Parachute Without a Ripcord: The Skydive of Communication Interaction

References

• Allaire, J. H., & Gressard, R. P. (1992). Communication technology and consumer input. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 34, 87–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arvidsson, P., Granlund, M., & Thyberg, M. (2008). Factors related to self-rated participation in adolescents and adults with mild intellectual disability − A systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 277–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Parette, H., Stoner, J., Angell, M., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., Berg, N., & Waller, A. (2006). Assessing the loneliness of older people with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballin, L., & Balandin, S. (2007). An exploration of loneliness: Communication and the social networks of older people with cerebral palsy. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D., Chung, Y., & Lever, S. (2010, June). What you might not find in a typical transition plan! Some important lessons from adults who rely on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 977–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2008). Metaphors in qualitative research: Shedding light or casting shadows? Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 274–282.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., McConachie, H., Price, K., & Wood, P. (2001). Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, S. S., Stone, V., Panchura, C., & Usiak, D. (2002). The meaning of communication: Experiences with augmentative communication devices. Rehabilitation Nursing, 27, 215–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dollaghan, C.A. (2007). The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P., John, A., & Petheram, B. (2006). Therapy outcome measures for rehabilitation professions: Speech and language therapy; physiotherapy; occupational therapy; rehabilitation nursing and hearing therapists (2nd ed.). London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. L. (1994). Is communication really the point? Some thoughts on interventions and membership. Mental Retardation, 32, 7–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson, B., Darrah, J., Cameron, D., Hashemi, G., Kingsnorth, S., Lepage, C., et al. (2009). Revisiting therapy assumptions in children’s rehabilitation: Clinical and research implications. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 1446–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenny, C., & Stolee, P. (2009). Comparing the FIM and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: A review of the literature. BMC Geriatrics, 9, 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). “Pushes and pulls” on parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, D. W., & Gorenflo C. W. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes towards nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 19–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granlund, M., Björck-Åkesson, E., Wilder, J., & Ylvén, R. (2008). AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Blackstone, S. (1999). Outcomes measurement in AAC. In L. F. J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice ( pp. 207–228.). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1999). Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 134–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, A. (2011). Therapy outcome measures: Where are we now? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 13, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk, T., & Sherman, R. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H., & Cloutier, G., Levert M. J. (2008). Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury, 22, 535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communication competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference? The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15,13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2001). Attitudes of children towards augmentative and alternative communication systems. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 48, 45–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund, S. K. (2001). Fifteen years later: Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Unpublished PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2006). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use AAC: Part I− What is a “good” outcome? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007a). Long term outcomes for individuals who use AAC: Part II− Expressive communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007b). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use AAC: Part III− Factors contributing to outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsen, S. M., Wei, G., & Wasserman, D. (2009). A reliability analysis of goal attainment scaling weights. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, F., Markova, I., Murphy, J., Moodie, E., & Collins, S. (1997). Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 235–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability and Society, 24, 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Marková, I., Collins, S., & Moodie, E. (1996). AAC systems: Obstacles to effective use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pape, T. L.-B., Kim, J., & Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, A., Morris, M., Unsworth, C., Duckett, S., Skeat, J., Dodd, K., et al. (2004). Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: The AusTOMs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. (2005). Living in the state of stuck: How assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., Jutai, J. W., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & DeRuyter, F. (2007). A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2, 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2004). Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: A critical review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 217–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2006). Evidence-based practice for AAC practitioners. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Connolly, I. (2008). Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 3, 260–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Slot, W. M., Nieuwenhuijsen, C., Van den Berg-Emons, R. J., Wensink-Boonstra, A. E., Stam, H. J., & Roebroeck, M. E. (2010). Participation and health-related quality of life in adults with spastic bilateral cerebral palsy and the role of self-efficacy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar