30,771
Views
103
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Designing AAC Research and Intervention to Improve Outcomes for Individuals with Complex Communication Needs

&
Pages 85-96 | Received 29 Mar 2015, Accepted 29 Mar 2015, Published online: 22 Apr 2015

References

  • Austin, P. (2014). Beautiful eyes: A father transformed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
  • Ball, L., Beukelman, D., & Bardach, L. (2007). AAC intervention for ALS. In D. Beukelman, K. Garrett, & K. Yorkston (Eds.), Augmentative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions (pp. 287–316). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Beukelman, D., Fager, S., & Nordness, A. (2011). Communication support for people with ALS. Neurology Research International, Article ID 714693, 1–6. doi: 10.1155/2011/714693.
  • Beukelman, D., Hux, K., Dietz, A., McKelvey, M. & Weissling, K. (in press). Using visual scene displays as communication support options for people with chronic, severe aphasia: A summary of AAC research and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Birmingham, J., & Light, J. (2014, November). School team perspectives in augmentative and alternative communication assessment. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, Orlando, FL.
  • Blackstone, S., Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (2015). Patient-provider communication roles for speech-language pathologists and other health care professionals. San Diego, CA: Plural.
  • Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286. doi: 10.3109/07434610903384529
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bryen, D. N., Carey, A., & Frantz, B. (2003). Ending the silence: Adults who use augmentative communication and their experiences as victims of crimes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 19, 125–134. doi:10.1080/0743461031000080265
  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032006003
  • Collier, B., McGhie-Richmond, D., Odette, F., & Pyne, J. (2006). Reducing the risk of sexual abuse for people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 62–75. doi:10.1080/07434610500387490
  • Collier, B., McGhie-Richmond, D., & Self, H. (2010). Exploring communication assistants as an option for increasing communication access to communities for people who use augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 48–59. doi: 10.3109/07434610903561498
  • Dattilo, J., Estrella, G., Estrella, L., Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Seabury, M. (2008). “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure and community recreation by individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 16–28. doi:10.1080/07434610701390558
  • De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Foreman, P., Balandin, S., & Mathisen, B. (2011). Complex contextual influences on the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 422–435. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.550691
  • Finke, E., McNaughton, D., & Drager, K. (2009). “All children can and should have the opportunity to learn”: General education teachers’ perspectives on including children with autism spectrum disorder who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 110–122. doi:10.1080/07434610902886206
  • Foley, B. E., & Wolter, J. (2010). Literacy intervention for transition-aged youth: What is and what could be. In D. McNaughton, & D. Beukelman, (Eds.), Transition strategies for adolescents and young adults who use AAC (pp. 35–68). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R., & Hux, K. (2012). Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assistive Technology, 24, 56–66. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2011.648713
  • Fried-Oken, M., Fox, L., Rau, M. T., Tullman, J., Baker, G., Hindal, M., .. & Lou, J. S. (2006). Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 209–221. doi:10.1080/07434610600650276
  • Fried-Oken, M., & Granlund, M. (2012). AAC and ICF: A good fit to emphasize outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 1–2. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.652782
  • Ganz, J. B. (in press).AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication
  • Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Mason, R. A., Rispoli, M. J., Heath, A. K., & Parker, R. I. (2011). An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1500–1509. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.011
  • Granlund, M., Björck-Åkesson, E., Wilder, J., & Ylvén, R. (2008). AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 207–219. doi:10.1080/08990220802387935
  • Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Family practice, 25(Suppl. 1):, i20–i24. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn055
  • Hamm, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 134–147. doi:10.1080/07434610500395493
  • Hanson, E. K., Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (2013). Communication support through multimodal supplementation: A scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 310–321. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.848934
  • Hemsley, B., & Balandin, S. (2014). A meta-synthesis of patient-provider communication in hospitals for patients with severe communication disabilities: Informing new translational research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 329–343. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.955614
  • Holland, A. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.50
  • Howlin, P., Magiati, I., Charman, T., & MacLean, W.E. (2009)Systematic review of early intensive behavioral inter ventions for children with autism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 23–41. doi: 10.1352/2009.114:23-41
  • Hunt-Berg, M. (2005). The Bridge School: Educational inclusion outcomes over 15 years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 116–131. doi:10.1080/07434610500103509
  • Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (2009). Maximizing community inclusion through mainstream communication services for adults with severe disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 180–190. doi:10.1080/17549500902825265
  • Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K., Malani, M., & Binger, C. (in press). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • Larsson, I., & Thorén-Jönsson, A. L. (2007). The Swedish speech interpretation service: An exploratory study of a new communication support provided to people with aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 312–322. doi:10.1080/07434610601180026
  • Lasker, J. P., & Bedrosian, J. L. (2000). Acceptance of AAC by adults with acquired disorders. In D.R. Beukelman, K .M. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders (pp.107–136). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Law, M., & Dunn, W. (1994). Perspectives on understanding and changing the environments of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(3), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/J006v13n03_01
  • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions for research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274657
  • Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275126
  • Light, J. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277848
  • Light, J. (2003). Shattering the silence: Development of comm unicative competence by individuals who use AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 3–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of comm unication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
  • Light, J., McNaughton, D., Krezman, C., Williams, M. B., Gulens, M., Galskoy, A., & Umpleby, M. (2007). The AAC Mentor Project: Web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 56–75. doi:10.1080/07434610600924499
  • Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2005). The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: The evaluation of a peer-training program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 278–294. doi:10.1080/07434610500103467
  • Lund, S., & Light, J. (2006). Long term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part I – What is a “good” outcome? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 284–299. doi:10.1080/07434610600718693
  • Lund, S., & Light, J. (2007a). Long term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – Communicative interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 1–15. doi:10.1080/07434610600720442
  • Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007b). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III – Contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335. doi:10.1080/02656730701189123
  • Mawn, B. E., & Goldberg, S. (2012). Trends in the nursing doctoral comprehensive examination process: A national survey. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28, 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.013
  • McCarthy, J. W., Donofrio-Horwitz, L. M., & Smucker, L. M. (2010). The effects of reading personal narratives written by an individual who uses AAC on the attitudes of pre-professionals in business. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 61–74. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481562
  • McCarthy, J., & Light, J. (2005). Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 41–55. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699753
  • McCarthy, J., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2007). The effects of internet-based instruction on the social problem solving of young adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 100–112. doi:10.1080/07434610600720426
  • McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N. (2002). Enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assistive Technology, 14, 58–70. doi:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055
  • McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N. (2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 217–229. doi:10.1080/07434610701573856
  • McNaughton, D., & Kennedy, P. (2010). Key components of successful transitions. In D. McNaughton & D. Beukelman (Eds.), Transition strategies for adolescents and young adults who use AAC (pp.3–15). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: The full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 59–76. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281171
  • McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). “Don't give up”: The employment experiences of individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195. doi:10.1080/aac.17.3.179.195
  • Mirenda, P. (2014). Revisiting the mosaic of supports required for including people with severe intellectual or developmental disabilities in their communities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 19–27. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.875590
  • Mirenda, P., & Bopp, K. (2003). “Playing the game”: Strategic competence in AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 401–440). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2013). Percentage distribution of students 6 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by educational environment and type of disability: Selected years, fall 1989 through fall 2011. United States Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_204.60.asp
  • Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M.F., & Green, V.A. (2015). Microswitch technology for enabling self-determined responding in children with profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1024888
  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
  • Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Barton-Hulsey, A. & Whitmore, A. (in press). Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years make? Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • Rummel-Hudson, R. (2008). Schuyler's monster: A father's journey with his wordless daughter. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Schlosser, R. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 234–247. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278775
  • Schlosser, R. (in press).Speech generating devices in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • Schlosser, R., & Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 208–226. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279074
  • Simeonsson, R., Björck-Åkesson, E., & Lollar, D. (2012). Communication, disability, and the ICF-CY. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 3–10. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653829
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., King, J. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (2013). Supporting communication for adults with acute and chronic aphasia. Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press.
  • Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008
  • Smith, M. (in press).Language development of individuals who require aided AAC: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • Smith-Lewis, M. (1994). Discontinuity in the development of aided augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 14–26. doi:10.1080/07434619412331276730
  • Snell, M. E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … & Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364
  • Solomon, A. (2012). Far from the tree: Parents, children, and the search for identity. New York: Scribner.
  • Stancliffe, R. J., Larson, S., Auerbach, K., Engler, J., Taub, S., & Lakin, K. C. (2010). Individuals with intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 87–96. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481564
  • Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Togher, L. (2010). “Communication is everything:” The experiences of volunteers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 75–86. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481561
  • Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.546810
  • van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1422–1431. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.003
  • Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Online Submission at http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/record Detail?accno = ED494935
  • Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–131. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.785020
  • World Health Organization (2013). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
  • Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1999). Staging Interventions in Progressive Dysarthria. SIG 2 Perspectives on Neuro physiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 9(4), 7–12.
  • Zeitlin, V. M., & Curcic, S. (2014). Parental voices on Individualized Education Programs: ‘Oh, IEP meeting tomorrow? Rum tonight! ’Disability & Society, 29, 373–387. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776493

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.