Gearing up to a New Activity: How Teachers use Object Adjustments 
to Manage the Attention of Children with Autism

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). Joint-attention deficits in autism: Towards a cognitive analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J. (2008). Displaying orientation in the classroom: Students’ multimodal responses to teacher instructions. Linguistics and Education, 19, 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4, Serial No. 255).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1997). The meaning of things. Social Analysis, 41, 76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A. N., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., & Brown, E. (1998). Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occurring social stimuli. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 479–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, G., Toth, K., Abbott, R., Osterling, J., Munson, J., Estes, A., & Liaw, J. (2004). Early social attention impairments in autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40, 271–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: How children with autistic spectrum disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress. Gesture, 7, 271–303.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F., & Frith U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study 
of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1990). Spatial organization in social encounters: The F-formation system. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. (pp. 209–238). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2005). Gaze as social control: How very young 
children differentiate “the look” from a “mere look” by their adult caregivers. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38, 417–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M., & Zimmerman, D. (2007). Joint attention in action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 592–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klin, A., Jones. W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkiakangas, T., Rae, J., & Dickerson, P. (2012). The interactional work of repeated talk between a teacher and a child with autism. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?” A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 521–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, R., & Bryson, S. E. (2004). Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1115–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leekam, S. R., Lopez, B., & Moore, C. (2000). Attention and joint attention in preschool children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 36, 261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leekam, S. R., & Moore, C. (2001). The development of attention and joint attention in children with autism. In J. A. Burack, 
T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research. (pp. 105–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G.H., Zimmerman, D.H., & Kidwell, M. (2011). Formal structures of practical tasks: A resource for action in the social life of very young children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & 
C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 44–58). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, D. R. (2011). Impaired visual disengagement in autism: Can this be due to stimulus effects and inherent interest? (Doctoral thesis, Durham University). Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1392
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, B. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesibov, G., Shea, V. & Schopler, E. (2005). TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. Raleigh, NC: Autism Society of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 542–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1990). A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 115–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society, 14, 727–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, J. P. (2001). Organizing participation in interaction: Doing participation framework. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis 1. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse in the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disability, 31, 344–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (1995). On projection. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expression and implication of the social bias in human intelligence. (pp. 87–110). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8, 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2009). Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46, 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (2009). Projection and anticipation: The forward-looking nature of embodied communication. Discourse Processes, 46, 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stribling, P., & Rae, J. (2010). Interactional analysis of scaffolding in a mathematical task in ASD. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis. (pp. 185–208). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. & Basil, C (2011). Terminology and notation 
in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Introduction. In S. 
von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. (pp. 1–18). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H. R. (Ed.) (1999). Alfred Schutz on phenomenology and social relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E., Kendell-Scott, L., & Costall, A. (2005). Parents’ experiences of introducing everyday object use to their children with autism. Autism, 9, 495–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (1993). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar