Scientific approaches to making psychodynamic formulations

References

• Popper K R. The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London 1959
   Google Scholar
• Bellak L, Hurvich M, Gediman H. Ego functions in schizophrenics, neurotics and normals. Wiley, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Bellak L, Goldsmith L A. The broad scope of ego function assessment. Willey, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant G E. Adaptation to life. Little Brown, Boston 1977
   Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Cooper S H. An empirical study of defense mechanisms. Arch Gen Psyciatry 1989; 46: 444–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz P FD. The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. Methods of research in psychotherapy, L Gottschalk, L Auerbach. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Malan D H. The frontier of brief psychotherapy. An example of the convergence of research and clinical practice. Plenum Press, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Malan D H. Individual psychotherapy and the science of psychodynamics. Butterworths, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• De Witt K N, Kaltreider N B, Weiss D S, Horowitz M J. Judging change in psychotherapy. Reliability of clinical formulations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40: 1121–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malan D H. Towards the validation of dynamic psychotherapy. Plenum, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Høglend P, SørbyeØ, Sørlie T, Fossum A. Selection criteria for brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psy-chother Psychosom 1991, In press
   Google Scholar
• Shrout P E, Fleiss J L. Intraclass correlations. Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1799; 86: 420–8
   Google Scholar
• Weiss J, Sampson H, Mt. Zion, Psychotherapy Research Group. The psychoanalytic process. Theory, clinical observation and empirical research. Guilford Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg S E, Stilberschatz G, Curtis J T, et al. A method for establishing reliability of statements from psychodynamic case formulations. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143: 1454–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins W D, Stanley B M. Extending the Plan Formulation Method to an object relations perspective. Reliability, stability and adaptability. Psychological assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 3: 75–81
   Google Scholar
• Silberschatz G, Fretter P B, Curtis J T. How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54: 646–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, Crits-Cristoph P. Understanding transference - The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) method. Basic Books, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. The dynamics of transference. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, J Stra-Chey. Hogarth Press, London 1988; Vol 12: 97–108
   Google Scholar
• Sandler J, Holder A, Kawenoku M, et al. Notes on some theoretical and clinical aspects of transference. Int J Psychoanal, 50: 633–45
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Cristoph P, Luborsky L, Dahl L, et al. Clinicians can agree in assessing relationship patterns in psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 1001–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement on partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, Crits-Cristoph P, Mellon J. The advent of objective measures of the transference concept. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54: 39–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, Mellon J, Alexander K, et al. A verification of Freuďs grandest clinical hypothesis: the transference. Clin Psychol Rev 1985; 5: 231–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crits-Cristoph P, Luborsky L. The CCRT as a measure of outcome in psychoanalytic psychotherapy. The scientific foundations of psychoanalysis, J Ghannam. Guilford, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Cristoph P, Cooper A, Luborsky L. Accuracy of therapists' interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Pschycol 1988; 56: 490–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Cooper S H. Psychodynamics, symptoms and bipolar II affective disorder. The borderline patient: current empirical research, T McGlashan. American Psychiatric Press. 1985
   Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Cooper S H. A preliminary report on defences and conflicts associated with borderline personality disorder. J Am Psychoanal Ass 1986; 34: 863–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Augusto F, Cooper S H. Assessing psychodynamic conflicts. I. Reliability of the Ideographic Conflict Formulation Method. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 289–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J C. Wishes and fears: a standard list and guidelines for assessing dynamic motives. The Cambridge Hospital, Boston 1989
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson E H. Identity, youth and crisis. Norton, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Perry J C. The Psychodynamic Conflict Rating Scales. The Cambridge Hospital, Boston 1988
   Google Scholar
• Schacht T, Binder J L, Strupp H H. The dynamic focus. Psychotherapy in a new key: a guide to time-limited dynamic psychotherapy, H H Strupp, J L Binder. Basic Books, New York 1984; 65–109
   Google Scholar
• Schacht T E, Henry W P. Modeling recurrent relationship patterns with structural analysis of social behaviour: the SASB-CMP. Handbook of psychodynamic treatment research, N Miller, J Docher-Ty, L Luborsky. Basic Books, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz M. Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991
   Google Scholar
• Grawe K, Caspar F. Die Plan Analyse als Konzept und Instrument für die Psychotherapieforschung. Psychotherapie: Makro -und Mikro Perspektiven, U Baumann. Hogrete, Cologne 1984
   Google Scholar
• Ryle A. The focus in brief interpretive psychotherapy: Dilemmas, traps and snags as target problems. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill M M, Hoffman J Z. A method for studying the analysis of aspects of the patient's experience of the relationship in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. J Am Psychoanal Ass 1982; 30: 137–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz L M, Rosenberg S E, Baer B A, et al. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56: 885–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss D S, De Witt K N, Kaltreider N B, et al. A proposed method for measuring change beyond symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 42: 703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinryb R M, Rössel R J. KAPP - Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991; 83, Suppl 363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Luborsky L, Silberschatz G, Popp C. An examination of three methods of psychodynamic formulation based on the same videotaped interview. Psychiatry 1989; 56: 302–23
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M E, Popp C, Schacht T E, et al. Converging evidence for identification of recurrent relationship themes: comparison of two methods. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 275–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz M J. Relationship schema formulation: role-relationship models and intra-psychic conflict. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 260–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar