1,717
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reading Instruction for Children who use AAC: Considerations in the Pursuit of Generalizable Results

, &
Pages 160-170 | Received 12 Sep 2011, Accepted 02 Jun 2012, Published online: 04 Sep 2012

References

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. National outcomes measurement system (NOMS). Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.asha.org/members/research/noms/
  • Baer, J., Kutner, M., & Sabatini, J. (2009). Basic reading skills and the literacy of America’s least literate adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) supplemental studies. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Blischak, D. M. (1994). Phonologic awareness: Implications for individuals with little or no functional speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 245–254. doi:10.1080/07434619412331276950.
  • Blischak, D. M., Shah, S. D., Lombardino, L. J., & Chiarella, K. (2004). Effects of phonemic awareness instruction on the encoding skills of children with severe speech impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1295–1304. doi: 10.1080/09638280412331280325.
  • Card, R., & Dodd, B. (2006). The phonological awareness abilities of children with cerebral palsy who do not speak. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 149–159. doi: 10.1080/07434610500431694.
  • Coleman-Martin, M. B., Heller, K. W., Cihak, D. F., & Irvine, K. L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80–90. doi: 10.1177/10883576050200020401.
  • Dowden, P. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–59. doi: 10.1080/07434619712331277838.
  • Erickson, K. A. (2005). Literacy and persons with developmental disabilities: Why and how? Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2006, Literacy for Life.
  • Erickson, K. A., & Hanser, G. A. (2007). Literacy through unity: Word study. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich.
  • Erickson, K. A., Koppenhaver, D. A., & Cunningham, J. W. (2006). Balanced reading intervention and assessment in augmentative communication. In R. J. McCauley & M. E. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 309–345). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  • Fallon, K. A., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Drager, K., & Hammer, C. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1424–1439. doi: 10.1044/1092–4388(2004/106).
  • Foley, B. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 156–173. doi: 10.1080/07434619912331278695.
  • Gillam, S. L., Fargo, J., Foley, B., & Olszewski, A. (2011). A nonverbal phoneme deletion task administered in a dynamic assessment format. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.11.003.
  • Google. (2010). About google scholar. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html.
  • Hanser, G. A., & Erickson, K. A. (2007). Integrated word identification and communication instruction for students with complex communication needs. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 268–278. doi: 10.1177/10883576070220040901.
  • Hart, P., Scherz, J., Apel, K., & Hodson, B. (2007). Analysis of spelling error patterns of individuals with complex communication needs and physical impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 16–29. doi: 10.1080/07434610600802737.
  • Heller, K. W., Fredrick, L. D., & Diggs, C. A. (1999). Teaching reading to students with severe speech and physical impairments using the nonverbal reading approach. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 18, 3–34.
  • Heller, K. W., Fredrick, L. D., Tumlin, J., & Brineman, D. G. (2002). Teaching decoding for generalization using the nonverbal reading approach. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 19–35. doi: 10.1023/a:1013559612238.
  • Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Hetzroni, O. E. (2004). AAC and literacy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1305–1312.
  • Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
  • Iacono, T. A., & Cupples, L. (2002). Assessment of phonological awareness and reading, Version 1.15. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://elr.com.au/apar/
  • Iacono, T. A., & Cupples, L. (2004). Assessment of phonemic awareness and word reading skills of people with complex communication needs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 437–449. doi: 10.1044/1092–4388(2004/035).
  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2012). About us. Retrieved February 22, 2012, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/aboutus/
  • Johnston, S. S., Davenport, L., Kanarowski, B., Rhodehouse, S., & McDonnell, A. P. (2009). Teaching sound letter correspondence and consonant-vowel-consonant combinations to young children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 123–135. doi: 10.1080/07434610902921409.
  • Koppenhaver, D. A., & Yoder, D. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe physical and speech impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ros (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 2, pp. 156–201). New York: Teachers College.
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
  • Larsen, S. C., Hammill, D. D., & Moats, L. (1999). Test of written spelling (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2009). Accessible literacy learning: Evidence-based reading instruction for learners with autism, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and other disabilities. San Diego, CA: Mayer Johnson.
  • Light, J., McNaughton, D., Weyer, M., & Karg, L. (2008). Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A case study of a student with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 120–132. doi: 10.1055/s-2008–1079126.
  • Lovett, M. W., Borden, S. L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805–822. doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.30.6.805.
  • Machalicek, W., Sanford, A., Lang, R., Rispoli, M., Molfenter, N., & Mbeseha, M. (2010). Literacy interventions for students with physical and developmental disabilities who use aided AAC devices: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 219–240. doi: 10.1007/s10882-009-9175-3.
  • MacWhinney, B. (1996). The CHILDES system. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 5–14.
  • Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & McNaughton, D. B. (2004). The effect of direct instruction and writer’s workshop on the early writing skills of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 164–178. doi: 10.1080/07434610410001699690.
  • Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., & Shapiro, M. B. (2010). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. [Electronic]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1–29. doi: 10.1177/00222194093554722010.
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Notari-Syverson, A., O’Connor, R. E., & Vadasy, P. F. (1998). Ladders to literacy: A preschool activity book. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  • O’Toole, T., Logemann, J. A., & Baum, H. M. (1998). Conducting clinical trials in the public schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 257–262.
  • Shadish, W. R., Rindskopf, D. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2008). The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment & Intervention, 2, 188–196. doi: 10.1080/17489530802581603.
  • Snell, M. E., Brady, N. C., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi: 10.1352/1944–7558-115-5.364.
  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Truxler, J. E., & O’Keefe, B. M. (2007). The effects of phonological awareness instruction on beginning word recognition and spelling. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 23, 164–176. doi: 10.1080/07434610601151803.
  • Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. (1999). Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 191–211. doi: 10.1080/07434619912331278725.
  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.101.2.192.
  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.30.1.73.
  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
  • Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16, 5–20. doi: 10.1023/A:1021789804977.
  • Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.