Cellulose Degradation by Ruminal Microorganisms

References

• The Global Carbon Cycle SCOPE B, B. Bolin. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. The United States-Canadian Table of Feed Composition, 3rd rev. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1982
   Google Scholar
• Cherney J. H., Anliker K. S., Albrecht K. A., Wood K. V. Soluble phenolic monomers in forage crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1989; 37: 345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest P. J., Mertens D. R. Composition and nutritive characteristics of low-quality cellulosic waste. Fed. Proc 1974; 33: 1942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agricultural Statistics 1990. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Church D. C. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, 2nd ed. Oregon State University Bookstores, Corvallis 1975; Vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Dehority B. A. Cellulose digestion in ruminants. Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Cellulose, C. H. Haigler, P. J. Weimer. Marcel Dekker, New York 1991; 327
   Google Scholar
• Hungate R. E. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Russell J. B., Hino T. Regulation of lactate production in Streptococcus bovis: a spiraling effect that contributes to rumen acidosis. J. Dairy Sci. 1985; 68: 1712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. B., Stroebel H. J. Effect of ion-ophores on ruminal fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson V. W., Sutton J. D. Continuous recording of the pH in the bovine rumen. Br. J. Nutr. 1968; 22: 303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke R. T. J. The gut and its microbes. Microbial Ecology of the Gut, R. T. J. Clarke, T. Bauchop. Academic Press, New York 1977; 77
   Google Scholar
• Ellis J. E., Williams A. G., Lloyd D. Oxygen consumption by ruminal microorganisms: protozoal and bacterial contributions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 2583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson P. N. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest P. J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O & B Books, Corvallis 1982
   Google Scholar
• Akin D. E., Ljungdahl L. G., Wilson J. R., Harris P. J. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants. Elsevier, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Baci C. A., Harris P. J., Stone B. A. Structure and function of plant cell walls. Biochemistry of Plants, J. Preiss. Academic Press, New York 1988; Vol. 14: 297
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert I. G., Tsao G. T. Interaction between solid substrate and cellulase enzymes in cellulose hydrolysis. Annu. Rep. Ferm. Proc. 1983; 6: 323
   Google Scholar
• Marchessault R. H., Sundararajan P. R. Cellulose. The Polysaccharides, G. O. Aspinall. Academic Press, New York 1983; Vol. 2: 11
   Google Scholar
• Atalia R. H., Van der Hart D. L. Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984; 223: 283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris P. J. Plant cell wall structure and development. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 71
   Google Scholar
• Marchessault R. H., Howsmon J. A. Experimental evaluation of the lateral order distribution in cellulose. Text. Res. J. 1959; 27: 30
   Google Scholar
• Hearle J. W. S. A fringed fibrillar theory of structure in crystalline polymers. J. Polym. Sci. 1958; 28: 432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink H.-P., Phillipp B. Models of cellulose physical structure from the viewpoint of the cellulose I, II transition. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1985; 30: 3779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A. H., Hay A. J., Dinsdale D., Bacon J. S. D. Polysaccharides and associated components of mesophyll cell walls prepared from grasses. Carbohydr. Res. 1977; 57: 235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elofson R. M., Ripmeester J. A., Cyr N., Milligan N. P., Mathison G. Nutritional evaluation of forages by high-resolution solid-state 13C-NMR. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1984; 64: 93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman R. H., Hemmingson J. A. Determination of the degree of cellulose crystallinity in wood by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Holzforschung 1990; 44: 351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L. T., Lee Y.-H., Beardmore D. R. Major chemical and physical features of cellulosic materials as substrates for enzymatic hydrolysis. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1980; 14: 101
   Google Scholar
• Young R. A. Structure, swelling, and bonding of cellulose fibers. Cellulose, Structure, Modification, and Hydrolysis, R. A. Young, R. M. Rowell. Interscience, New York 1986; 91
   Google Scholar
• Hartley R. D. p-Coumaric and ferulic acid components of cell walls of ryegrass and their relationships with lignin and digestibility. J. Sci. Food Agric 1972; 23: 1347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley R. D., Ford C. W. Phenolic constituents of plant cell walls and wall biodegradability. Plant Cell Wall Polymers: Biogenesis and Bio-degradation, N. G. Lewis, M. G. Paice. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1989; 137
   Google Scholar
• Chesson A. Lignin-polysaccharide complexes of the plant cell wall and their effect on microbial degradation in the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1988; 21: 219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon J. S. D. Plant cell wall digestibility and chemical structure. Rep. Rowett Inst. 1979; 35: 99
   Google Scholar
• Morrison I. M. Carbohydrate chemistry and rumen digestion. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1979; 38: 269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam T. B. T., Iiyama K., Nakano J. Preparation of carboxymethylcellulose from refiner mechanical pulp. V. Physical and chemical associations among cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Mokuzai Gakkashi 1985; 31: 475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvendran R. R. The chemistry of plant cell walls. Dietary Fibre, G. G. Birch, K. J. Parken. Applied Science Publishers, New York 1983; 95
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery L., Flesher B. A., Stahl D. Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and description of Fibrobacter intestinalis, sp. nov., to. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1988; 38: 430
   Google Scholar
• Bryant M. P., Small N. The anaerobic mon-otrichous butyric acid-producing curved rod-shaped bacteria of the rumen. J. Bacteriol. 1956; 72: 16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant M. P. Normal flora — rumen bacteria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1970; 23: 1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant M. P. Nutritional requirements of the predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Fed. Proc 1973; 32: 1809
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart C. S., Flint H. J. Bacteroides (Fibrobacter) succinogenes, a cellulolytic anaerobic bacterium from the gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1989; 30: 433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne J. M., Dehority B. A. Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 2247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott H. W., Dehority B. A. Vitamin requirements of several cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1965; 89: 1169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison M. J., Bryant M. P., Katz I., Keeney M. Metabolic function of branch-chain volatile fatty acids, growth factors for ruminococci. II. Biosynthesis of higher branch-chain fatty acids and aldehydes. J. Bacteriol. 1962; 83: 1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marounek M., Wallace R. J. Influence of culture Eh on the growth and metabolism of the rumen bacteria Selenomonas ruminantium, Bacteroides amylophilus, Bacteroides succinogenes, and Streptococcus bovis in batch culture. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1984; 130: 223
   Google Scholar
• Veira D. M. The role of ciliate protozoa in nutrition of the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 1986; 63: 1547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpin C. G., Letcher A. J. Effect of absence of ciliate protozoa on rumen fluid volume, flow rate, and bacterial populations in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983; 10: 145, 84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng K. J., Akin D. E., Costerton J. W. Rumen bacteria: interaction with particulate dietary components and response to dietary variation. Fed. Proc 1977; 36: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dehority B. A., Scott H. W. Extent of cellulose and hemicellulose digestion in various forages by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 1967; 50: 1136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliwell G., Bryant M. P. The cellulolytic activity of pure strains of bacteria from the rumen of cattle. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1963; 32: 441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Gylswyk N. O., Labuschagne J. P. L. Relative efficiency of pure cultures of different species of cellulolytic rumen bacteria in solubilizing cellulose in vitro. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1971; 66: 109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kock S. G., Kistner A. Extent of solubilization of cellulose and hemicellulose of low-protein teff hay by pure cultures of cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1969; 55: 459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varel V. H., Dehority B. A. Ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and protozoa from bison, cattle-bison hybrids, and cattle fed three alfalfa-corn diets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner A. E., Jr., Baldwin R. L. Enzymatic studies of pure cultures of rumen microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 1966; 92: 1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopgood M. F., Walker D. J. Succinic acid production by rumen bacteria. III. Enzymatic studies on the formation of succinate by Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 1969; 22: 1413
   Google Scholar
• Miller T. L. The pathway of formation of acetate and succinate from pyruvate by Bacteroides succinogenes. Arch. Microbiol. 1978; 117: 145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Formation of hydrogen and formate by Ruminococcus albus. J. Bacteriol. 1973; 116: 836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hespell R. B. Efficiency of growth by ruminal bacteria. Fed. Proc 1979; 38: 2707
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hespell R. B., Bryant M. P. Efficiency of rumen microbial growth: influence of some theoretical and experimental factors on YATP. J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 49: 1640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpin C. G. The rumen flagellate Callimastixfrontalis: does sequestration occur?. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1974; 84: 395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orpin C. G. Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1975; 91: 249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orpin C. G. The invasion of plant tissue in the rumen by the flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977; 98: 423
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orpin C. G. The rumen flagellate Piromonas communis: its life history and invasion of plant material in the rumen. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977; 99: 107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orpin C. G., Letcher A. Utilization of cellulose, starch, xylan and hemicelluloses for growth by the rumen phycomycete. Neocallimastix frontalis, Curr. Microbiol. 1979; 3: 121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath I. B., Bauchop T., Skipp R. A. Assignment of the rumen anaerobe Neocallimastix frontalis to the Spizellomycetales (Chytridiomycetes) on the basis of its polyflagellate zoospore ultrastructure. Can. J. Bot. 1983; 61: 295
   Google Scholar
• Orpin C. G. Studies of the rumen flagellate Sphaeromonas communis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1976; 94: 270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orpin C. G., Munn N. A. Neocallimastix patriciarum, sp. no v., a new member of the Neo-callimasticaceae inhabiting the rumen of sheep. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc 1986; 86: 178
   Google Scholar
• Breton A., Bernalier A., Bonnemoy F., Fonty G., Gaillard B., Gouet B. Morphological and metabolic characterization of a new species of strictly anaerobic rumen fungus. Neocallimastix joyonii, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1989; 58: 309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr D. J. S., Kudo H., Jakoben K. D., Cheng K.-J. Morphological development of rumen fungi: Neocallimastix sp., Piromyces communis, and Orpinomyces bovis, gen. nov. Can. J. Bot. 1989; 67: 2815
   Google Scholar
• Breton A., Bernalier A., Dusser M., Fonty G., Gaillard-Martinie B., Guillot J. Anaero-myces mucronatus nov. gen., nov. sp., a new strictly anaerobic rumen fungus with polycentric thallus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990; 70: 177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y. W., Bauchop T., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. Ruminomyces elegans gen. et sp. nov., a polycentric anaerobic rumen fungus from cattle. Mycotaxon 1990; 38: 397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner A. C. I. Diurnal changes in the concentrations of micro-organisms in the rumen of sheep fed limited diets once daily. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1966; 45: 213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mountfort D. O., Asher R. A. Production and regulation of cellulase by two strains of the rumen anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985; 49: 1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. G., Orpin C. G. Polysaccharide-degrading enzymes present in the zoospore and vegetative growth stages of the rumen fungi Neocallimastix patriciarum, Piromonas communis, and an unidentified isolate, grown on a range of carbohydrate substrates. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987; 33: 427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison M., Mackie R. I., Kistner A. Evidence that cellulolysis by an anaerobic ruminal fungus is catabolite regulated by glucose, cellobiose, and soluble starch. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 3227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calza R. E. Regulation of protein and cellulase excretion in the ruminal fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. Curr. Microbiol. 1990; 21: 109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borneman W. S., Akin D. E., Ljungdahl L. G. Fermentation products and plant cell wall degrading enzymes produced by monocentric and polycentric anaerobic ruminal fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpin C. G. The role of ciliate protozoa and fungi in the rumen digestion of plant cell walls. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983; 10: 121, 84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin D. E., Lyon C. E., Windham W. R., Rigsby L. L. Physical degradation of lignified stem tissues by ruminal fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joblin K. N. Isolation, enumeration, and maintenance of rumen anaerobic fungi in roll tubes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981; 42: 1119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart C. S., Duncan S. H., Joblin K. N. The use of tritiated cellulose for the rapid enumeration of cellulolytic anaerobes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1985; 1: 45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker S. K. Allometry and the implications of cell size in the ruminal microbial population. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 253
   Google Scholar
• Wood T. M., Wilson C. A., McCrea S. I., Joblin K. N. A highly active extracellular cellulase from the rumen anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1986; 43: 37
   Google Scholar
• Ho Y. W., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. Penetrating structures of anaerobic fungi in cattle and swamp buffalo. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1988; 134: 177
   Google Scholar
• Borneman W. S., Akin D. E. Lignocellulose degradation by rumen fungi and bacteria: ultrastructure and cell wall degrading enzymes. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 325
   Google Scholar
• Coleman G. S. The cellulase content of 15 species of entodinomorphid protozoa, mixed bacteria, and plant debris isolated from the ovine rumen. J. Agric. Sci. 1985; 104: 349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey R. W., Clarke R. T. J. Carbohydrase activity of rumen Entinodinium sp. from sheep on a starch-free diet. Nature 1963; 198: 787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijzen H. J., Lubberding H. J., Gerhardus M. J. T., Vogels G. D. Contribution of rumen protozoa to fibre digestion and cellulase activity in vitro. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Rev. Lett. 1988; 53: 35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfosse-Debucher J., Thines-Sempous D., Van Bell M., Latteur B. Contribution of protozoa to the rumen cellulolytic activity. Ann. Rech. Vet. 1979; 10: 255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonhomme A., Fonty G., Foglietti M. J., Robi C. D., Weber M. Endo-1,4-β-glucanase and β-glucosidase of the ciliate Polyplastron multivesicu-latum free of cellulolytic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 1986; 32: 219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gylswyk N. O., van der Toon J. J. T.K. Enumeration of Bacteroides succinogenes in the rumen of sheep fed maize-straw diets. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1986; 38: 205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L., McGavin M., Forsberg C. W., Lam J. S., Cheng K. J. Antigenic nature of chloride-stimulated cellobiosidase and other cellulases of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. B., Strobel H. J., Chen G. The enrichment and isolation of a ruminal bacterium with a very high specific activity of ammonia production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988; 54: 872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G., Russell J. B. More monensin-sen-sitive, ammonia producing bacteria from the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng K.-J., Fay J. P., Howarth R. E., Costerton J. W. Sequence of events in the digestion of fresh legume leaves by rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1980; 40: 613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin D. E. Microscopic evaluation of forage digestion by rumen microorganisms — a review. J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 48: 701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin D. E. Evaluation by electron microscopy and anaerobic culture of types of rumen bacteria associated with digestion of forage cell walls. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980; 38: 242
   Google Scholar
• Akin D. E., Barton F. E. II, Rumen microbial attachment and degradation of plant cell walls. Fed. Proc 1983; 42: 114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kudo H., Cheng K.-J., Costerton J. W. Electron microscopic study of the mefhylcellulose-mediated detachment of cellulolytic rumen bacteria from cellulose fibers. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987; 33: 267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minato H., Suto T. Technique for fractionation of bacteria in rumen microbial ecosystem. II. Attachment of bacteria isolated from bovine rumen to cellulose powder and elution of bacteria attached therefrom. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1978; 24: 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen M. A., White B. A., Hespell R. B. Improved assay for quantitating adherence of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria to cellulose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J., Forsberg C. W. Factors affecting adhesion of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 and adherence-defective mutants to cellulose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989; 55: 3039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger V., Fonty G., Komisarczuk-Bony S., Gouet P. Effects of physicochemical factors on the adhesion to cellulose Avicel of the ruminal bacteria Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp succinogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 3081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris E. J., Cole O. J. Relationship between cellulolytic activity and adhesion to cellulose in R. albus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987; 133: 1023
   Google Scholar
• Costerton J. W., Daamgard H. N., Cheng K. J. Cell envelope morphology of rumen bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1974; 118: 1132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham M. J., Brooker B. E., Pettipher G. L., Harris P. J. Ruminococcus flavefaciens cell coat and adhesion to cotton cellulose and to cell walls in leaves of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1978; 35: 156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson H., Irvin R., Costerton J. W., Cheng K.-J. infrastructure and adhesion properties of Ruminococcus albus. J. Bacterioi. 1975; 122: 278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escher A., Charackilis W. G. Modeling the initial events in biofilm accumulation. Biqfilms, W. G. Charackilis. Interscience, New York 1990; 445
   Google Scholar
• Cheng K. J., Stewart C. S., Dinsdale D., Costerton J. W. Electron microscopy of bacteria involved in the digestion of plant cell walls. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 1983/84; 10: 93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin D. E. Ultrastructure of rumen bacterial attachment to forage cell walls. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1976; 31: 562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham M. J., Brooker B. E., Pettipher G. L., Harris P. J. Adhesion of Bacteroides succinogenes in pure culture and in the presence of Ruminococcus flavefaciens to cell walls in leaves of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1978; 35: 1166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchop T. Rumen anaerobic fungi of cattle and sheep. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979; 38: 148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpin C. G., Bountiff L. Zoospore chemo-taxis in the rumen phycomycete Neocallimastix frontalis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1978; 104: 113
   Google Scholar
• Amos H. E., Akin D. E. Rumen protozoal degradation of structurally intact forage tissues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1978; 36: 513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walseth C. S. The influence of the fine structure of cellulose on the action of cellulases. TAPPI 1952; 35: 233
   Google Scholar
• Stone J. E., Scallan A. M., Donefer E., Ahlgren E. Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of similar size to a cellulase enzyme. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1969; 95: 219
   Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., Weston W. M. Relationship between the fine structure of native cellulose and cellulose degradability by the cellulase complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 1540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertran M. S., Dale B. E. Enzymatic hydrolysis and recrystallization behavior of initially amorphous cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oermoun Z., Belaich J. P. Microcalorimetric study of cellulose degradation by Cellulomonas uda ATCC 21399. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B. H., Wimpenny J. W. T. Growth and cellulolytic activity of Cellulomonas flavigena. Can. J. Microbiol. 1981; 27: 1260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Coninck-Chosson J. Aerobic degradation of cellulose and adsorption properties of cellulases in Cellulomonas uda JC3: effects of crystallinity of substrate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1988; 31: 495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., Lopez-Guisa J. M., French A. D. Effect of cellulose fine structure on the kinetics of its digestion by mixed rumen microflora in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 2421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith W. R., Yu I., Hungate R. E. Factors affecting cellulolysis by Ruminococcus albus. J. Bac-terioi 1973; 114: 729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K. W., Ladisch M. R., Voloch M., Patterson J. A., Noller C. H. Effect of pre-treatments and fermentation on pore size in cellulosic materials. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 1427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehority B. A. Effect of particle size on the digestion rate of purified cellulose by rumen cellulolytic bacteria in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 1961; 44: 687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehority B. A., Johnson R. R. Effect of particle size upon the in vitro cellulose digestibility of forages by rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 1961; 44: 2242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge R. J., Richards G. N. Investigation of the digestion of cell-wall polysaccharides of spear grass and of cotton cellulose by viscometry and X-ray diffraction. Carbohydr. Res. 1975; 43: 163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., French A. D., Calamari T. A. Jr., Differential fermentation of cellulose allomorphs by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991; 57: 3101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliwell G. Cellulolytic properties from microorganisms of the rumen and from Myrothecium ver-rucaria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1957; 17: 166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Soest P. J. The uniformity and nutritive availability of cellulose. Fed. Proc 1973; 32: 1804
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodman H. E., Stewart J. The mechanism of cellulose digestion in the ruminant organism. The action of cellulose-splitting bacteria on the fiber of certain typical feeding stuffs. J. Agric. Sci. 1932; 22: 527
   Google Scholar
• Mowat D. N., Kwain M. L., Winch J. E. Lignification and in vitro cell wall digestibility of plant parts. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1969; 49: 499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allinson D. W., Osborn D. F. The cellulose-lignin complex in forages and its relationship to forage nutrient value. J. Agric. Sci. 1970; 74: 23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves J. B., III. Lignin composition and in vitro digestibility of feeds. J. Anim. Sci. 1985; 60: 316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton F. E., II, Akin D. E. Digestibility of delignified forage cell walls. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1977; 25: 1299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyea R. L., Foster M. B., Zinn G. M. Effect of delignification on in vitro digestion of alfalfa cellulose. J. Dairy Sci. 1983; 66: 1277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford C. W. Effect of partial delignification on the in vitro digestibility of cell wall polysaccharides in Digitaria decumbens (Pangola grass). Austr. J. Agric. Res. 1978; 29: 1157
   Google Scholar
• Morrison I. M. The effect of physical and chemical treatments on the degradation of wheat and barley straws by rumen liquor-pepsin and pepsin-cellulase systems. J. Sci. Food Agric 1983; 34: 1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting L. D., Richardson C. R. and Tock, R. W., Digestibility of ozone-treated sorghum by ruminants. J. Agric. Sci. 1984; 102: 747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung H. J., Vogel K. P. Influence of lignin on digestibility of forage cell wall material. J. Anim. Sci. 1985; 62: 1703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs W., Gerlaugh P., Edgington B. H., Bethke R. M. Influence of corn starch upon roughage digestion in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1949; 8: 271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane E. A., Jacobson W. C., Dame wood P. M., Jr. Effect of corn starch on digestibility of alfalfa hay. J. Dairy Sci. 1959; 42: 849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough M. E. Influence of hay or silage and ratio of flaked corn or beet pulp to forage on cellulose disappearance in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 1968; 27: 780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry R. A., Tilley J. M. A., Outen G. E. Effect of pH on cellulose digestion under in vitro conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric 1969; 20: 317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orskov E. R., Fraser C. The effects of processing of barley-based supplements on rumen pH, rate of digestion, and voluntary intake of dried grass in sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 1975; 34: 493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart C. S. Factors affecting the cellulolytic activity of rumen contents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977; 33: 597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mould F. L., Orskov E. R., Mann S. O. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type of supplementation and influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983/84; 10: 15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. B., Dombrowski D. B. Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980; 39: 604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. B. Effect of extracellular pH on the growth and protonmotive force of Bacteroides succinogenes, a cellulolytic ruminal bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1987; 53: 2379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson P. N. Continuous culture of rumen bacteria: apparatus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1965; 38: 161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kistner A., Van Zyl J. G. Continuous culture of anaerobic rumen bacteria: modification and extension of the cyclone column culture system. Can. J. Microbiol. 1967; 13: 455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafkewicz D., Ianotti E. L., Wolin M. J., Bryant M. P. An anaerobic chemostat that permits the collection and measurement of fermentation gases. Appl. Microbiol 1973; 25: 612
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoover W. H., Crooker B. A., Sniffen C. J. Effects of differential solid-liquid removal rates on protozoa numbers in continuous culture of rumen contents. J. Anim. Sci. 1976; 43: 528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerkawski J. W., Breckenridge G. Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Br. J. Nutr. 1977; 38: 371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah S. M., Stern M. D., Ehle F. R. Evaluation of a dual flow continuous culture system in estimating bacterial fermentation in vivo of mixed diets containing various soya bean products. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 1986; 16: 51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijzen H. J., Zwart K. W., van Gelder P. T., Vogels G. D. Continuous cultivation of rumen organisms, a possible application to the anaerobic degradation of lignocellulosic waste materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1986; 25: 255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistner A., Kornelius J. H., Miller G. S. Kinetic measurement on bacterial cultures growing on fibres. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 1983; 13: 217
   Google Scholar
• Pavlostathis S. G., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Fermentation of insoluble cellulose by continuous cultures of Ruminococcus albus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988; 54: 2655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlostathis S. G., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Kinetics of insoluble cellulose fermentation by continuous cultures of Ruminococcus albus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988; 54: 2660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H., Forsberg C. W. Isolation of a cellodextrinase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987; 53: 1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistner A., Kornelius J. A. A small-scale, three-vessel continuous culture system for quantitative studies of plant fibre degradation by anaerobic bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 1990; 12: 173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., Shi Y., Odt C. L. A segmented gas/liquid delivery system for the continuous culture of microorganisms on insoluble substrates, and its use for growth of Ruminococcus flavefaciens on cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991; 36: 178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover W. H., Kincaid C. R., Varga G. A., Thayne W. V., Junkins L. L., Jr. Effects of solid and liquid flow on fermentation in continuous cultures. IV. pH and dilution rate. J. Anim. Sci. 1984; 58: 692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch A. W. Aerobic Biological Treatment of Wastewaters. Gulf Publishing, Houston 1971
   Google Scholar
• Charackilis W. G. Energetics and stoichiometry. Biofdms, W. G. Charackilis. Interscience. 1990; 161
   Google Scholar
• Pavlostathis S. G., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Cellulose fermentation by continuous cultures of Ruminococcus albus and Methanobrevibacter smithii. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1990; 33: 109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham M. J., Wolin M. J. Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977; 34: 297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldo D. R., Smith L. W., Cox E. L. Models of cellulose disappearance from the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 1972; 55: 125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest P. J. Plant fiber and its role in herbivore nutrition. Cornell Vet. 1977; 67: 307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beveridge R. J., Richards G. N. Digestion of polysaccharide constituents of tropical pasture herbage in the bovine rumen. III. Examination of the celluloses and hemicelluloses of spear grass (Heter-opogon contortus) which resist digestion. Carbohydr. Res. 1973; 28: 39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison M., Mackie R. I., Kistner A. 3-Phenylpropanoic acid improves the affinity of Ruminococcus albus for cellulose in continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 3220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungate R. E., Stack R. J. Phenylpropanoic acid: growth factor for Ruminococcus albus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1982; 44: 79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack R. J., Cotta M. A. Effect of 3-phenylpropanoic acid on growth and cellulose utilization by cellulolytic ruminal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1986; 52: 209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFadden D. L. Cellulose fermentation process. U.S. Patent 4,101,679, 1978
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen M. A., Hespell R. B., White B. A., Bothast R. J. Inhibitory effects of methy(cellulose on cellulose degradation by Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1988; 54: 890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varel V. H., Jung H. G. Influence of forage phenolics on ruminal fibrolytic bacteria and in vitro fiber degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986; 52: 275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin D. E., Rigsby L. L., Theodorou M. K., Hartley R. D. Population changes of fibrolytic bacteria in the presence of phenolic acids and plant extracts. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 1988; 16: 261
   Google Scholar
• Jung H. G., Fahey G. C., Jr. Interactions among phenolic monomers and in vitro fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 1983; 66: 1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung H. G., Sahlu T. Depression of cellulose digestion by esterified cinnamic acids. J. Sci. Food Agric 1986; 37: 659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S. A., Akin D. E. Effect of phenolic monomers on the growth and β-glucosidase activity of Bacteroides rumincola and on the carboxymethylcellulase, β-glucosidase, and xylanase activities of Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1988; 54: 3019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. K., Martin S. A. Xylose uptake by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Environ. Microbiol 1990; 56: 1683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawai A., Kondo T., Ara S. Inhibitory effects of phenolic acid esters on degradability of forage fibers. J. Jpn. Grass. Soc 1983; 29: 175
   Google Scholar
• Windham W. R., Petersen J. C., Terrill T. H. Tannins as anti-quality factors in forage. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 127
   Google Scholar
• Joblin K. N. Bacterial and protozoal interactions with ruminal fungi. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellutose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 311
   Google Scholar
• Bernalier A., Fonty G., Gouet P. Degradation et fermentation de la cellulose par Neocallimastix species seul ou associe a quelques especes bacteriennes du rumen. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1988; 28(Suppl. 1)75
   Google Scholar
• Russell J. B. Fermentation of cellodextrins by cel-lulolytic and noncellulolytic rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985; 49: 572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolin M. J. Rumen fermentation; biochemical interactions between populations of the microbial community. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 237
   Google Scholar
• Scheifinger C. C., Wolin M. J. Propionate formation from cellulose and soluble sugars by combined cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Microbiol. 1973; 26: 789
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanton T. B., Canale-Paroia E. Treponema bryantii sp. nov., a rumen spirochete which interacts with cellulolytic bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 1979; 127: 145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo H., Cheng K.-J., Costerton J. W. Interaction between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987; 33: 244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood T. M. Fungal cellulases. Biosynthesis and Biode gradation of Cellulose, C. H. Haigler, P. J. Wei-Mer. Marcel Dekker, New York 1990; 491
   Google Scholar
• Reese E. T., Siu R. G. H., Levinson H. S. The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J. Bacteriol. 1950; 59: 485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong E., Greenwood J. M., Gilkes N. R., Kilburn D. G., Miller R. G., Jr., Warren R. A. J. The cellulose-binding domains of cellulases: tools for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1989; 7: 239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer R. F., Redmond M. A. Effect of chemical modification of cellulose on the activity of a cellulase from Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983; 25: 1311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg C. W., Beveridge T. J., Hellstrom A. Cellulase and xylanase release in Bacteroides succinogenes and its importance in the rumen environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981; 42: 886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groleau D., Forsberg C. W. Cellulolytic activity of the rumen bacterium Bacteroides succinogenes. Can. J. Microbiol. 1981; 27: 517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGavin M. J., Lam J., Forsberg C. W. Regulation and distribution of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 endoglucanases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teather R. M. Structure of β-glucanase genes from rumen bacteria. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 377
   Google Scholar
• Gawthorne J. M. Extracellular carbohydrase complex from rumen contents. Ann. Rech. Vet. 1979; 10: 249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamed R., Setter E., Kenig R., Bayer E. A. The cellulosome — a discrete cell surface organelle which exhibits separate antigenic., cellulose-binding, and various cellulolytic activities. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. Ser. 1983; 13: 163
   Google Scholar
• Millet J., Petre D., Beguin P., Raynaud O., Aubert J.-P. Cloning often distinct fragments of Clostridium thermocellum DNA encoding for cellulases. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1985; 29: 149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanie C. M. P. M., Clarke N. G., Hazlewood G. P. Molecular cloning of Clostridium thermocellum DNA and the expression of further novel endo-β-1,4-glucanase genes in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987; 133: 1297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamed R., Naimark J., Morgenstern E., Bayer E. A. Specialized cell surface structures in cellulolytic bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1987; 169: 3792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron J., Yokoyama M. T., Lamed R. Bacterial cell surface structures involved in lucerne cell wall degradation by pure cultures of cellulolytic rumen bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989; 32: 218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudet G., Gaillard B. Vesicle formation and cellulose degradation by Bacteroides succinogenes: ultrastructural aspects. Arch. Microbiol. 1987; 148: 150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner R. M., Doerner K. C., White B. A. Purification and characterization of an exo-β-1,4-glucanase from Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1. J. Bacteriol. 1987; 169: 4581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg C. W., Cheng K.-J. Integration of rumen microorganisms and their hydrolytic enzymes during the digestion of lignocellulosic materials. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 411
   Google Scholar
• Huang L., Forsberg C. W., Thomas D. Y. Purification and characterization of a chloride-stimulated cellobiosidase from Bacteroides succinogenes S85. J. Bacteriol. 1988; 170: 2923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettipher G. L., Latham M. J. Production of enzymes degrading plant ceil walls and fermentation of cellobiose by Ruminoeoccus flavefaciens in batch and continuous culture. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1979; 110: 29
   Google Scholar
• Huang L., Forsberg C. W. Purification and comparison of the periplasmic and extracellular forms of the cellodextrinase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988; 54: 1488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiltner P., Dehority B. A. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983; 46: 642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe S. E., Theodorou M. K., Trinci A. P. J. Cellulases and xylanases of an anaerobic rumen fungus grown on wheat straw holocellulose, cellulose, and xylan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987; 53: 1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. G., Orpin C. G. Glycoside hydrolases formed by three species of rumen fungi grown on a range of carbohydrate substrates. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987; 33: 418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood T. M., McCrae S. I., Wilson C. A., Bhat K. M., Gow L. A. Aerobic and anaerobic fungal cellulases, with special reference to their mode of attack on crystalline cellulose. Biochemistry and Genetics of Cellulose Degradation, J.-P. Aubert, P. Beguin, J. Millet. Academic Press, London 1988; 31
   Google Scholar
• Barichievich E. B., Calza R. E. Supernatant protein and cellulase activities of anaerobic ruminal fungus Neocallimastix frontalis EB188. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 56: 43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calza R. E. Cellulases from Neocallimastix frontalis EB188 synthesized in the presence of protein glycosylation inhibitors: measurement of protein molecular weights and isoelectric focusing values. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1991; 35: 748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X., Calza R. E. Cellulases from Neocallimastix frontalis EB188 synthesized in the presence of glycosylation inhibitors: measurement of pH and temperature optima, protease and ion sensitivities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991; 35: 741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X., Calza R. E. Purification and characterization of an extracellular β-glucosidase from the rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis EB188. Enzyme Microb. Techno/. 1991; 13: 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calza R. E. Nascent synthesis and secretion of cellobiase in Neocallimastix frontalis EB188. Curr. Microbiol 1991; 23: 175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. G., Ellis A. B., Coleman G. S. Subcellular distribution of polysaccharide depolymerase and glycoside hydrolase enzymes in rumen ciliate protozoa. Curr. Microbiol., 13: 139, 186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J. B., Wilson D. B. Potential opportunities and problems for genetically altered rumen microorganisms. J. Nutr. 1987; 118: 271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hespell R. B. Problems and progress with the genetics of ruminal bacteria. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1989; 30: 13
   Google Scholar
• Gilkes N. R., Warren R. A. J., Miller R. C., Jr., Kilburn D. J. Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 10401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGavin M., Forsberg C. W. Catalytic and substrate binding domains of endoglucanase 2 from Bacteroides succinogenes. J. Bacterial. 1989; 171: 3310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., Weston W. M., Chou Y.-C., Chase D. B. Effect of supercritical ammonia on the physical and chemical structure of ground wood. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. Ser. 1986; 17: 5
   Google Scholar
• Millet M. A., Baker A. J., Feist W. C., Mellenberger R. W., Satter L. D. Modifying wood to increase its in vitro digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 1980; 31: 781
   Google Scholar
• Jackson M. G. Review article: the alkali treatment of straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1977; 2: 105
   Google Scholar
• Itoh H., Terashima Y., Tohrai N. Evaluation of ammonia treatment for improving the utilization of fibrous materials in low-quality roughages. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 1979; 50: 54
   Google Scholar
• Graham H., Aman P. A comparison between degradation in vitro and in sacco of constituents of untreated and ammonia treated barley straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983; 10: 199, /84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams P. E. V. Digestibility studies on ammonia treated straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983/84; 10: 213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison I. M., Brice R. E. The digestion of untreated and ammonia-treated barley straw in an artificial rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1983/84; 10: 229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou Y.-C. Supercritical ammonia pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. Ser. 1986; 17: 19
   Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J., Chou Y.-C. T. Anaerobic fermentation of woody biomass pretreated with supercritical ammonia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986; 52: 733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould J. M. Alkaline hydrogen peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984; 26: 46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerley M. S., Fahey G. C., Jr., Berger L. L., Gould J. M., Baker F. L. Alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment unlocks energy in agricultural byproducts. Science 1985; 230: 820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould J. M. Studies on the mechanism of alkaline hydrogen peroxide delignification of agricultural residues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerley M. S., Garleb K. A., Fahey G. C., Jr., Berger L. L., Moore K. J., Phillips G. N., Gould J. M. Effects of alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment of cotton and wheat straw on cellulose crystallinity and on composition and site and extent of disappearance of wheat straw cell wall phenolics and monosaccharides by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1988; 66: 3235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron M. G., Cameron M. R., Fahey G. C., Jr., Clark J. H., Berger L. L., Merchen N. R. Effects of treating oat hulls with alkaline hydrogen peroxide on intake and digestion by mid-lactation dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor J. J. Ammonia explosion pulping: a new fiber separation process. TAPPI 1972; 55: 353
   Google Scholar
• Puri V. P., Mamers H. Explosive pretreat-ment of lignocellulosic residues with high-pressure carbon dioxide for the production of fermentation substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983; 25: 3149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David C., Fornasier R., Greindl-Fallon C., Vanlautem N. Enzymatic hydrolysis and bacterian hydrolysis — fermentation of eucalyptus wood pre-treated with sodium hypochlorite. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985; 27: 1591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehority B. A., Scott H. W., Johnson R. R. Estimation of forage nutritive value from cellulose digestibilities obtained with pure cultures of cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 1968; 51: 567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J. M. Genetic engineering of low-lignin pasture plants. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 215
   Google Scholar
• Cherney J. H. Normal and brown midrib mutations in relation to improved lignocellulose utilization. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 205
   Google Scholar
• Egan A. R. Strategies in modification of plant attributes and rumen environment to increase utilization of lignocellulose. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 33
   Google Scholar
• Teather R. M. Application of gene manipulation to the rumen microflora. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1985; 65: 563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg C. W., Crosby B., Thomas D. Y. Potential for manipulation of the rumen fermentation through the use of recombinant DNA techniques. J. Anim. Sci. 1986; 63: 310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson J. A. Prospects for establishment of genetically engineered microorganisms in the rumen. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1989; 11: 187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmiya K., Hishino C., Shimuzu S. Cellulose-dependent and penicillin-resistant plasmids isolated from Ruminococcus albus. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 1989; 2: 501
   Google Scholar
• Flint H. J., Thompson A. M., Bisset J. Plasmid-associated transfer of tetracycline resistance in Bacteroides ruminocola. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988; 54: 855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann S. P., Hazlewood G. P., Orpin C. G. Characterization of a cryptic plasmid (pOMl) in Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens by restriction endonuclease analysis and its cloning in Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol. 1986; 13: 17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmundson R. V., Kelly W. J. Isolation and characterization of plasmid DNA from Ruminococcus. Curr. Microbiol. 1987; 16: 97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint H. J., Stewart C. S. Antibiotic resistance patterns and plasmids of ruminal strains of Bacteroides ruminicola and Bacteroides multiacidus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1987; 26: 450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S. A., Dean R. G. Characterization of a plasmid from the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990; 55: 3035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker N. B., Anderson K. L., Smithson S. L., Wang G.-R., Salyers A. A. Conjugal transfer of a shuttle vector from the human colonic anaerobe Bacteroides uniformis to the ruminal anaerobe Prevotella (Bacteroides) ruminicola. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991; 57: 2114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson A. M., Flint H. J. Electroporation induced transformation of Bacteroides ruminicola and Bacteroides uniformis by plasmid DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1989; 61: 101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth R. A., Friesenegger A., Fielder S. Transformation of various Gram-negative bacteria belonging to 11 different genera by electroporation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1989; 216: 175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregg K., Ware C. E. Importance of genetic diversity in manipulation of rumen bacteria. Microbial and Plant Opportunities to Improve Lignocellulose Utilization in Ruminants, D. E. Akin, L. G. Ljungdahl, J. R. Wilson, P. J. Harris. Elsevier, New York 1990; 357
   Google Scholar
• Weimer P. J. Growth of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 in cellulose-limited continuous culture. Abstr. 21st Conf. Rumen Function. Chicago 1991; 28
   Google Scholar