References
- Gedde SJ, Sffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:9–22
- Shields MB, Shields SE. Noncontact transscleral Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation: a long-term follow-up of 500 patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994;92:271–283
- Egbert PR, Fiadoyor S, Budenz DL, et al. Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation as a primary surgical treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:345–350
- Sood S, Beck AD. Cyclophotocoagulation versus sequential tube shunt as a secondary intervention following primary tube shunt failure in pediatric glaucoma. J AAPOS 2009;13:379–383
- Lima FE, Magacho L, Carvalho DM, et al. A prospective, comparative study between endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and the Ahmed drainage implant in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2004;13:233–237
- Yildirim N, Yalvac IS, Sahin A, et al. A comparative study between diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in neovascular glaucoma: a long-term follow-up. J Glaucoma 2009;18:192–196
- Chalam KV, Gandham S, Gupta S, et al. Pars plana modified Baerveldt implant versus neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002;33:383–393
- Min SH, Chung YS, Kim KH, et al. Neovascular glaucoma: diode laser trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation versus Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2005;17:1151–1157
- Eid TE, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, et al. Tube-shunt surgery versus neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmol 1997;104:1692–1700
- Malik R, Ellingham RB, Suleman H, et al. Refractory glaucoma-tube or diode? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:771–777
- DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188
- Aujla JS, Lee GA, Vincent SJ, et al. Incidence of hypotony and sympathetic ophthalmia following trans scleral cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma and a report of risk factors. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2013;41:761–772
- Ishida K. Update on results and complications of cyclophotocoagulation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:102–110
- Smith SL, Starita RJ, Fellman RL, et al. Early clinical experience with the Baerveldt 350-mm2 glaucoma implant and associated extraocular muscle imbalance. Ophthalmol 1993;100:914–918
- Schwartz KS, Lee RK, Gedde SJ. Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:181–189
- Shah AA, WuDunn D, Cantor LB. Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:455–460
- Burgoyne JK, WuDunn D, Lakhani V, et al. Outcomes of sequential tube shunts in complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmol 2000;107:309–314
- Godfrey DG, Krishna R, Greenfield DS, et al. Implantation of second glaucoma drainage devices after failure of primary devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002;33:37–43
- Smith M, Buys YM, Trope GE. Second Ahmed valve insertion in the same eye. J Glaucoma 2009;18:336–340
- Wang JC, See JL, Chew PT. Experience with the use of Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implants in an Asian population. Ophthalmol 2004;111:1383–1388
- Tsai JC, Johnson CC, Dietrich MS. The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome. Ophthalmol 2003;110:1814–1821
- Syed HM, Law SK, Nam SH, et al. Baerveldt-350 implant versus Ahmed valve for refractory glaucoma: a case-controlled comparison. J Glaucoma 2004;13:38–45
- Smith MF, Doyle JW, Sherwood MB. Comparison of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant with the double-plate Molteno drainage implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:444–447
- Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Monshizadeh R, et al. Comparison of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002;33:94–101