Considerations for the Composition of Visual Scene Displays: Potential Contributions of Information from Visual and Cognitive Sciences

References

• Barton, A., Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by preschool-age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds), Perceptual Organization (pp. 213–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (2005). What are Visual Scene Displays? Augmentative Communication News, 1; see: http://www.imakenews.com/aac-rerc/e_article000344804.cfm?x=b11,0,w
   Google Scholar
• Bloomburg, K., Karlan, G., & Lloyd, L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented by five graphic symbols and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bower, T. G. R. (1977). A primer of infant development. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25, 725–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bopp, K. D., Brown, K. E., & Mirenda, P. (2004). Speech-language pathologists’ roles in the delivery of positive behavior support for individuals with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 5–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco, F., & Chiorri, C. (2009). People have the power: Priority of socially relevant stimuli in a change detection task. Cognitive Processes, 10, 41–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, J. (2003). Natural scenes upset the visual applecart. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 7–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Drew, A., & Cox, A. (2003). Predicting outcomes in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 265–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzet, S. M., Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2010). Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M., Ambrosi, D. M., Berniger, T. M., & Mitchell, J. O. (1986). Augmentative communication aid use – A follow-up study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., Hux, K., Beukelman, D., Wallace, S., & Weissling, K. (2006, November). Integrating contextual relevant visual scenes into aphasia interventions. Paper presented at the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, Miami FL.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., Curran-Speltz, J., Fallon, K., & Jeffries, L. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 ½-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., Carlson, R., D’Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year olds. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148.
   Google Scholar
• Fei-Fei, L., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2005). Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli. Visual Cognition, 12, 893–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Findlay, J. M., Leekam, S. R., & Benson, V. (2008). Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene. Perception, 571–583.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Benson, V., Frank, M. C., & Findlay, J. M. (2009). Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 47, 248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. (1997). Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Lloyd, L. (1987). A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gliga, T., Elsabbagh, M., Andravizou, A., & Johnson, M. (2009). Faces attract infants’ attention in complex displays. Infancy, 14, 550–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 13, 155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K. A. (1980). Why do babies find faces attractive? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 5, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, B. I., Iwata, B.A., & Green, J.D. (1982). Nonvocal language acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabilities: Blissymbol versus iconic stimulus formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience for aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., & Reichle, J. (1993). Designing and implementing interventions to decrease problem behaviors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 24, 225–235.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. M., Brandon, K., Connolly, C., Wolfe, J., & Horowitz, T. S. (2009). Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder? Developmental Science, 12, 1083–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, C., Kording, K. P., & Konig, P. (2004). Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 468–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, S., Watt, R. J., & Bruce, V. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Drager, K. (2008, August). Evidence-based AAC interventions to build language and communication skills with infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Seminar presented at the annual conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Drager, K. (2010, November). Effects of early AAC intervention for children with Down syndrome. Miniseminar presented at the Annual Conference of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Parrish, C., Parsons, A., Rhoads, S., Welliver, M. M. (2004). Performance of typically developing four and five year old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, M., Saulnier, C., Fein, D., & Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Sensory and attention abnormalities in autistic spectrum disorders. Autism: The International Journal of Research & Practice, 10, 155–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, S. C., & Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, T., & Walker, P. (2003). Autism and a deficit in broadening the spread of visual attention. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 44, 274–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M. L., Hux, K., Dietz, A., Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word-picture matching by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Iacono, T. (Eds.) (2009). Autism spectrum disorders and AAC. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Reichle, J. (1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 627–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M., Reichle, J., Ratcliff, A., & Esser, J. (1994). Effects of selection techniques and array sizes on short-term visual memory. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge: Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598–16603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelen, M., Fei-Fei, L., & Kastner, S. (2009). Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature (letters), 460, 94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson, N. J., Reznick, J. S., Paul, G., Goldman, B. D., & Piven, J. (2002). Visual scanning of faces in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 49–261.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plaisted, K., O’Riordan, M., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 765–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 733–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J., & Clark, J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008). Viewing it differently: Social scene perception in Williams syndrome and Autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855–2860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009). Looking at movies and cartoons: Eye tracking evidence from Williams Syndrome and autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 169–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, 101–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M., Finelli, J., Marvin, A., Garrett-Mayer, E., Bauman, M., & Landa, R. (2007). Response to joint attention in toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: A prospective study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, K., Munson, J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G. (2006). Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: Joint attention, imitation, and toy play. Journal of Autism & Development Disorders, 36, 993–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturino, M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1992). Information tradeoffs in complex stimulus structure: Local and global levels in naturalistic scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 425–436.
   Google Scholar
• Warreyn, P., Roeyers, H., Van Wetswinkel, U., & De Groote, I. (2007). Temporal coordination of joint attention behavior in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 501–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, N., Wetherby, A., & Shumway, S. (2006). Prelinguistic predictors of language outcome at 3 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1224–1237.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherby, A. M. (2006). Understanding and measuring social communication in children with autism spectrum disorders. In T. Charman & W. Stone (Eds.), Social and communication development in autism spectrum disorders: Early identification, diagnosis, and intervention (pp. 3–34). New York: uilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (1993). The Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, H., & Lovaas, O. (1976). Stimulus overselectivity: A common feature in autism and mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Hennig, S. (2007). State of the art and current recommended practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 58–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of visual cognitive neuroscience to AAC display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2011). Observation of humans in naturalistic visual scenes: Implications for the design of symbols and displays for use in aided AAC interventions. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research (Language), 54, 1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., & McDuffie, A. S. (2006). Treatment of responding to and initiating joint attention. In T. Charman & W. Stone (Eds.), Social and communication development in autism spectrum disorders (pp. 117–142). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar