References
- Angelo, D. H. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47.
- Angelo, D. H., Jones, S. D., & Kokoska, S. M. (1995). Family perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–202.
- Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60.
- Dijkers, M., Kropp, G., Esper, R., Yavuzer, G., Cullen, N., & Bakdalieh, Y. (2002). Reporting on reliability and validity of outcome measures in medical rehabilitation research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 819–827.
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Toronto: Wiley & Sons.
- Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Scherer, M. J., & DeRuyter, F. (2003). A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25, 1243–1251.
- Henderson, S., Skelton, H., & Rosenbaum, P. (2008). Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: Impact on child and caregiver function. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50(2), 89–98.
- Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.
- Lenker, J. A., Scherer, M. J., Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., & DeRuyter, F. (2005). Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assistive Technology, 17, 7–22.
- McDougall, J., Wright, V., & Rosenbaum, P. (2010). The ICF model of functioning and disability: Incorporating quality of life and human development. Neurorehabilitation, 13, 204–211.
- Ryan, S. E., Campbell, K. A., & Rigby, P. (2007). Reliability of the Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for families of young children with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 88, 1436–1440.
- Ryan, S. E., Campbell, K. A., Rigby, P., Fishbein-Germon, B., Hubley, D., & Chan, B. (2009). The impact of adaptive seating devices on children with cerebral palsy and their families. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 90, 27–33.
- Ryan, S. E., Campbell, K. A., Rigby, P., Germon, B., Chan, B., & Hubley, D. (2006). Development of the New Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale (FIATS). International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 195–200.
- Scherer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Fuhrer, M. J., Demers, L., Deruyter, F. (2007). A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2, 1–8.
- Shepherd, T., Campbell, K., Renzoni, A., & Sloan, N. (2009). Reliability of speech generating devices: A 5 year review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 145–153.
- Spiliotopoulou, G. (2009). Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach’s alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56, 150–155.
- Stein, R. E. K., & Jessop, D. J. (2003). The impact on family scale revisited: Further psychometric data. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 24, 9–16.
- Streiner, D., & Norman, G. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
- World Health Organization (2002). Toward a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF. Retrieved July 28, 2011 from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
- World Health Organization. (2007). ICF-CY, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & youth version. Geneva: World Health Organization.