A Comparison of PECS and iPad to Teach Requesting to Pre-schoolers with Autistic Spectrum Disorders

References

• Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D.M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., Sutherland, D., … Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an iPod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.K., Lord, C., Risi, S., DiLavore, P.S., Shulman, C., Thurm, A., … Pickles, A. (2007). Patterns of growth in verbal abilities among children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 594–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A.R., Stoner, J.B., Bock, S.J., & Parton, T. (2008). Comparison of PECS and the use of a VOCA: A replication. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 198–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, M.C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 480–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. (2013). The use of augmentative and alternative communication apps for the iPad, iPod and iPhone: An overview of recent developments. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 18(1), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, D.L., & Seung, H. (2009). Evaluation of the efficacy of communication-based treatments for autism spectrum disorders: A literature review. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31, 15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy, M.H., Carpenter, M., Loc, L., LeBlanc, L.A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social‐communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., & Hill, D. (2012). A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). Picture Exchange Communication System training manual (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: Pyramid Education Products, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J.B., Earles-Vollrath, T.L., Heath, A.K., Parker, R.I., Rispoli, M.J., & Duran, J.B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, J.B., Simpson, R.L., & Corbin-Newsome, J. (2008). The impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, J., Costello, J., & Shane, H. (2011). Using a clinical approach to answer “what communication apps should we use?” Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D.M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., Davis, T.N., … Sutherland, D. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, J., & Madislover, M. (1982). Derbyshire Language Scheme, Derbyshire County Council.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorah, E.R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula. D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 25, 637–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Hogrefe Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light. J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RERC on Communication Enhancement. (2011, March 14). Mobile devices & communication apps: An AAC-RERC white paper. Retrieved from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York-Barr, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, T.M., & Wacker, D.P. (1988). Parents’ ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 1, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2003a). Single-subject experimental designs. In R. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 88–146). San Diego. CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2003b). Determining the treatment integrity of AAC interventions. In R. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 182–202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., & Reichle, J. (1992). Comparing explicit to generalized requesting in an augmentative communication mode. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 4, 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Ahlsén, E. (2009). Speech-generating devices used at home by children with autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary assessment. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012a). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence™ – Third edition (WPPSI-III) Sydney, NSW: Pearson.
   Google Scholar