Noun Representation in AAC Grid Displays: Visual Attention Patterns of People with Traumatic Brain Injury

References

• Beck, A. R., & Fritz, H. (1998). Can people who have aphasia learn iconic codes? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 184–196.
   Google Scholar
• Beharelle, A. R., Tisserand, D., Stuss, D. T., McIntosh, A. R., & Levine, B. (2011). Brain activity patterns uniquely supporting visual feature integration after traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, A., Rasavage, K., & Politzer, T. (2010). Practical clinical treatment strategies for evaluation and treatment of visual field loss and visual inattention. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.) Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, M., Watson, M., Walshe, C., & Maj, F. (2009). Extremely selective attention: Eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1196–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A., Hux, K., Kenny, C., & Funk, T. (2014). Consistency and idiosyncrasy of semantic categorization by individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Advance online publication. Posted online on May 20, 2014. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.921250
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilo, M., Politzer, T., Ripley, D., & Weintraub, A. (2010). Vision examination of TBI patients in an acute rehabilitation hospital. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda, K. J., & Ludlam, D. P. (2011). Conceptual model of optometric vision care in mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 22, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., & Beukelman, D. R. (2006). Visual scene displays (VSD): New AAC interfaces for persons with aphasia. Perspectives in AAC, 15, 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., Light, J. C., Speltz, J. C., Fallon, K. A., & Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 1/2 year olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., & Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Hux, K., Beukelman, D., & Karantounis, R. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuny, L. A., Briggs, M., Newcombe, F., Ratcliff, G., & Thomas, C. (1980). Measuring the duration of post traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 43, 377–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Doyle, M. (1992). Language representation for the augmentative and alternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7, 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene's test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Statistical Science, 24, 343–360.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, B., Kapoor, N., & Singh, A. (2012). Visual impairments in the first year after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26, 1338–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, W. (1981). Statistics: Third edition. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 243–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornof, A. J., & Halverson, T. (2002). Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 592–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulse, P., & Dudley, L. (2010). Visual perceptual deficiencies in the brain injury population: Management from start to finish. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Beukelman, D., Dombrovskis, M., Snyder, R. (1993). Semantic organization following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Jagaroo, V. (2002). Dynamic computational visual field matrices: A computerized mapping system for the analysis of visual perception, spatial processing, and featural recognition. In C. H. Dagli, A. L. Buczak, J. Gosh, M. J. Embrechts, O. Ersory, & S. W. Kercel (Eds.), Smart engineering system design, neural networks and fuzzy logic .(Vol. 12, pp. 81–90). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., Ylvisaker, M., Sohlberg, M., Yorkston, K., & Kan, P. (2008). Interventions for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 257–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kozleski, E. (1991). Visual symbol acquisition by students with autism. Exceptionality, 2, 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). From basic to applied research to improve outcomes for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: Potential contributions of eye tracking research methods. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias, J. L., & Wheaton, P. (2007). Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology, 21, 212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, M. J., Carpenter, S., & Moran, C. (2010). Speech intelligibility and perceptions of communication effectiveness by speakers with dysarthria following traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Brain Injury, 24, 1408–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., Hux, K., Dietz, A., & Beukelman, D. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on comprehension by people with chronic aphasia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 19, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politzer, T., & Lenahan, D. (2010). Double vision caused by neurologic disease and injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, 1, 211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, D., & Politzer, T. (2010). Vision disturbance after TBI. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 215–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, D. L., Politzer, T., Berryman, A., Rasavage, K., & Weintraub, A. (2010). The vision clinic: An interdisciplinary method for assessment and treatment of visual problems after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 231–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). Oops!: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 5–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, R (1995). Iconicity in language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C., & Hux, K. (2000). Traumatic brain injury survivors’ ability to reduce idiosyncrasy in semantic organization. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 187–197.
   Google Scholar
• Theodoros, D. G., Murdoch, B. E., & Chenery, H. J. (1994). Perceptual speech characteristics of dysarthric speakers following severe closed head injury. Brain Injury, 8, 101–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., Ullman, C., & Longenecker, M. (2014). Measurement of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia: A preliminary investigation of two types of human engagement in photographic images. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. (2010). AAC use by people with TBI: Affects of cognitive impairments. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E., Hux, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Navigation of a dynamic screen AAC interface by survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 242–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. T., Kent, R. D., Duffy, J. R., & Thomas, J. E. (2005). Dysarthria associated with traumatic brain injury: Speaking rate and emphatic stress. Journal of communication disorders, 38, 231–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M. & Light, J. (2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54, 1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 15, 419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar