Translucency and Learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking Children: An Exploration

References

• Alant, E. (2005a). Issues in graphic symbol communication. In E. Alant, L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication and severe disabilities. Beyond poverty ( pp. 108–130). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Alant, E. (2005b). Cultural and socio-economic influences of communication. In E. Alant, L.L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication and severe disabilities. Beyond poverty ( pp. 95–107). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Anycom. (2005). WinBliss – The Bliss tool. Retrieved 8 February 2007 from: http://www.anycom.se/archives/products_software/winbliss/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidson, H. A., Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Vocabulary selection. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices ( pp. 199–213). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Basson, M., Alant, E. (2005). The iconicity and ease of learning of Picture Communication Symbols: A study with Afrikaans-speaking children. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 4–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blachowics, C. L. Z. (1994). Problem-solving strategies for academic success. In G. P. Wallach, K. G. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some principles and applications. New York: Macmillan College.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R. (1997). Terminology issues. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices ( pp. 38–42. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bracken, B. A., Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psycho-educational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, S.J. (2004). Multicultural issues in augmentative and alternative communication and language: Research to practice. Topics in Language Disorders, 24(1), 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis, J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol.2. Methodology ( pp. 32–444. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1977). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Part two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. R. (1981). Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss and Carrier. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 46, 191–196.
   Google Scholar
• Deregowski, J. B. (1973). Illusion and culture. In R. L. Gregory, E. H. Gombrich (Eds.), Illusion in Nature and Art ( pp. 161–192. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Deregowski, J. B. Multrow, E. S., Multrow, W. F. (1972). Pictorial recognition in a remote Ethiopian population. Perception 1972(1), 417–425.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, H. F., Gourlay, N., Hudson, W. (1973). A study of pictorial perception among Bantu and white primary school children in South Africa. Human Sciences Research Council Publication Series No 31. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Preez, A. E. (2006). The translucency values of Blissymbols as rated by typically developing Setswana learners Unpublished masters thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L. (1991). Towards common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(3), 215–220.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., Stratton, M. M. (1997). Aided AAC Symbols. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and practices. ( pp. 48–79. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Nonspeech communication. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (2nd ed.) ( pp. 401–430. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond cultureNew York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt, L., Alant, E. (2002). The iconicity of selected picture communication symbols for rural Zulu-speaking children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 49, 40–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1989). Ways with words. Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (2003). Individuals from diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds may perceive graphic symbols differently: Response to Nigam. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 137–140.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research ( pp. 295–306. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Karlan, G. R., Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (1995). Obtaining translucency values for 910 Blissymbols: A research report. Unpublished Manuscript, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Martlew, M., Connolly, K. J. (1996). Human figure drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 67, 2743–2762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. T. (1980). Teaching and using Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1990). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education. A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbolics, PCS and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Moolman, E., Alant, E. (1997). The teaching of Blissymbols as a bridge into literacy for children with cognitive impairments: A comparison of two training approaches. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 73–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Newell, A. F., Alm, N., Waller, A. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system? – A cross-cultural study of picture-based sentences constructed by English and Japanese speakers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(2), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Nigham, R. (2003). Do individuals from diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds perceive graphic symbols differently. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 135–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, D. (1982). Orality and literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pena, E. D. (2005). Lost in translation: Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development, 78(4), 1255–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Quist, R. W., Lloyd, L. L., van Balkom, H., Welle-Donker Gimbrere, M., Vander Beken, K. (1998, June). Blissymbol translucency values across cultures. Paper presented at the 8th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Retief, A. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment. (Research Report Series – HSRC Investigation into research methodology, 6). Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Sigel, I. E. (1978). The development of pictorial comprehension. In B. S. Randhawa, W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking and communication ( pp. 93–111. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Huer, M., Taylor, O. (1997). Multicultural issues. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and practices ( pp. 406–413. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., Linfoot, K. (1996). Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 244–255.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO world languages report survey questionnaire. (2008). Retrieved 2 April 2008 from: http://www.salang uages.com/unesco/northernsotho.htm
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: An introduction ( pp. 49–69. Rockville: ASHA.
   Google Scholar
• Wachs, T. D. (2000). Necessary but not sufficient. The respective roles of single and multiple influences on individual development. Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Kangas, K. (1997). Intervention principles and procedures. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and practices ( pp. 235–253. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar