Traditional Versus Computerized Presentation and Response Methods on a Structured AAC Assessment Tool

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, D., & Fristoe, M. (1988). Effects of test adaptations on test performance. Presentation at the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (2006). Test of aided-communication symbol performance. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (2007). Using the TASP for AAC assessment and goal setting. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw-Hill (2003, April). The computer-based or online administration of paper-and pencil tests. Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://www.ctb.com/ctb.com/control/researchArticleMainAction?articleId=665&p=ctbResearch
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Geytenbeek, J. J. M., Heim, M. M. J., Vermeulen, R. J., & Oostrom, K. J. (2010). Assessing comprehension of spoken language in nonspeaking children with cerebral palsy: Application of a newly developed computer-based instrument. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaf, R., Duncan, B., Skarakis-Doyle, E., Carew, M., & Kapitan, P. (1999). Computer-based language assessment software: The effects of presentation and response format. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 68–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, G., McDougall, J., & Russell, D. (2000). Rethinking the use of research knowledge and evidence by therapists and managers in pediatric rehabilitation. Facts to Go. London, ON: Thames Valley Children’s Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., & Hess, J. L. (2003). Statistical design and analysis of experiments: With applications to engineering and science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• McFadd, E., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in the design of aided visual displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 136–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., & Garland, K. (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51, 1352–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, L. A., & Zangari, C. (2009). Language assessment for students who use AAC. In G. Soto C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy & academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 47–69). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Puhan, G., Boughton, K., & Kim, S. (2007). Examining differences in examinee performance in paper and pencil and computerized testing. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran S., Lundy J., & Coons, S. (2008). Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and touch-screen versions of the EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ VAS). Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 17(8), 1117–1120. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9384-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2010). Statistics for evidence-based practice and evaluation (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2005). The centrality of practice to evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerahandi, S. (2004). Generalized inference in repeated measures: Exact methods in MANOVA and mixed models. Millburn, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Snell, J. (2011). Facilitating children’s ability to distinguish symbols for emotions: The effects of background color cues and spatial arrangement of symbols on accuracy and speed of search. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 288–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar