Analyzing Written Communication in AAC Contexts: A Statistical Perspective

References

• Allen, J. F., Swift, M., & de Beaumont, W. (2008), Deep semantic analysis of text. Semantics in Text Processing: STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings, 1, 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• Amrani, A., Azey, J., Heitzy, T., Kodratoffy, I., & Rochey.M. (2004). From the texts to the concepts they contain: A chain of linguistic treatments. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 712–722.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. R. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Exploring quantitative aspects of lexical structure. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Ac. Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Bécue, M., Lebart, L., & Rajadell, N. (Eds.) (1992). JADT 1990: Jornades Internacionals d’Anàlisi de Dades Textuals, Barcelona, Spain: ELS - Universitat de Barcelona [JADT 1990. International Conference on Analysis of Textual Data].
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analyisis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1948). The analysis of communication content. Chicago/New York: University of Chicago and Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (1998). Text analysis: Qualitative and quantitative measures. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 595–646). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L. (Ed.). (2008). Il delta dei significati. Rome, Italy: Carocci. [The delta of meanings].
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., & Tuzzi, A. (2011). Statistical analysis of textual data from corpora of written communication. New results from an Italian interdisciplinary program (EASIEST). In: M. H. Mohammadi (Ed.), A Comprehensive book on Autism Spectrum Discorders. Rijeka, HR: InTech Pubb (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D., & Burke, J. (2006). Presuming competence. Equity and Excellence in Education, 39, 166–175.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D., & Cardinal, D. (Eds.) (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolasco, S., Baiocchi, F., & Morrone, A. (2010). Taltac2: Lexical and textual automatic treatment for Content analysis of a corpus (ver. 2.8.0.2) [Software]. Trattamento Automatico Lessicale e Testuale per l’Analisi del Contenuto di un Corpus. Rome, Italy. Retrieved from: http://www.taltac.it
   Google Scholar
• Bolasco, S., Chiari, I., & Giuliano, L. (Eds.). (2010). Statistical analysis of textual data. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference JADT - Journées d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles. Milano, Italy: LED.
   Google Scholar
• Bolasco, S., Morrone, A., & Baiocchi, F. (1999). A paradigmatic path for statistical content analysis using an integrated package of textual data treatment. In M. Vichi & O. Opitz (Eds.), Classification and data analysis. Theory and application (pp. 237–246). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cortelazzo, M., & Tuzzi, A. (2008). Metodi statistici applicati all’italiano [Statistical methods applied to Italian]. Bologna, Italy: Zanichelli.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, R. (1997). Speechless: Facilitating communication for people without voices. New York, NY: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, R., & McDonald, A. (1984). Annie’s coming out. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992). Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duràn, P., Malvern, D., Richards, B., & Chipere, N. (2004). Developmental trends in lexical diversity. Applied Linguistics, 25, 220–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. (1980). Cluster analysis. New York, NY: Halsted press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. J. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, P. (1960). Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique linguistique [Problems and methods of statistics for linguistics]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Guoa, Y., Shaoa, Z., & Hua, N. (2010). Automatic text categorization based on content analysis with cognitive situation models. Information Sciences, 180(5), 613–630.
   Google Scholar
• Heiden, S., & Pincemin, B. (Eds.) (2008). JADT 2008. Actes des 9es Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles [JADT 2008. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Textual Data statistical Analysis]. Lyon, France: Presses universitaires de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Herdan, G. (1956). Language as choice and chance. Groningen, The Netherlands: Noordhoff Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., & Altmann, G. (2009). Problems in quantitative linguistics 2. Lüdenscheid, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• La Noce, M., Bolasco, S., Allegra, E., Ruocco, V., & Capo, F. M. (2006). Merger control in Italy 1995–2003: A statistical study of the enforcement practice by mining the text of Authority resolutions. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(2), 307–334.
   Google Scholar
• Labbé, C., & Labbé, D. (2001). Inter-textual distance and authorship attribution Corneille and Moliére. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Labbé, D. (2007). Experiments on authorship attribution by intertextual distance in English. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 14, 33–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancashire, I., & Hirst, G. (2009, March). Vocabulary changes in Agatha Christie’s mysteries as an indication of dementia: A case study. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference on Cognitive Aging: Research and Practice, Toronto. Retrieved from: http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Lancashire+Hirst-extabs-2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the world war. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. A framework for political inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D., & Leites, N. (1949). Language of politics: Studies in quantitative semantics. New York, NY: George Stuart.
   Google Scholar
• Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Warwick, K. M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis. Correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Berry, L. (1998). Exploring textual data. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Ac. Pub. (ed. orig.: Lebart, L., & Salem, A. (1994). Statistique textuelle. Paris, France: Dunod).
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2008). A back door approach to autism and AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 220–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(3), 287–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller, C. (1968). Initiation à la statistique linguistique [Introduction to statistics for linguistics]. Paris, France: Larousse.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, F. (2005). Correspondence analysis and data coding with Java and R. London, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, J., & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case. Mental Retardation, 40(5), 347–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauli, F., & Tuzzi, A. (2009). The end of year addresses of the presidents of the Italian Republic (1948–2006): Discoursal similarities and differences. Glottometrics, 18, 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, I. de S. (Ed.). (1956). Trends in content analysis. Illinois, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, I.-I. (2009). Word frequency studies. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (ver. 2.8.1) [software]. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. Retrieved from: http://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. W. (1949). A statistical approach to quantitative linguistic analysis. Word, V, 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. W. (2000). A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis. Quality & Quantity, 34, 259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, U., Fan, F., & Altmann, G. (2008). Problems in quantitative linguistics. Lüdenscheid, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Gallagher, T.M., Morford, J.P., & Shahnaz, N. (2002). Interpretation of graphic symbol utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzzi, A. (2003). L’analisi del contenuto. Introduzione ai metodi e alle tecniche di ricerca [Content analysis. An introduction to research methods and techniques]. Rome, Italy: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in texts written by individuals with autism: A statistical analysis of a large Italian corpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(5), 373–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuzzi, A., Popescu, I.-I., & Altmann, G. (2010). Quantitative analysis of Italian texts. Lüdenscheid, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yule, G. U. (1939). On sentence length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose, with applications to two cases of disputed authorship. Biometrika, 30, 363–390.
   Google Scholar
• Yule G. U. (1944). The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (2005). Denotative text analysis. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 423–446). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar