Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters

References

• Hersh PS. A standardized classification of corneal topography after laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 1997;13:571–575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa N, Cennamo G, Sebastiani A. Classification of corneal topographic patterns after PRK. J Refract Surg 2000;16:481–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa N, Lanza M, De Rosa G, Romano A. Anterior corneal surface after Nidek EC-5000 multipass and multizone photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 2002;18:460–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, et al. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4410–4414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce D, Taylor D. Reichert ocular response analyzer measures corneal biomechanical properties and IOP provides new indicators for corneal specialties and glaucoma management. Depew, NY: Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, March 2006
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 2006;15:364–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure: Adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Current Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:115–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:990–992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337–5347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: Relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:114–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:257–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:616–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of −19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg 2008;24:941–945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco S, Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom 2009;92:469–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmeric V, Sahin A, Ozge G, Bayer A. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea 2010;29:641–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011;21:138–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Nguyen MT, Lee N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. Cornea 2011;30:516–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy A, Chung RS, Wu RY, et al. Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1253–1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plakitsi A, O'Donnell C, Miranda MA, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties measured with the Ocular Response Analyser in a myopic population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011;31:404–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu AY, Duan SF, Zhao YE, et al. Correlation between corneal biomechanical properties, applanation tonometry and direct intracameral tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:640–644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Miranda MA, O'Donnell C. Corneal biomechanical properties and their correlates with refractive error. Clin Exp Optom 2012;95:12–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, et al. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: The ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:553–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlett A, Ryan L, Serrano-Trespalacios P, Wolfinger R. Mixed models for assessing correlation in the presence of replication. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2003;53:442–450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med 1997;16:2349–2380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371–1375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1491–1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar