Effects of Varying Lengths of Synthetic Speech Output on Augmented Requesting and Natural Speech Production in an Adolescent with Klinefelter Syndrome

References

• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3 rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., Lombardino, L. J., & Dyson, A. T. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brady, N. C., & Halle, J. W. (2002). Breakdowns and repairs in conversations between beginning AAC users and their partners. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, & J. C. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC ( pp. 323–351). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Duker, P. C., Didden, R., & Sigafoos, J. (2004). One-to-one training: Instructional procedures for learners with developmental disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Grow, L. L., Kelley, M. E., Roane, H. S., & Shillingsberg, M. A. (2008). Utility of extinction-induced response variability for the selection of mands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Patel, M. R. (2002). The effects of interpolated reinforcement on resistance to extinction in children diagnosed with autism: A preliminary investigation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 61–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos,J., & Didden,R. (2007). PECS and VOCA to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2009). Promising interventions in AAC for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 112–113.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli,M., Franco, J., van der Meer, L., Lang, R., & Camargo, S. P. H. (2010). The use of speech-generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 281–285.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., & Behrman, M. M. (1996). Acquisition and functional use of voice output communication by persons with profound multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 20, 451–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003a). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. Boston: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003b). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2001). Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., & Koul, R. K. (2009). Speech output and speech-generating devices in autism spectrum disorders. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders and AAC ( pp. 141–169). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., Luiselli, J. K., Angermeier, K., Harasymowyz, U., Schooley, K., & Belfiore, P. J. (2007). Effects of synthetic speech output on requesting and natural speech production in children with autism: A preliminary study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2003). Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 37–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D., Sigafoos, J., Schlosser, R. W., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2010). Are speech-generating devices viable AAC options for adults with intellectual disabilities? In J. Mullennix & S. Stern (Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment ( pp. 161–176). Hershey, NY: Medical Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Lang,R., Rispoli, M., Herrington,C., & Sigafoos,J. (in press). Teaching functional use of an iPod-based speech-generating device to students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., & Rispoli,M. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar