References
- LaValle D. September 23, 1991, General Electric Company: Personal communication
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Office Mammography, ACOG Committee Opinion, No. 95—August 1991
- U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC June, 1989, Physician Payment Review Commission: The Costs of Providing Screening Mammography, Report to Congress No.98–2
- U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: Breast Cancer Screening for Medicare Beneficiaries: Effectiveness, Costs to Medicare and Medical Resources Requires-Staff Paper. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC November, 1987
- Brown ML., Kessler LG., Rueter FG. Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand?. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113(10)547–552
- Brown ML., Kessler LG. The geographical distribution of screening mammography resources. December, 1989, NCI working paper
- Chartbook on Health Care in Rural America (background paper). Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC October, 1990, U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment
- Screening Mammography: Low-Cost Services Do Not Compromise Quality. GAO, Washington, DC January, 1990, U.S. Congress, General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-90–32
- Kopans D. September 20, 1991, Massachusetts General Hospital: Personal communication
- NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium: Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity. JAMA 1990; 264: 54–58
- Schwartz JS., Lewis CE., Clancy C, et al. Internists' practices in health promotion and disease prevention. An Intern Med 1991; 114: 46–53
- Ware A. September 25, 1991, Spectrascan Imaging Services: Personal communication
- JB. Mittan. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Comprehensive Health Planning, 1991 Florida Health Care Atlas, Tallahassee, FL 1991, HRS Office of Comprehensive Health Planning
- Nelson C. October 11, 1991, National Center for Health Statistics: Unpublished data from the National Ambulatory Care Survey
- McLelland R, Hendrick RE., Zinninger MD., et al. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157(9)473–479
- August 31, 1991, American College of Radiology: Mammography Accreditation Program
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration. State Operations Manual. Baltimore, MD January, 1991, HCFA-Pub.7
- Hendrick RE. September 25, 1991, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center: Personal communication
- Meyer JE. September 25, 1991, Women's & Brigham Hospital, Boston: Personal communication
- Meyer JE., Eberlin TJ., Somper PC., Sonnefeld MR. Biopsy of occult breast lesions: Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. JAMA 1990; 263: 2341–2343
- The Quality of Medical Care: Information for Consumers. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC June, 1988, U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-H-386
- Brown M. Quality assurance and related activities in mammography: Economic issues. presented to NCI Breast Imaging Workshop: State-of-the-Art and New Technologies, Bethesda, MD, September, 41991
- Urban N. September 23, 1991, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA: Personal communication
- Spectrascan Imaging Services: Benefits for Your Patients and Practice. 1988
- Spectrascan Imaging Services, sales literature. 1991
- Dougherty D, Gluck M, Power E. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Charges for breast cancer screening and effectiveness of biennial screening, internal staff memorandum. March, 71988
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease. Control: MMWR 1989; 38: 137–140