Building Evidence-based Practice in AAC Display Design for Young Children: Current Practices and Future Directions

References

• Adamson, L. B., Romski, M. A., Deffebach, K., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992). Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: Augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 35, 1333–1343. doi:10.1044/jshr.3506.1333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2007). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy/SP2007-00283/
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2014). 2014 Schools survey report: SLP caseload characteristics. Retrieved from www.asha.org/research/memberdata/schoolsurvey/
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278894
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L., Marvin, C., Beukelman, D., Lasker, J., & Rupp, D. (1999). Generic talk use by preschool children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 145–155. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278685
   Google Scholar
• Banajee, M., Dicarlo, C., & Stricklin, S. B. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 67–73. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112034
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275633
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Jones, R., & Rowan, M. (1989). Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 243–248. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275296
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275883
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiero, J. M. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication, behavior, and academic program of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 179–189. doi:10.1177/108835760101600306
   Google Scholar
• Cafiero, J. M., & Delsack, B. S. (2007). AAC and autism: Compelling issues, promising practices and future directions. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 23–26. doi:10.1044/aac16.2.23
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology, 22, 200–212. doi:10.1080/10400435.2010.492774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2011). Functional seating for school-age children with cerebral palsy: An evidence-based tutorial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 223–236. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2010/10-0001)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Quach, W., Lund, S. K., & McKelvey, M. (2012). AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 148–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Carlson, R., D’Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/084)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Speltz, J. C., Fallon, K. A., & Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 -year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/024)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K. A., Light, J. C., & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semantic organization patterns of young children: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 74–85. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112061
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, P. (2006). Engaging families as experts: Collaborative family program development. Family Process, 45, 237–257. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00093.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. & Lloyd, L. (1991). Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 215–220. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275913
   Google Scholar
• Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Rieger, J. (2000). Sensory and cognitive contributions of color to the recognition of natural scenes. Current Biology, 10, 805–808. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens’, C., Crain, S. S., & Elder, P. S. (1999). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive symbolic communication: 18 months to 5 years developmentally (4th ed.). Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, E., Yorkston, K. M., & Britton, D. (2011). Dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review of speech characteristics, speech treatment and AAC options. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 12–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O. E., & Ne'eman, A. (2013). Influence of colour on acquisition and generalisation of graphic symbols. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 669–680. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01584.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Müller, E., & Goetz, L. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–35. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.20.35
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99. doi:10.1080/07434610500483588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., McDonnell, A. P., Nelson, C., & Magnavito, A. (2003). Teaching functional communication skills using augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 263–280. doi:10.1177/105381510302500403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. D., Angelo, D. H., & Kokoska, S. M. (1999). Stressors and family supports: Families with children using augmentative & alternative communication technology. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 20, 37–44. doi:10.1177/152574019902000205
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Binger, C. (2009). Addressing the communication demands of the classroom for beginning communicators and early language users. In G. Soto & C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy, and academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 143–172). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., & Erickson, K. A. (2003). Natural emergent literacy supports for preschoolers with autism and severe communication impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 283–292. doi:10.1097/00011363-200310000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R., & Lloyd, L. (1994). Survey of professional preparation in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in speech-language pathology and special education programs. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 13–22. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0303.13
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, T. M., & Kenyon, P. B. (2003). Visual issues and access to AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 277–319). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2005, November). Maximizing language development with young children who require AAC. Presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association annual convention, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216. doi:10.1080/07434610701553635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K. D., & Nemser, J. G. (2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 137–149. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699735
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275893
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013a). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.848935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013b). Literacy intervention for individuals with complex communication needs. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed., pp. 309–351). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Pub Co.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Pitkin, L. (2007). Children's ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 274–287. doi:10.1080/07434610701390475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, L. A., Montano, J. J., Fusco, L. M., & Gould, E. P. (2003). Speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of their training and experience in using alternative and augmentative communication. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 30, 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The picture communication symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• McFadd, E., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in the design of aided visual displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 136–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Reichle, J. (1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 627–633. doi:10.1044/jshd.5404.627
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy, J., Markova, I., Collins, S., & Moodie, E. (1996). AAC systems: Obstacles to effective use. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 31, 31–44. doi:10.3109/13682829609033150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogletree, B. T. (2012). Stakeholders as partners: Making AAC work better. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 151–158. doi:10.1044/aac21.4.151
   Google Scholar
• Olin, A. R., Reichle, J., Johnson, L., & Monn, E. (2010). Examining dynamic visual scene displays: Implications for arranging and teaching symbol selection. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 284–297. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0001)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, A., Koul, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (2008). Preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: An update for speech-language pathology training. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 48–59. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (2003). Augmented input. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 147–162). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Psychological foundations. In D. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Human motor control (2nd ed., pp. 93–134). Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281201
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C. (2006). Using visual scene displays to improve communication and communication instruction in persons with autism spectrum disorders. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 8–13. doi:10.1044/aac15.1.8
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … & Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart, S., & Ritthaler, C. (2008). Case studies of intermediate steps between AAC evaluations and implementation. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 150–155. doi:10.1044/aac17.4.150
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D. E., Gillon, G. G., & Yoder, D. E. (2005). AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 295–307. doi:10.1080/07434610500103483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Center for AAC and Autism. (2009). What is LAMP? Retrieved from http://www.aacandautism.com/lamp
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. (2009). The effects of color cues on typically developing preschoolers’ speed of locating a target line drawing: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication display design. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 231–240. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0029)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M, Carlin, M., & Jagaroo, V. (2006). Preschoolers’ speed of locating a target symbol under different color conditions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 123–133. doi:10.1080/07434610500483620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Carlin, M., & Thistle, J. (2008). The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 179–193. doi:10.1044/1058-3060(2008/018)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 54, 1644–1657. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0098)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Snell, J. (2011). Facilitating children's ability to distinguish symbols for emotions: The effects of background color cues and spatial arrangement of symbols on accuracy and speed of search. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 288–301. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0065)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., O’Neill, T., & McIlvane, W. J. (2013). Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-aged children without disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 455–466. doi:10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0159
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206. doi:10.1080/08990220802387851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormnæs, S., & Abdel Malek, Y. (2004). Egyptian speech therapists want more knowledge about augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 30–41. doi:10.1080/07434610310001629571
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899–911. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. (2002). Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 458–468. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Honsinger, M., Dowden, P., & Marriner, N. (1989). Vocabulary selection: A case report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 101–108. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275076
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59. doi:10.1080/07434619412331276740
   Google Scholar