 586–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gart JJ, Buck AA. Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies: II. A probabilistic model for the comparison of diagnostic tests. Am J Epidemiol 1966; 83: 593–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld AM. Some limitations and problems of screening for cancer. Cancer (Suppl) 1974; 33: 1720–1724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole P, Morrison AS. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 64: 1263–1272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelen M, Feinleib M. On the theory of screening for chronic diseases. Biometrika 1969; 56: 601–614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prorok PC. The theory of periodic screening I: Lead time and proportion detected. Adv Appl Prob 1976; 8: 127–143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prorok PC. The theory of periodic screening II: Doubly bounded recurrence times and mean lead time and detection probability estimation. Adv Appl Prob 1976; 8: 460–476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz M. A mathematical model used to analyze breast cancer screening strategies. Oper Res 1978; 26: 937–955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz M. An analysis of the benefits of serial screening for breast cancer based upon a mathematical model for the disease. Cancer 1978; 41: 1550–1564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert A, Gertman P, Louis T. Screening for the early detection of cancer-I: The temporal natural history of a progressive disease state. Math Biosci 1978; 40: 1–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert A, Gertman P, Louis T. Screening for the early detection of cancer-II: The impact of screening on the natural history of the disease. Math Biosci 1978; 40: 61–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenson LE. When is screening effective in reducing the death rate. Math Biosci 1976; 30: 273–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenson LE. Detection of disease with periodic screening: Transient analysis and application to mammography examination. Math Biosci 1977; 33: 73–106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox EG. A simulation system for screening procedures. The Future and Present Indicatives, Problems and Progress in Medical Care, Ninth Series, G McLachlan. Oxford University Press, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London 1973; 17–55
   Google Scholar
• Oortmarssen GJV, Habbema JDF, Lubbe JTN. Predicting effects of mass screening for disease: A simulation approach. Eur J Oper Res 1981; 6: 399–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prorok PC. Evaluation of screening programs for the early detection of cancer. Statistical Methods for Cancer Studies, RG Cornell. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 1984; 267–328
   Google Scholar
• Zelen M. Theory of early detection of breast cancer in the general population. Breast Cancer: Trends in Research and Treatment, JC Heuson, WH Mattheiem, M. Rozenzweig. Raven Press, New York 1976; 287–300
   Google Scholar
• Bailar JC. Mammography: a contrary view. Ann Intern Med 1976; 84: 77–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison AS. Case definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 6–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss NS. Control definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening and diagnostic testing. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 457–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General principles on evaluation of screening for cancer. Screening for Cancer I-General Principles on Evaluation of Screening for Cancer and Screening for Lung, Bladder and Oral Cancer, PC Prorok, AB Miller. UICC Technical Report Series, Geneva 1984; Volume 78: 3–4
   Google Scholar
• Clarke EA, Anderson TW. Does screening by Pap smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study. Lancet 1979; 2: 1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrino F, Gatta G, D'Atto M. Use of case-control studies in evaluation of screening programs. Screening for Cancer I-General Principles on Evaluation of Screening for Cancer and Screening for Lung, Bladder and Oral Cancer, PC Prorok, AB Miler. UICC Technical Report Series, Geneva 1984; Volume 78: 29–43
   Google Scholar
• Aristizabal N, Cuello C, Correa P. The impact of vaginal cytology on cervical cancer risks in Cali, Columbia. Int J Cancer 1984; 34: 5–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. Lancet 1984; 1: 1222–1224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collette HJA, Day NE, Rombach JJ. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomized study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet 1984; 1: 1224–1226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byar DP, Simon RM, Friedewald WT. Randomized clinical trials: Perspectives on some recent ideas. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 74–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer 1976; 34: 585–612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient, n. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1976; 35: 1–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderman MA. Looking backward: Is it worth the crick in the neck? Or: Pitfalls in using retrospective data. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 1966; 96: 230–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert V. Acquiring new information while retaining old ethics. Science 1977; 198: 690–693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson M. Validity of screening. Cancer (Suppl) 1976; 37: 573–581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan study: A randomized trial with breast cancer screening. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; 67: 65–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beahrs OH, Shapiro S, Smart C. Report of the working group to review the NCI-ACS breast cancer detection demonstration projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 639–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. Periodic examination of patients at risk. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Current Concepts, D Schottenfeld. Charles C Thomas, Springfield 1975; 437–454
   Google Scholar
• Thomas LB, Ackerman LV, McDivitt RW. Report of NCI ad hoc pathology working group to review the gross and microscopic findings of breast cancer cases in the HIP study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 495–541
   Google Scholar
• Morrison AS. The effects of early treatment, lead time and length bias on the mortality experienced by cases detected by screening. Int J Epidemiol 1982; 11: 261–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakama M. Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. Trends in Cancer Incidence, Causes and Practical Implications, K Magnus. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York 1982; 279–292
   Google Scholar
• Day NE. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 714–718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakama M, Chamberlain J, Day NE. Evaluation of screening programs for gynecological cancer. Br J Cancer 1985; 52: 669–673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVecchia C, Franceschi S, Decarli A. Pap smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: Quantitative estimates from a case-control study. Lancet 1984; 2: 779–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines for the cancer-related check-up: Recommendations and rationale. CA 1980; 30: 191–240
   Google Scholar
• Cervical cancer screening programs: Summary of the 1982 Canadian task force report. Can Med Assn J 1982; 127: 581–589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dales LG, Friedman GD, Collen MF. Evaluating periodic multiphasic health check-ups: A controlled trial. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 385–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison AS. Screeningin Chronic Disease. Oxford University Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertsen VA. Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer. Cancer 1974; 34: 936–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM. The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 1978; 41: 1137–1139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz RE. Value of periodic examinations in detecting cancer of the colon and rectum. Postgrad Med 1960; 27: 290–294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fruchmorgen P, Demling L. Early detection of colorectal cancer with a modified guaiac test—A screening examination of 6,000 humans. Progress in Cancer Research and Therapy, Volume 13, Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening, S Winawer, D Schottenfeld, P Sherlock. Raven Press, New York 1980; 311–315
   Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Miller DO. Introduction: Screening approaches based on risk. Progress in Cancer Research and Therapy, Volume 13, Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening, S Winawer, D Schottenfeld, P Sherlock. Raven Press, New York 1980; 159–165
   Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Andrews M, Miller EH. Review of screening for colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood testing. Progress in Cancer Research and Therapy, Volume 13, Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening, S Winawer, D Schottenfeld, P Sherlock. Raven Press, New York 1980; 249–259
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle JD, Farrands PA, Balfour TW. Controlled trial of fecal occult blood tesing in the detection of colorectal cancer. Lancet 1983; 1: 1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Leidner SD, Miller DD. Results of a screening program for early detection of colon cancer and polyps using fecal occult blood testing. Gastroenterology 1977; 72(A-127)1150
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertsen VA, McHugh RB, Schuman LM. Colon cancer control study: An interim report. Progress in Cancer Research and Treatment, Volume 13, Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening, S Winawer, D. Schottenfeld, P Sherlock. Raven Press, New York 1980; 261–266
   Google Scholar
• Cnuong JJH. A screening primer: Basic principles, criteria, and pitfalls of screening with comments on colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 1983; 5: 229–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JW. Occult-blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: The benefits. Am J Prev Med 1985; 1: 3–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: A critical review. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 820–837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consensus conclusions and recommendations. Screening and Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, DR Brodie. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, DC 1979; 1–3, NIH Publication No. 80–2075
   Google Scholar
• Fink DJ. Facts about colorectal cancer detection. CA 1983; 33: 366–367
   Google Scholar
• Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet 1985; 1: 829–832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C. The national study of breast cancer screening. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4: 227–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group. Trial of early detection of breast cancer: Description of method. Br J Cancer 1981; 44: 618–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ. The Edinburgh randomized trial of screening for breast cancer: Description of method. Br J Cancer 1984; 50: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AB, Bulbrook RD. Screening, detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Lancet 1982; 1: 1109–1111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Consensus Development Meeting on Breast Cancer Screening: Issues and Recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978; 60: 1519–1521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammography 1982: A Statement of the American Cancer Society. CA 1982; 32(4)
   Google Scholar
• Mammography Guidelines 1983: Background statement and update of cancer-related check-up guidelines for breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women age 40 to 49. CA 1983; 33(4)
   Google Scholar
• Boucot KR, Weiss W. Is curable lung cancer detected by semiannual screening. J Am Med Assoc 1973; 224: 1361–1365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld A, Archer PG, Burnett CH. An evaluation of radiologic and cytologic screening for the early detection of lung cancer: A cooperative pilot study of the American Cancer Society and the Veterans Administration. Cancer Res 1966; 26: 2083–2121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash FA, Morgan JM, Tomkins JG. South London lung cancer study. Br Med J 1968; 2: 715–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett GZ. Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancer. Br Med J 1969; 4: 260–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana RS. Screening for lung cancer. Screening for Cancer, AB Miller. Academic Press, Inc., New York 1985; 377–395
   Google Scholar
• Levin ML, Tockman MS, Frost JK. Lung cancer mortality in males screened by chest X-ray and cytologic sputum examination: A preliminary report. Rec Res Cancer Res 1982; 82: 138–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melamed MR, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB. Screening for early lung cancer, results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York. Chest 1984; 86: 44–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink DJ, Upton AC. Consensus conference on screening for lung cancer. National Cancer Program Special Communication April 19, 1979
   Google Scholar