References
- Myers MG. The great myth of office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1894–18.
- Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Chaveles IA, Mousoulis GP. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:661–666.
- Campbell NR, McKay DW, Conradson H. et al. Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima–medial thickness in male firefighters. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:588–590.
- 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1925–1938.
- Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:127–132.
- Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL Jr, et al. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:161–165.
- Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:18.
- Edwards C, Hiremath S, Gupta A, et al. BpTRUth: do automated blood pressure monitors outperform mercury? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013;7:448–453.
- Sheppard JP, Holder R, Nichols L, et al. Predicting out-of-office blood pressure level using repeated measurements in the clinic: an observational cohort study. J Hypertens. 2014;32:2171–2178.
- Saladini F, Benetti E, Malipiero G, et al. Does home blood pressure allow for a better assessment of the white-coat effect than ambulatory blood pressure? J Hypertens. 2012;30:2118–2124.
- Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14:108–111.
- Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–1530.
- Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286.
- Schillaci G, Pucci G, Pirro M, et al. Combined effects of office and 24-h blood pressure on aortic stiffness in human hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011;29:869–875.
- Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, et al. Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2009;54:226–232.
- Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, et al. Increased long-term risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in white-coat and masked hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27:1672–1678.
- Verdecchia P, Reboldi GP, Angeli F, et al. Short- and long-term incidence of stroke in white-coat hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;45:203–208.
- Mancia G, Bombelli M, Brambilla G, et al. Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: an insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements. Hypertension. 2013;62:168–174.
- SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–2116.
- Cushman WC, Whelton PK, Fine LJ, et al., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553234 SPRINT Trial Results: Latest News in Hypertension Management. Hypertension. 2016;67:263–265.
- Schiffrin EL, Calhoun DA, Flack JM. SPRINT proves that lower is better for nondiabetic high-risk patients, but at a price. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29:2–4.
- SPRINT Research Group. The design and rationale of a multi-center clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Clin Trials. 2014;11:532–546.