Operational Demands of AAC Mobile Technology Applications on Programming Vocabulary and Engagement During Professional and Child Interactions

References

• Blackstone, S., Light, J., Beukelman, D., & Shane, H. (2005). What are visual scene displays. Augmentative Communication News, 16, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J. (2015) “We bought an iPad”: Considering family priorities, needs, and preferences as an AAC support provider. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J., Light, J., Breakstone, B., & Drager, K. (2015). Comparison of the effects of mobile technology AAC apps on programming VSDs. Manuscript submitted instead of in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J., Costello, J., & Shane, H. (2014). Mobile devices and app selection: Who’s driving the decision process? Mini-seminar presented at the 2014 biannual meeting of the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C.J., & Marvin, C.A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S.N., Light, J.C., & McNaughton, D.B. (2013). Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of young children with complex communication needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield, C.E., Drager, K., Caron, J., & Light, J.C. (2015). Involvement in AAC programming: A descriptive study of toddlers with typical development. Manuscript submitted instead of in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K., Malani, M., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Let’s go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference? The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., & Currall, J. (2012). Effects of AAC systems with “just in time” programming for children with complex communication needs. Seminar presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. Drager, K., Currall, J., Brown, C., Dooris, M., Pecile, G., Therrien, M. (2015). Effects of mobile technologies and AAC apps with “just in time” programming on the communication of young children with complex communication needs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Pitkin, L. (2007). Children’s ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., Grodzicki, L., Jones, J., Parkin, E. (2006). Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: The performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 269–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J.H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Meder, A., & Wegner, J. (2015). iPads, mobile technologies, and computer applications: A survey of family wants, needs and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labeling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numeroff, L. (1997). If you give a mouse a cookie. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Shane, H.C., Allen, A.A., Abramson, J., Laubscher, E., & Dimery, K. (2015). Just-in-time supports in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10882-015-9452-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M., & Grove, N.C. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC. From research to effective practice (pp. 163–195). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C.E. (1999). Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 257–276). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.) Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K.M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P.J., & Warren, S.F. (2002). Effects of prelinguistic milieu teaching and parent responsivity education on dyads involving children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1158–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar