An Examination of Preference for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices with Two Boys with Significant Intellectual Disabilities

References

• Beukelman, D. R., Mirenda, P. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, A., Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, H. I., O'Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E. (2005). Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone, F. J., Graff, R. B., Ahearn, W. H. (2007). Long-term stability of edible preferences in individual with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 22, 223–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyrano Communicator™. Retrieved 19 February 2009 from: http://www.cyranocommunicator.com/Cyrano_Pricing.htm
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format reinforcer preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A., Roscoe, E. M. (1997). Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, J. E. (2001). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Duker, P. C., Dortmans, A., Lodder, E. (1993). Establishing the manding function of communicative gestures with individuals with severe/profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 39–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M. (1997). Examiner's manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd edn. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. L. (1994). Is communication really the point? Some thoughts on interventions and membership. Mental Retardation, 32, 7–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartman, D. P., Hall, V. R. (1976). The changing criterion design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 527–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. D., Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple probe baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, M. E., Weiss, J. S., Bancroft, S., Ahearn, W. H. (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on the acquisition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mini-MessageMate™ on Words +. Retrieved 19 February 2009 from: http://www.words-plus.com/website/products/hand/mm.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, D. R. (2008). AAC intervention for autism: A research summary. International Journal of Special Education, 23, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Sigafoos, J., Piche, L. (1989). Teaching an adolescent with blindness and severe disabilities a correspondence between requesting and selecting. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seybert, S., Dunlap, G., Ferro, J. (1996). The effects of choice making on the problem behaviors of high school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J. (2006). Self-determination: Can we let the child determine the ‘best’ treatment? Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 1–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Strategies for beginning communicators. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Ganz, J., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Schlosser, R. (2007). Assessing correspondence following acquisition of an exchange-based communication system. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., Payne, D., Son, S. H., O'Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E. (2009). A comparison of picture exchange and speech generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Kook, A. M. (1992). Obtaining a correspondence between requesting and selecting preferred objects. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 20, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., Ganz, J. B., Lancioni, G. E., Schlosser, R. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology and Disability, 17, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Roberts-Pennell, D. (1999). Wrong-item format: A promising intervention for teaching socially appropriate forms of rejecting to children with developmental disabilities? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., Tucker, M., Roberts-Pennell, D., Pittendreigh, N. (2000). Assessment of potential communication acts in three individuals with Rett syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 12, 203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, S. H., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soto, G., Belfoire, P. J., Schlosser, C. H., Haynes, C. (1993). Teaching specific requests: A comparative analysis of skill acquisition and preference using two augmentative and alternative communication aids. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, J., Mochizuki, A. (1988). Acquisition and functional analysis of manding with autistic students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar