Simultaneous Natural Speech and AAC Interventions for Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Lessons from a Speech-Language Pathologist Focus Group

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007a). Childhood apraxia of speech [Position Statement]. Retrieved on 1st August, 2012. Available from: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007b). Childhood apraxia of speech [Technical Report]. Retrieved on 1st August, 2012. Available from: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Compendium of EBP guidelines and systematic reviews. Retrieved on 3rd May, 2013 from: http://www.asha.org/members/ebp/compendium/
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Evidence-based practice. Retrieved on 3rd May, 2013 from: http://www.asha.org/members/ebp/
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2010). Focus groups. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. de Vries, (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 327–352). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L. J., & Fager, S. (2008). An AAC personnel framework: Adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 255–267. doi:10.1080/07434610802388477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C. (2007). Aided AAC intervention for children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 10–12. doi:10.1044/aac16.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W. (1989). Augmentative communication services in the schools. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 31, 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286. doi:10.3109/07434610903384529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumley, G. D., & Swanson, S. (1999). Augmentative and alternative communication options for children with developmental apraxia of speech: Three case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 110–125. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278615
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. J. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication and language: Understanding and responding to parents’ perspectives. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 51–61. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200401000-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. T., Baker, B. R., Klotz, L. S., & Badman, A. L. (1997). Static and dynamic keyboards: Semantic compaction in both worlds. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference, 9–17. Birmingham, AL: SEAC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Mathisen, B., & Balandin, S. (2014). Speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of implementing communication intervention with students with multiple and severe disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 55–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, A. L., & Kent, R. D. (2004, November). Developmental profiles of children diagnosed with apraxia of speech. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Quach, W., Lund, S., & McKelvey, M. (2012). AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 148–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. K. (2000a). A letter to the parent(s) of a child with developmental apraxia of speech, part I: Speech characteristics of the disorder. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 169–172. Retrieved from: http://lshss.pubs.asha.org/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. K. (2000b). A letter to the parent(s) of a child with developmental apraxia of speech, part IV: Treatment of DAS. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 179–181. Retrieved from: http://lshss.asha.org/cgi/reprint/31/2/179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., Keppner, K., Schanz, A., & Berg, A. (2008). Augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children: Intervention goals and use of technology. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 83–91. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1080754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., Morehouse, T. B., & Gutmann, M. (2002). AAC strategies for enhancing the usefulness of natural speech in children with severe intelligibly challenges. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, & J. C. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 433–452). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cameron, M. (2009). Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 236–249. doi: 10.3109/07434610903322151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–124. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112043
   Google Scholar
• King, A. M., Hengst, J. A., & DeThorne, L. S. (2013). Severe speech sound disorders: An integrated multimodal intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 195–210. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0023)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.ohiou.edu/stable/2529310?seq = 7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (2003). Shattering the silence: Development of communicative competence by individuals who use AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 3–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216. doi:10.1080/07434610701553635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. B. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: Successful full-time employment experience of individuals with cerebral palsy who used augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 59–76. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281171
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). “Don't give up”: Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195. doi:10.1080/aac.17.3.179.195
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M. B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. T., & Vogel, A. P. (2008). Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1–19. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, E., McCabe, P., & Ballard, B. J. (2014). A systematic review of treatment outcomes for children with childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 486–504. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelock, P.A., Beatson, J., Bitner, B., Broder, C., & Ducker, A. (2003). Interdisciplinary assessment of young children with autism spectrum disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Aram, D. M., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1997). Developmental apraxia of speech: I. Descriptive and theoretical perspectives. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 273–285. Retrieved from: http://jslhr.asha.org/cgi/reprint/40/2/273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt. P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tates, K., Zwaanswijk, M., Otten, R., van Dulmen, S., Hoogerbrugge, P. M., Kamps, W. A., & Bensing. J. (2009). Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: Examples from pediatric oncology. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 15. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Weissling, K., & Prentice, C. (2010). The timing of remediation and compensation rehabilitation programs for individuals with acquired brain injuries: Opening the conversation. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, C., Dexter, M., & Moore, J. (1997). AAC and children with developmental disabilities. In S. L. Glennen, & D. C. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 395–432). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Robson, K. (2004). Reengineering focus group methodology for the online environment. In M. Johns, S. L. Chen & G. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics (pp. 25–45). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Yoss, K. A., & Darley, F. L. (1974). Therapy in developmental apraxia of speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 5, 23–31. Retrieved from: http://lshss.asha.org/
   Google Scholar