Advances in Ethanol Production using Immobilized Cell Systems

References

• Martin S. R. The production of fuel ethanol from carbohydrates. Chem. Eng. 50, February 1982
   Google Scholar
• Villet R. Biotechnical research and development for biomass conversion to chemicals and fuels. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1981; 21: 97
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Vogrinetz J. Substrate availability and economics of ethanol fermentation. Abstr. 6th Int. Fermentation Symp., 1980, London, Ontario, Canada. 1980
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson B., Black G. M., Pinches A. Process intensification using cell support systems. Process Biochem., 24 May, 1980
   Google Scholar
• Maiorella B., Wilke C. R., Blanch H. W. Alcohol production and recovery. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1981; 21: 43
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. Yeast for molasses alcohol. Process Biochem. 1976; 11(3)10
   Google Scholar
• Bullock J. D., Comberbach D. M. A practical system for high productivity ethanol fermentation,Abstr. Commun.: 2nd European Cong. Biotechnol. Eastbourne, England, 204. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Dawson P. S. Continuous fermentations. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes, D. Perlman. Academic Press, New York 1977; Vol. 1: 73
   Google Scholar
• Hospodka J. Industrial applications of continuous fermentations. Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Continuous Culture of Microorganisms, I. Malek, Z. Fencl. Academic Press, New York 1966; 495
   Google Scholar
• Rosen K. Continuous production of alcohol. Process Biochem. 1978; 13(5)25
   Google Scholar
• Yarovenko V. L. Theory and practice of continuous cultivation of microorganisms in industrial alcoholic processes. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1978; 9: 1
   Google Scholar
• Hough J. S., Button A. H. Continuous brewing. Progress in Industrial Microbiology, D. J. D. Hockenhull. Churchill Livingstone, London 1972; Vol. 11: 89
   Google Scholar
• Cysewski G. R., Wilke C. R. Utilization of cellulosic materials through enzymatic hydrolysis. I. Fermentation of hydrolyzate to ethanol and single cell protein. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1976; 18: 1297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cysewski G. R., Wilke C. R. Rapid ethanol fermentations using vacuum and cell recycle. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977; 19: 1125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cysewski G. R., Wilke C. R. Process design and economic studies of alternative fermentation methods for the production of ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1978; 20: 1421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose T. K., Tyagi R. D. Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolyzate. II. Product and substrate inhibition and optimization of fermenter design. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 179; 21: 1401
   Google Scholar
• Ramalingham A., Finn R. K. The vacuferm process: a new approach to fermentation alcohol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977; 19: 583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swings J., Deley J. The biology of. Zymomonas, Bacterial. Rev. 1977; 41: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers P. L., Lee K. J., Tribe D. E. The kinetics of alcohol production byZymomonas mobilisat high sugar concentrations. Biotechnol. Lett. 1979; 1: 165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers P. L., Lee K. J., Tribe D. E. High productivity ethanol fermentations with. Zymomonas mobilis, Process Biochem., August/September, 7 1980
   Google Scholar
• Rogers P. L., Lee K. J., Skotnicki M. L., Tribe D. E. Ethanol fermentation by highly productive strains ofZymomonas mobilis. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 2: 189
   Google Scholar
• Lee K. J., Tribe D. E., Rogers P. L. Ethanol production byZymomonas mobilisin continuous culture at high glucose concentrations. Biotechnol. Lett. 1979; 1: 421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K. J., Skotnicki M. L., Tribe D. E., Rogers P. L. Kinetic studies on a highly productive strain of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K. J., Lefebvre M., Tribe D. E., Rogers P. L. High productivity ethanol fermentations withZymomonas mobilisusing continuous cell recycle. Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavers B. H., Pang P., Mackenzie C. R., Lawford G. R., Pik J. R., Lawford H. G. Industrial alcohol production by high performance bacterial fermentation. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 2: 195
   Google Scholar
• Skotnicki M. L., Tribe D. E., Rogers P. L. R-Plasmid transfer in. Zymomonas mobilis, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980; 40: 7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnicki M. L., Warr R. G., Goodman A. E., Rogers P. L. Development of genetic techniques and strain improvement in Zymomonas mobilis. Abstr. – 4th Int. Symp. on Genetics of Industrial Microorganisms, June 6, Kyoto, Japan. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Dally E. L., Stokes H. W., Eveleigh D. E. Use of recombinant DNA for enhancing ethanol production in the bacteriumZymomonas mobilis. paper presented at the 184th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Kansas City, September. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Rogers P. L., Lee K. J., Skotnicki M. L., Tribe D. E. Ethanol production by. Zymomonas mobilis, Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1982; 23: 37
   Google Scholar
• Abbott B. J. Immobilized cells. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes, D. Perlman. Academic Press, New York 1977; Vol. 1: 205
   Google Scholar
• Venkatsubramanian K., Veith W. R. Immobilized Microbial Cells. Progress in Industrial Microbiology, M. J. Bull. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam 1980; Vol. 15
   Google Scholar
• Messing R. A. Immobilized microbes. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes, D. Perlman, G. T. Tsao. Academic Press, New York 1980; Vol. 4
   Google Scholar
• Chibata I. Development of enzyme engineering – application of immobilized cell system. Food Process Engineering, P. Linko, J. Larinkari. Applied Science Publishers, London 1979; Vol. 2: 1
   Google Scholar
• Linko P. Immobilized biological systems for continuous fermentation. Food Process Engineering, P. Linko, J. Larinkari. Applied Science Publishers, London 1979; Vol. 2.: 27
   Google Scholar
• Abbott B. J. Immobilized cells. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes, D. Perlman. Academic Press, New York 1978; Vol. 2: 91
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham P. S. J. Developments in the immobilization of microbial cells and their applications. Topics in Enzyme and Fermentation Biotechnology, A. Wiseman. Ellis Horwood Ltd., ChichesterEngland 1979; Vol. 4: 189
   Google Scholar
• Jack T. R., Zajic J. E. The Immobilization of Whole Cells, Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1977; 5: 125
   Google Scholar
• Kolot F. B. Immobilized microbial systems: present state of development. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1980; 21: 295
   Google Scholar
• Durand G., Navarro J. M. Immobilized microbial cells. Process Biochem. 14, September 1978
   Google Scholar
• Messing R. A. Support-bound microbial cells. Appl. Biochem. BioiechnoL 1981; 6: 167
   Google Scholar
• Koshcheenko K. A. Living immobilized cells as Biocatalysis of Transformation and Biosynthesis of Organic Compounds. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 1981; 17: 351
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G. Production of ethanol by immobilized yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwanhoek 1979; 45: 687
   Google Scholar
• Leduy A., Marsan A. A., Coupal B. A study of the rheological properties of a non-newtonian fermentation broth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1974; 16: 61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin J. P., Filip Z., Haider K. Effect of montmorillonite and humate on growth and metabolic activity of some actinomycetes. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1976; 8: 409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbart W., Engelbart F. Apparatus and Method for Optimizing Chemical Reactions and Biological Fermentations. U.S. Patent. 1975; 3: 880–716
   Google Scholar
• Engelbart W., Pose H., Dellweg H. Mass Transfer in Adhesive Fermentation. Absir. – 5th Int. Fermentation Symp. Berlin 1976; 60
   Google Scholar
• Delbruck M. Schnellgärung und das Arbeiten mit gefesselfor Hefe. Wochenschr. Brau. 1892; 9: 645
   Google Scholar
• Barbet E. French Patent. 1899
   Google Scholar
• Portno A. D. Theoretical and practical aspects of continuous fermentation. Wallerstein Lab. Commun. 1970; 33: 149
   Google Scholar
• Prince I. G., McCann D. J. The continuous fermentation of starches and sugars to ethyl alcohol. Alcohol Fuels Symp., Sydney, 9–11 August 1978
   Google Scholar
• Berdelle-Hilge Ph. Continuous treatment of liquids in fermentative processes with enzymes by passing them through enzyme retaining porous structures. German patent 1966; 1: 517–814
   Google Scholar
• Berdelle-Hilge Ph. Fesselgärung-Ein Beltrag zur Vorgeschichte des Bio-Reaktors. Brauwelt 1972; 112(3)24
   Google Scholar
• Berdelle-Hilge Ph. Wort under hydraulic pressure passed through a layer of yeast. U.S. Patent 3; 737(323)1973
   Google Scholar
• Narziss L., Hellich P. A study on considerably accelerated fermentation and conditioning of beer. Brauwelt 1971; 111: 1491
   Google Scholar
• Narziss L., Hellich P. Rapid fermentation and maturing of beer by means of the bio-reactor. Brewers Digest Sept., 1972; 106
   Google Scholar
• Baker D. A., Kirsop B. H. Rapid beer production and conditioning using a plug fermenter. J. Inst. Brewing 1973; 79: 487
   Google Scholar
• Grinbergs M., Hildebrand R. P., Clarke B. J. Continuous fermentations of glucose solutions. J. Inst. Brewing 1977; 83: 25
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt P., Gallup D. M. Dialysis flask for concentrated culture of microorganisms. J. Bacterial. 1963; 86: 919
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz J. S., Gerhardt P. Dialysis culture of microorganisms: design, theory and results. Bacterial. Rev. 1969; 33: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsop B. H. Oxygen in brewery fermentations. J. Inst. Brewing 1973; 80: 252
   Google Scholar
• Kirsop B. H. Aeration in fermentation for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1981; 3: 375
   Google Scholar
• Nagodawithana T. W. Factors Influencing Rates of Fermentation and Retention of Viability of Cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Rapid Fermentations. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, February. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Nagodawithana T. W., Castellano C., Steinkraus K. H. Effect of dissolved oxygen, temperature, initial cell count, and sugar concentration on the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaein rapid fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. 1974; 28: 383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagodawithana T. W., Steinkraus K. H. Influence of the rate of ethanol production and accumulation on the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaein “Rapid Fermentation”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1976; 31: 158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sortland L. D., Wilke C. R. Growth ofStreptococcus faecalisin dense culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1969; 11: 805
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margaritis A. A Study of the Rotorfermenter and the Kinetics of Ethanol Fermentatipn, Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley, July, 1975 Also as The Lawrence Berkeley Lab Report, LBL-3278. 1975
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Wilke C. R. Engineering Analysis of the Rotorfermenter. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1972; 13: 159
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Wilke C. R. The rotorfermenter. I. description of the apparatus, power requirements, and mass transfer characteristics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1978; 20: 709
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Wilke C. R. The rotorfermenter. II. application to ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1978; 20: 727
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraldson A., Rosen C. G. Studies on continuous ethanol fermentation of sugar cane molasses. I. A solution for continuous fermentation. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 14: 216
   Google Scholar
• Haraldson A., Rosen C. G. Studies on continuous ethanol fermentation of sugarcane molasses. II. Continuous alcohol fermentation and product removal in a laboratory scale plant. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 14: 220
   Google Scholar
• Wilke C. R., Maiorella B. High productivity anaerobic fermentation with dense cell culture. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 1: 539
   Google Scholar
• Dostalek M., Haggstrom M. A filter fermenter-apparatus and control equipment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 2077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson B. The role of microbial films in fermentation. Microbial Engineering, Z. Sterbacek. Butterworths, London 1973; 279
   Google Scholar
• Daniels S. L. The adsorption of microorganisms onto solid surfaces: a review. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1972; 13: 211
   Google Scholar
• Nordin J. S., Tsuchiya H. M., Fredrickson A. G. Interfacial phenomena governing adhesion ofChlorellato glass surfaces. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1967; 9: 545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolot F. B. New trends in yeast technology – immobilized cells. Process Biochem. Oct./Nov., 1980; 2
   Google Scholar
• Kolot F. B. Microbial carriers – strategy for selection, – Part 1. Process Biochem. Aug./Sept., 1981; 2
   Google Scholar
• Kolot F. B. Microbial carriers – strategy for selection, – Part 2. Process Biochem. Oct./Nov., 1981; 30
   Google Scholar
• Marcipar A., Cochet N., Brackenridge L., Lebeault J. M. Immobilization of yeasts on ceramic supports. Biotechnol. Lett. 1979; 1: 65
   Google Scholar
• Thonart Ph., Custinne M., Paquot M. Zeta Potential of yeast cells: application in cell immobilization. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1982; 4: 191
   Google Scholar
• Michaux M., Paquot M., Baijot B., Thonart Ph. Continuous fermentation: improvement of cell immobilization by Zeta potential measurement. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. No. 12 1982; 475
   Google Scholar
• Maignon C., Navarro J. M., Durand G. Activity mdtabolique de microorganismes retenus par des suports solides. Oecol. Plant. 1974; 9: 365
   Google Scholar
• Moo-Young M., Lamptey J., Robinson C. W. Immobilization of yeast cells on various supports for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 541
   Google Scholar
• Gencer M. A., Mutharasan R. Ethanol fermentation in a yeast immobilized column fermenter. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. I.: 627
   Google Scholar
• Kolpakchi A. P., Isaeva V. S., Zhvirblyanskaya A. Yu., Kazantsev E. N., Serova E. N., Rattel N. N. Binding of brewing yeasts to polymeric materials. Appl. Biochem., Microbiol. 1976; 12: 703
   Google Scholar
• Rotman B. Use of ion exchange resins in microbiology. Bacteriol. Rev. 1960; 24: 251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messing R. A., Oppermann R. A. Pore dimensions for accumulating biomass. I. Microbes that reproduce by fission or by budding. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1979; 21: 49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing R. A., Oppermann R. A., Kolot F. B. Pore dimensions for accumulating biomass. Immobilized Microbial Celts, K. Venkatsubramanian. ACS Symposium Series No. 106. 1979; 13
   Google Scholar
• Corrieu G., Blachere H., Ramirez A., Navarro J. M., Durand G., Duteutre B., Moll M. An immoblized yeast fermentation pilot plant used for production of beer. Abstr.: 5th Int. Fermentation Symp. Berlin. 1976
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J. M., Durand G., Duteutre B., Moll M., Corrieu G. Demonstration of a continuous procedure for the preparation of fermented beverages. Ind. Aliment. Agric. 1976; 93: 695
   Google Scholar
• Moll M. Continuous brewing of beer. U.S. Patent No. 4 1977; 009: 286
   Google Scholar
• Robinson C. W., Moo-Young M., Lamptey J. Ethanol production by immobilized yeasts cells in a packed tower. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 2: 105
   Google Scholar
• Lamptey J., Robinson C. W., Moo-Young M. Kinetics of Fuel-Grade Ethanol Production in an Immobilized Yeast Packed-Bed Bioreactor. Proc. 2nd World Cong, of Chem. Eng., 4–10 October,1981 Montreal, Canada. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Aiba S., Shoada M., Nagatani M. Kinetics of product-inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1968; 10: 845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu V. W., Navarro J. M., Durand G. Comparative study of ethanol production by an immobilized yeast in a tubular reactor and in a multistage reactor. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 15: 1
   Google Scholar
• Daugulis A. J., Brown N. M., Cluett W. R., Dunlop D. B. Production of ethanol by adsorbed yeast cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 651
   Google Scholar
• Ghose T. K., Bandyopadhyay K. K. Rapid ethanol fermentation in immobilized yeast cell reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980; 22: 1489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose T. K., Bandyopadhyay K. K. Rapid ethanol fermentation by immobilized whole cells. Proc. 2nd World Cong, of Chem. Eng., 4–10 October, 1981 Montreal, Canada. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Ghose T. K., Bandyopadhyay K. K. Studies on immobilizedSaccharomyces cerevisiae.II. Effect of temperature distribution on continuous rapid ethanol formation in molasses fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyagi R. D., Chose T. K. Studies on immobilizedSaccharomyces cerevisiae.1. Analysis of continuous rapid ethanol fermentation in immobilized cell reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Mena R., Ribaud J. A., Humphrey A. E. Demonstration of Process Feasibility for Continuous Extraction of Alcohols from Fermenting Systems. Abstr. – 6th Int. Fermentation Symp., 20–25 July. 1980, London, Ontario, Canada. 1980
   Google Scholar
• Hartline F. F. Lowering the cost of ethanol. Science October 5, 1979; 41: 206
   Google Scholar
• Minier M., Goma G. Production of ethanol by coupling fermentation and solvent extraction. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 405
   Google Scholar
• Minier M., Goma G. Ethanol production by extractive fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcuri E. J., Worden R. M., Shumate S. E. Ethanol production by immobilized cells of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcuri E. J. Continuous ethanol production and ceil growth in an immobilized – cell bioreactor employing. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyde R. Horizontal fibre fermenter. Trends in the Biology of Fermentations for Fuels and Chemicals, A. Hoilaender. Plenum Press, New York 1981; 547
   Google Scholar
• Scott C. D., Hancher C. W., Arcuri E. J. Tapered fluidized bed bioreactors for environmental control and fuel production. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; 651
   Google Scholar
• Bland R. R., Chen H. C., Jewell W. J., Bellamy W. D., Zall R. R. Continuous high rate production of ethanol byZymomonas mobilisin an attached film expanded bed fermenter. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H. C., Zall R. R. Continuous fermentation of whey into alcohol using an attached film expanded bed reactor. Process Biochem Jan/Feb., 1982; 20
   Google Scholar
• Griffith W. L., Compere A. L. New Fixed-Film Process for the Production of High Levels of Ethanol. Presented at theConf. on Energy Prod, from Organic Wastes and Its Utilization19–21 September, 1974, Madison, Wisconsin. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Griffith W. L., Compere A. L. A new method for coating fermentation tower packing so as to facilitate microorganism attachment. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1976; 17: 241
   Google Scholar
• Sitton O. C., Gaddy J. L. Ethanol production in an immobilized cell reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980; 22: 1735
   Google Scholar
• Sitton O. C., Magruder G. C., Book N. L., Gaddy J. L. Comparison of immobilized cell reactor and CSTR for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 10 1980; 213
   Google Scholar
• Sitton O. C., Magruder G. C., Gaddy J. L. Production of ethanol with immobilized. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, inAdvances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 2: 231
   Google Scholar
• Gainer J. L., Kirwan D. J., Foster J. A., Seyhan E. Use of adsorbed and covalently bound microbes in reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. No. 10 1980; 43
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J. M., Durand G. Modification of yeast metabolism by immobilization onto porous glass. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1977; 4: 243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay K. K., Ghose T. K. Studies on immobilizedSaccharomyces cerevisiae.III. Physiology of growth and metabolism on various supports. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 805
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi M., Marcipar A., Segard E., Broun G. B. Matrix-bound transition metal for continuous fermentation tower packing. Annals, of the New York Academy of Sciences 1979; 326: 249
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J. F., Barker S. A., Humprhey J. D. Microbial cells living immobilized on metal hydroxides. Nature May, 1976; 261: 20–242
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J. F. Facile Methods for the Immobilization of microbial cells without disruption of their life processes. Immobilized Microbial Cells, K. Venkatsubramanian. ACS Symposium Series, No. 106. 1979; 119
   Google Scholar
• Dias S. M. M., Novais J. M., Cabral J. M. S. Immobilization of yeasts on titanium activated inorganic supports. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 203
   Google Scholar
• Jirku V., Turkova J., Krumphanzl V. Immobilization of yeast cells with retention of cell division and extracellular production of macromolecules. Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 509
   Google Scholar
• Rouxhet P. G., Van Haecht J. L., Didelez J., Gerard P., Briquet M. Immobilization of yeast cells by entrapment and adhesion using siliceous materials. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1981; 3: 49
   Google Scholar
• Mosbach K., Mosbach R. Entrapment of enzymes and microorganisms in synthetic cross-linked polymers and their applications in column techniques. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1966; 20: 2807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Updike S. J., Harris D. R., Shrago E. Microorganisms, alive and imprisoned in a polymer cage. Nature December, 1969; 224: 1122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosbach K., Larson P. O. Preparation and Application of polymer entrapped enzymes and microorganisms in microbial transformation processes, with special reference to steroid 11-β-Hydroxylation and Δ-Dehydrogenation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1970; 12: 19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takata I., Tosa T., Chibata I. Screening of matrix suitable for immobilization of microbial cells. J. Solid Phase Biochem. 1977; 2: 225
   Google Scholar
• Mosbach K. Use of immobilized cells with special emphasis on the formation of products formed by multistep enzyme systems and coenzymes. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1982; 32: 179
   Google Scholar
• Klein I., Wagner F. Immobilized whole cells. Dechema Monographic 1978; 82: 142
   Google Scholar
• Wagner F, Klein I. Some aspects of immobilization and reactivation of whole cells. Antonie Van Leeuwanhoek 1979; 45: 645
   Google Scholar
• Vorlop K. D., Klein I. Formation of spherical chitosan biocatalysts by ionotropic gelation. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 9
   Google Scholar
• Haug A., Larsen B., Smidsrod O. Uronic acid sequence in alginate from different sources. Carbohydrate Res. 1974; 32: 217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baardseth E. (1968) Localization and structure of alginate gels. Proceedings of the 5th International Seaweed Symposium. 1968, E. G. Young, J. L. MacLachlan. Pergamon Press, London, 19
   Google Scholar
• Hackel U., Klein J., Megnet R., Wagner F. Immobilization of microbial cells in polymeric matrices. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1975; 1: 291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheetham P. S. J. Physical studies on the mechanical stability of columns of calcium alginate gel pellets containing entrapped microbial cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1979; 1: 183
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham P. S. J., Blunt K. W., Bucke C. Physical studies on cell immobilization using calcium alginate gels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1979; 21: 2155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierstan M. The use of calcium alginate gels for “solids separation” and “diffusional chromatography” of biological materials. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 23: 707
   Google Scholar
• Kierstan M., Reilly J. Studies on the characteristics of alginate gels in relation to their use in separation and immobilization applications. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul F., Vignais P. M. Photophosphorylation in bacterial chromatophores entrapped in alginate gel: improvement of the physical and biochemical properties of gel beads with barium as the gel-inducing agent. Enzyme Microb. Teckoi 1980; 2: 281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White F. H., Portno A. D. Continuous fermentation by immobilized brewers yeast. J. Inst. Brewing 1978; 84: 228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linko Y. Y., Linko P. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast reactor. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linko Y. Y., Linko P. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast. Abstr. ofCommun., 2nd European Cong, of Biotechnol. 5–10 April, 1981, Eastbourne, England. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Kierstan M., Bucke C. The immobilization of microbial cells, subcellular organelles, and enzymes in calcium alginate gels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977; 19: 387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson P. O., Mosbach K. Alcohol production by magnetic immobilized yeast. Biotechnol. Lett. 1979; 1: 501
   Google Scholar
• Larson P. O., Birnbaum S., Mosbach K. Magnetic immobilized microrganisms. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 1: 717
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum S., Larson P. O. Application of magnetic immobilized microorganisms: ethanol production by. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1982; 7: 55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linko P. Immobilized live cells. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. I: 711
   Google Scholar
• Williams D., Munnecke D. M. The production of ethanol by immobilized yeast cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 23: 1813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho G. H., Choi C. Y., Choi Y. D., Han M. H. Ethanol production by immobilized yeast and its CO2gas effects in a packed bed reactor. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1982; 32: 959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Mattiasson B. Azide sterilization of fermentation medium: ethanol production from glucose using immobilized. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 14: 140
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Japanese unveil scaled-up nonstop immobilized yeast prototype plant for ethanol. McGraw-Hill Biotechnol. Newswatch. 1982; 2: 1
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Mattiason B. Shift in metabolism towards ethanol production inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeby addition of metabolic inhibitors. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 12 1982; 193
   Google Scholar
• Shiotani T., Yamane T. A horizontal packed bed bioreactor to reduce CO2holdup in the continuous production of ethanol by immobilized yeast cells. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1981; 13: 96
   Google Scholar
• Cho G. H., Choi C. V., Choi Y. D., Han M. H. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast in a fluidized reactor. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant F. J. A. The Characteristics ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeImmobilized in Calcium Alginate Gel Performing Ethanol Production. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, England. September. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Lee T. H., Ahn J. C., Ryu D. D. Y. Performance of an immobilized yeast reactor system for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol 1983; 5: 41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee J. E., St Julian G., Detroy R. W., Bothast R. J. Ethanol production by immobilizedSaccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarumand. Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee J. E., St Julian G., Detroy R. W. Continuous and static fermentation of glucose to ethanol by immobilizedSaccharomyces cerevisiaecells of different ages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982; 44: 19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. K., Wallace J. B. High ethanol productivities using small calcium alginate beads of immobilized cells of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett- 1981; 3: 613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G. E. Assessment of immobilized cell systems for ethanol production usingZymomonas mobilisandSaccharomyces cerevisiae. M.E.Sc. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Rowe G. E. Ethanol production usingZymomonas mobilisimmobilized in different carrageenan gels. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1983; 24: 329
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. K., Wallace J. B. The effect of CaCl2concentration on ethanol production and growth of immobilized cells ofZymomonas mobilissubmitted to. Eur. J. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol.
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Wallace J. B. The use of immobilized cells ofZymomonas mobilisin a novel fluidized bioreactor to produce ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng.Symp. No. 12 1982; 147
   Google Scholar
• Grote W., Lee K. J., Rogers P. L. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized cells of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1980; 2: 481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windholz M. Algin and alginic acid. The Merck Index. Merck and Co., New Jersey 1976; 34
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay A. M., Douglas L. J. Effects of phosphate limitation of growth on the cell-wall and lipid composition of. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Gen. Microbiol. 1979; 110: 185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones R. P., Pamment N., Greenfield P. F. Alcohol fermentation by yeasts – the effect of environmental and other variables. Process Biochem. April/May, 1981; 42
   Google Scholar
• Veliky I. A., Williams R. E. The production of ethanol bySaccharomyces cerevisiaeimmobilized in polycation-stabilized calcium alginate gels. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 275
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum S., Pendleton R., Larsson P. O., Mosbach K. Covalent stabilization of alginate gel for the entrapment of living whole cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum S., Larsson P. O., Mosbach K. Stabilization of Calcium Alginate Gel. Abstr. of Commun. 2nd European Cong, for Biotechnol.5–10 April, 1981, Eastbourne. England. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Haug A., Smidsred O. The effect of divalent metals on the properties of alginate solutions. II. comparison of different metal ions. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1965; 19: 341
   Google Scholar
• Chibata I., Tosa T. Immobilized microbial cells and their applications. T.I.B.S. April, 1980; 88
   Google Scholar
• Tosa T., Sato T., Mori T., Yamamoto K., Takata I., Nishida Y., Chibata I. Immobilization of enzymes and microbial cells using carrageenan as matrix. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1979; 21: 1697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuu W. Y., Polack J. A. Strengthening Immobilized Biocatalysts by Diffusion and Gel Phase Polymerization. Presented at the 75th Annual AIChE Meeting, 14–18 November 1982, Los Angeles, California. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Wada M., Kato J., Chibata I. A new immobilization of microbial cells: immobilized growing cells using carrageenan gel and their properties. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1979; 8: 241
   Google Scholar
• Wada M., Kato J., Chibata I. Electron microscopic observation of immobilized growing yeast cells. J. Ferment. TechnoL 1980; 58: 327
   Google Scholar
• Larreta V., Thomasset B., Barbotin J. N. Electron microscopic evidence of an immobilized living cell system. Enzyme Microb. Technol 1981; 3: 216
   Google Scholar
• Wada M., Kato J., Chibata I. Continuous production of ethanol using immobilized growing yeast cells. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1980; 10: 275
   Google Scholar
• Wada M., Kato J., Chibata I. Continuous production of ethanol in high concentration using immobilized growing yeast cells. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1981; 11: 67
   Google Scholar
• Amin G., Verachtert H. Comparative study of ethanol production by immobilized cell systems usingZymomonas mobilisand. Saccharomyces bayanus, Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 14: 59
   Google Scholar
• Wang H. Y., Hettwer D.J. Cell immobilization in K-carrageenan with tricalcium phosphate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H. Y., Lee S. S., Takachi Y., Cawthon L. Maximizing microbial cell loading in im-mobilized-cell systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 12 1982; 139
   Google Scholar
• Lee S. S., Wang H. Y. Repeated fed-batch rapid fermentation using yeast cells and activated carbon extraction system. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 12 1982; 221
   Google Scholar
• Koshcheenko K. A., Bychkova G. G., Gulevskaya S. A., Lusta K. A., Gulaya V. E., Ananchenko S. N. Physiological and biochemical properties and morphology ofSaccharomyces cerevisiueBKMU-488 cells incorporated into polyacrylamide gel. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. Ser. Biol. 1978; 6: 862
   Google Scholar
• Koshcheenko K. A., Avramova T. G., Sukhodol'sk G. V. Influence of conditions of immobilization on enzymatic activity of immobilized cells. 12v. Akad. Nauk. SSSR., Ser. Biol. 1981; 2: 174
   Google Scholar
• Siess M. H., Divies C. Behavior ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCells entrapped in a polyacrylamide gel and performing alcoholic fermentation. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnoi 1981; 12: 10
   Google Scholar
• Divies C. Use of polymer matrix-embedded micro-organisms in enzyme reactions. German Patent 1977; 2: 633–076
   Google Scholar
• Sato T., Mori T., Tosa T., Chibata I., Kurui M., Yamashita K., Sumi A. Engineering analysis of continuous production of L-Aspartic acid by immobilizedEscherichia colicells in fixed beds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1975; 17: 1797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pines G., Freeman A. Immobilization and characterization ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaein crosslinked, prepolymerized polyacrylamide-hydrazide. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 16: 75
   Google Scholar
• Freeman A., Aharanowitz Y. Immobilization of microbial cells in crosslinked, prepolymerized, linear polyacrylamide gels: antibiotic production by immobilizedStrepwmyces clavuligeruscells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 23: 2747
   Google Scholar
• Klein J., Eng H. Immobilization of microbial cells in epoxy carrier systems. Biotechnol. Lett. 1979; 1: 171
   Google Scholar
• Klein J., Kressdorf B. Immobilization of living whole cells in an epoxy matrix. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 375
   Google Scholar
• Gianfreda L., Parascandola P., Scardi V. A new method of whole microbial cell immobilization. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1980; 11: 6
   Google Scholar
• Siva Raman H., Seetarama Rao B., Pundle A. V., Siva Raman C. Continuous ethanol production by yeast cells immobilized in open pore gelatin matrix. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 359
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G., Harder A., Kossen N. W. F. Tensile stress-strain measurements of materials used for immobilization. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 103
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G. Production of ethanol by immobilized yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwanhoek. J. Microbiol. Serol. 1979; 45: 687
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G., Kossen N. W. F. Gas production by immobilized micro-organisms: theoretical approach. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980; 22: 681
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G., Kossen N. W. F. Gas production by immobilized micro-organisms: calculation of theoretical maximum productivity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 23: 651
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel P. G., Kossen N. W. F. Theoretical and practical aspects of gas producing immobilized systems. Abstr. of Commun. :2nd European Congr. of Biotechnol. 5–10 April, 1981, Eastbourne, England. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Chen S. L., Gutmanis F. Carbon dioxide inhibition of yeast growth in biomass production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1976; 18: 1455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunkee R. E., Ough C. S. Multiplication and fermentation ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeunder carbon dioxide pressure in wine. Appl. Microbiol. 1966; 14: 643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones R. P., Greenfield P. F. Effect of carbon dioxide on yeast growth and fermentation. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 1982; 4: 210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson B., Daoud I. S. Microbil floes and flocculation in fermentation process engineering. Adv. in Biochem. Eng. 1976; 4: 41
   Google Scholar
• Smith E. L., Greenshields R. N. Tower fermentation systems: their application in continuous brewing. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 4 1973; 519
   Google Scholar
• Greenshields R. N., Smith E. L. The tubular reactor in fermentation. Process Biochem. April, 1974; 11
   Google Scholar
• Wick E., Popper K. Continuous fermentation in slant tubes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977; 19: 235
   Google Scholar
• Prince I. G., Barford J. P. Continuous tower fermentation for power ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince I. G., Barford J. P. Tower fermentation usingZymomonas mobilisfor ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince I. G., Barford J. P. Induced flocculation of yeasts for use in the tower fermenter. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 621
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao H. Y., Chiang L. C., Yang C. M., Chen L. F., Tsao G. T. Preparation and performance of immobilized yeast cells in columns containing no inert carrier. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983; 25: 363
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moebus O., Teuber M. Production of ethanol by solid particles ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaein a fluidized bed. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 15: 194
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg G. W., Donaldson T. L., Arcuri E. J. Continuous ethanol production by a flocculant strain of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein J. E., Lawford H. G., Lawford G. R., Zawadski B. C., Charley R. C. High productivity continuous ethanol fermentation with a flocculant mutant strain of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1983; 5: 19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. H., Skotnicki M. L., Rogers P. L. Kinetic studies on a flocculam strain of. Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boks P. A., van Eybergen G. C. Continuous ethanol production using cell recycle with a settler. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston M. G. Tower fermentation of beer. Process Biochem. 1966; 1(4)
   Google Scholar
• Ault R. G., Hampton A. N., Newton R., Roberts R. H. Biological and biochemical aspects of tower fermentation. J. Inst. Brewing. 1969; 75: 260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenshields R. N., Smith E. L. Tower fermentation systems and their applications. Chem. Eng. 1971; 249: 182
   Google Scholar
• Jin C. K., Wang S. S. Continuous production of ethanol in a two-stage fermentation process using a protein-phospholipid complex as a protective agent. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 1982; 4: 256
   Google Scholar
• Weeks M. G., Munro P. A., Spedding P. L. Semi-continuous ethanolic fermentation using a novel yeast settling and recycle technique. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 85
   Google Scholar
• Weeks M. G., Munro P. A., Spedding P. L. New concepts for rapid yeast settling. I. Flocculation with an inert powder. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983; 25: 687
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weeks M. G., Munro P. A., Spedding P. L. New concepts for rapid yeast settling. II. pH switching with an inert powder. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983; 25: 699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linko Y., Jalanka H., Linko P. Ethanol production from whey with immobilized living yeast. Bioechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohan L. A., Baret J. L., Pain S., Delalande P. Lactose hydrolysis by immobilized lactase: semi-industrial experience. Food Process Engineering, P. Linko, J. Larinkari. Applied Science Publishers, London 1980; Vol. 2: 137
   Google Scholar
• Compere A. L., Griffith W. L. Fermentation of waste materials to produce industrial intermediates. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1976; 17: 247
   Google Scholar
• Gawel J., Kosikowski F. V. Improving alcohol fermentation in concentrated ultrafiltration permeates of cottage cheese whey. J. Food Sci. 1978; 43: 1717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary V. S., Sutton C., Bencivengo M., Sullivan B., Holsinger V. H. Influence of lactose hydrolysis and solids concentration in alcohol production by yeast in acid whey ultrafiltrate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977; 19: 1689
   Google Scholar
• Izaguirre M. E., Castello F. J. Selection of lactose-fermenting yeast for ethanol production from whey. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 257
   Google Scholar
• Moulin G., Galzy P. Alcohol production from whey. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto. 1981; Vol. 2: 181
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B. Enzymes co-immobilized with microorganisms for the microbial conversion of non-metabolizable substrates. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1980; 34: 611
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B. Enzymes coimmobilized with microorganisms: the bioconversion of whey permeate to ethanol with (3-galactosidase and. Succhuromyces cerevisiae, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1982; 7: 43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes R. D. Energy crops – what little we know. Proc. 3rd Bioenergy R and D Semin., 24–25 March, 1981, Ottawa. Canada. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Bacon J. S. D., Edelman J. The carbohydrates of the Jerusalem Artichoke and other compositae. Biochem. J. 1951; 48: 114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kierstan M. Production of fructose syrups from inulin. Process Biochem. May, 1980; 2
   Google Scholar
• Chubey B. B., Dorrell D. G. Jerusalem Artichoke, a potential fructose crop for the prairies. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 1974; 7: 98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrell D. G., Chubey B. B. Irrigation, fertilizer, harvest dates and storage effects on the reducing sugar and fructose concentration of Jerusalem Artichoke tubers. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 1977; 57: 591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming S. A., Grootwassink J. W. D. Preparation of high-fructose syrup from the tubers of the Jerusalem artichoke. (Helianthus tuberosus L.). CRC Critical Reviews Food Sci. Nutr. 1979; 12: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brachvogel J. K. Industrial Alcohol. Munn and Co., New York 1907
   Google Scholar
• Underkofler L. A., McPherson W. K., Fulmer E. I. Alcoholic fermentation of Jerusalem Artichokes. Ind. Chem. Eng. 1937; 29: 1160
   Google Scholar
• Boinot F. The Jerusalem Artichoke in alcohol manufacture. Bull. Assoc. Chim. 1942; 9: 792
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P., Cannell E. Optimization studies for the bioconversion of Jerusalem Artichoke tubers to ethanol and microbial biomass. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P., Bajpai P. K. Fuel ethanol production from Jerusalem Artichoke stalks using different yeast. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1983; 24: 321
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Ethanol production from Jerusalem Artichoke tubers(Heliamhus tuberosus)usingKluyveromyces marxianusand. Saccharomyces rosei, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 24: 941
   Google Scholar
• Duvnjak Z., Kosaric N., Hayes R. D. Kinetics of ethanol production from Jerusalem Artichoke juice with some. Kluyveromyces species, Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvnjak Z., Kosaric N., Kliza S., Hayes R. D. Production of Ethanol from Jerusalem Artichokes by Yeasts. paper presented at the 28th IUPAC Congr., 16–22 August 1981 Vancouver, Canada. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud J. P., Galzy P. Alcohol Production by Fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke Extract. paper presented at the 28th IUPAC Congr., 16–22 August, 1981, Vancouver. Canada. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud J. P., Daurelles J., Galzy P. Alcohol production from Jerusalem Artichoke using yeasts with inulinase activity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981; 23: 1461
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud J. P., Deville-Duc T., Galzy P. Selection of yeast strains for ethanol production from inulin. Folia Microbiol. 1981; 26: 147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guiraud J. P., Caillaud J. M., Galzy P. Optimization of alcohol production from Jerusalem Artichokes. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982; 14: 81
   Google Scholar
• Williams L. A., Ziobro G. Processing and fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982; 4: 45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Repeated batch production of ethanol from Jerusalem Artichoke tubers using recycled immobilized cells of. Kluyveromyces fragilis, Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P., Lachance A. The Use of Free and Immobilized Cells ofDebaromyces polymorphusto Produce Ethanol From Jerusalem Artichoke Tubers. J. Ferment. Technol. 1983; 61: 533
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Continuous ethanol production from Jerusalem Artichoke Tubers. I. Use of free cells of. Kluyveromyces marxianus, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Continuous ethanol production from Jerusalem Artichoke tubers. II. Use of immobilized cells of. Kluyveromyces marxianus, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Continuous Ethanol Production From Concentrated Jerusalem Artichoke Extract Using Immobilized Cells ofKluyveromyces marxianus. Paper presented at the 23rd Int. Congr. of Microbiol., 8–13 August, 1982, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Ghose T. K. Cellulase biosynthesis and hydrolysis of cellulosic substances. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1977; 6: 39
   Google Scholar
• Linko M. An evaluation of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1977; 5: 25
   Google Scholar
• Bisaria V. S., Ghose T. K. Biodegradation of cellulosic materials: substrates, microorganisms, enzymes and products. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1981; 3: 90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangnu S. K. Process development for ethanol production based on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Process Biochem. May/June, 1982; 36
   Google Scholar
• Wood T. M., McCrae S. I. The Cellulase Complex of Trichoderma koningii. Symp. on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose, 12–14March, M. M. Bailey, T. M. Enari, M. Linko. Helsinki, Finland 1975; 231
   Google Scholar
• Ferchak J. D., Hahn-Hagerdal B., Pye K. Saccharification of cellulose by the cellulolytic enzyme system ofThermonospora sp.II. Hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980; 22
   Google Scholar
• Halliwell G., Griffin M. The nature and mode of action of the cellulolytic component C. ofTrichoderma koningiion native cellulose. Biochem. J. 1973; 135: 587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi M., Abe S., Suzuki S., Emert G. H., Yata N. A method for production of alcohol directly from cellulose using cellulase and yeast. Bioconversion of Cellulosic Substances in Energy, Chemicals and Microbial Protein, T. K. Ghose. IIT, Delhi 1977; 551
   Google Scholar
• Savarese J. J., Young S. D. Combined enzyme hydrolysis of cellulose and yeast fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1978; 20: 1291
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Mosbach K. The production of ethanol from cellobiose using baker's yeast co-immobilized with B-glucosidase. Food Process Engineering, P. Linko, J. Larinkari. Applied Science Publishers, London 1979; Vol. 2: 129
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Andersson E., Lopez-Leiva M., Mattiasson B. Membrane biotechnology, co-immobilization and aqueous two phase systems: alternatives in bioconversion of cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Symp. No. 11 1981; 651
   Google Scholar
• Hartmeir W. Basic trials on the conversion of cellulosic material to ethanol using yeast co-immobilized with cellulolytic enzymes. Advances in Biotechnology, M. Moo-Young. Pergamon Press, Toronto 1981; Vol. 3: 377
   Google Scholar
• Kierstan M., McHale A., Coughlan M. P. The production of ethanol from cellobiose using immobilized β-glucosidase coentrapped with yeast in alginate gels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Lopez-Leiva M., Mattiasson B. Membrane technology applied to bioconversion of macromolecular substrates and upgrading of products: a model study on ethanol production from cellulose. Desalination 1980; 35: 365
   Google Scholar
• Lilly M. D. Two-liquid-phase biocatalytic reactions. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1982; 32: 162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Mattiasson B., Albertsson P. A. The Use of Aqueous Two Phase Systems for Enzymatic Saccharification and Fermentation of Cellulose. Abstr. of Commun.: 2nd European Congr. of Biotechnol., 5–10 April 1981, Eastbourne, England. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Matiasson B., Albertsson P. A. Extractive byconversion in aqueous two-phase systems. A model study on the conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Mattiasson B., AndersSon E., Albertsson P. A. Soluble temporarily immobilized biocatalysts. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1982; 32: 157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg S. L. Fermentation of pentose sugars to ethanol and other neutral products by micro-organisms. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1980; 2: 185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H., Wang P. Y., Chan Y. K., Maleszka R. Conversion of D-xylose into ethanol by the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong C. S., McCracken L. D., Tsao G. T. Direct fermentation of D-xylose to ethanol by a xylose fermenting yeast mutant. Candida sp. XF217. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis A., Bajpai P. Direct fermentation of D-Xylose to ethanol by. Kluyveromyces marxianus strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982; 44: 1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleszka R., Veliky I. A., Schneider H. Enhanced rate of ethanol production from D-xylose using recycled or immobilized cells of. Pachysolen tannophilus, Biotechnol. Lett. 1981; 3: 415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slininger P. J., Bothast R. J., Black L. T., McGhee J. E. Continuous conversion of D-xylose to ethanol by immobilized. Pachysolen tannophilus, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982; 24: 2241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang L. C., Hsiao H. Y., Flickinger M. C., Tsao G. T. Ethanol production from pentoses by immobilized microorganisms. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1982; 4: 93
   Google Scholar
• Hattori R., Hattori T., Furusaka C. Growth of bacteria on the surface of anion-exchange resin. I. Experiment with batch culture. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1972; 18: 271
   Google Scholar
• Hattori R., Hattori T., Furusaka C. Growth of bacteria on the surface of anion-exchange resin. II. Electron microscopic observation of adsorbed cells growing on resin surface by carbon replica method. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol 1972; 18: 285
   Google Scholar
• Hattori R. Growth ofEcherichia colionthe surface of an anion-exchange resin in continuous flow system. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1972; 18: 319
   Google Scholar
• Haider K., Filip Z., Martin J. P. Influence of montmorillonite on the formation of biomass and metabolic products by some microorganisms. Arch. Microbiol. 1970; 73: 201
   Google Scholar
• Holcberg I. B., Margalith P. Alcoholic fermentation by immobilized yeast at high sugar concentrations. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1981; 13: 133
   Google Scholar
• Mattiasson B., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Microenvironmental effects on metabolic behavior of immobilized cells: A hypothesis. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1982; 16: 52
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hagerdal B., Larsson M., Mattiasson B. Shift in metabolism towards ethanol production inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeusing alterations of the physical-chemical microenvironment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. No. 12 1982; 199
   Google Scholar
• Kazantsev E. N., Kolpakchi A. P., Ratter N. N. Effect of long continuous cultivation on the morphology and physiology of yeasts on a carrier. Microbiology 1979; 48: 236
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J. M., Durand G. Modifications de la croissance deSaccharomyces uvarumpar immobilisation sur support solide. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris Ser. D. 1980; 290: 453
   Google Scholar