Corneal Transplantation and Glaucoma

References

• Eye Bank Association of America. Eye Banking Statistical Report. 2013. Available at www.restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2012_Statistical_Report_FINAL-reduced-size-4-10.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:819–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mohaimeed M, Al-Shahwan S, Al-Torbak A, Wagoner MD. Escalation of glaucoma therapy after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2281–2286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak-Stroligo M, Alpeza-Dunato Z, Kovacevic D, Caljkusic-Mance T. Specular microscopy in glaucoma patients. Coll Antropol 2010;34(Suppl 2):209–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Australian Corneal Graft Registry. 1990 to 1992 report. Aust NZ J Opthamol 1993;21:1–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea 1992;11:427–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons RB, Stern RA, Teekhasaenee C, Kenyon KR. Elevated intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1989;87:79–91; discussion 3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sekhar GC, Vyas P, Nagarajan R, et al. Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1993;41:181–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan CM, Wong TY, Yeong SM, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in the Singapore National Eye Centre and donor cornea acquisition in the Singapore Eye Bank. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;26:395–400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orucoglu F, Blumenthal EZ, Frucht-Pery J, Solomon A. Risk factors and incidence of ocular hypertension after penetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma 2013;1--7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihota R, Sharma N, Panda A, et al. Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma: Risk factors, management and visual outcome. Aust NZ J Opthamol 1998;26:305–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1855–1865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman I, Carley F, Hillarby C, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty: Indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye 2009;23:1288–1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagoner MD, Ba-Abbad R, Al-Mohaimeed M, et al; King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Corneal Transplant Study G. Postoperative complications after primary adult optical penetrating keratoplasty: Prevalence and impact on graft survival. Cornea 2009;28:385–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer RF, Musch DC. Assessment of success and complications of triple procedure surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1987;85:350–367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polack FM. Keratoplasty in aphakic eyes with corneal edema: Results in 100 cases with 10-year follow-up. Ophthalmic Surg 1980;11:701–707
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sit M, Weisbrod DJ, Naor J, Slomovic AR. Corneal graft outcome study. Cornea 2001;20:129–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugar A, Tanner JP, Dontchev M, et al. Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1023–1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshu A, Lim LS, Htoon HM, Tan DT. Postoperative risk factors influencing corneal graft survival in the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:442–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RM, Jones MN, Batterbury M, et al. Effect of glaucoma on corneal graft survival according to indication for penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:257–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay KH, Chan WK. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;26:132–137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rumelt S, Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U. Preexisting and postoperative glaucoma in repeated corneal transplantation. Cornea 2002;21:759–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanzlin DJ, Robin JB, Gomez DS, et al. Results of penetrating keratoplasty for aphakic and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:302–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Janarthanan M, Rao GN. Causes of corneal graft failure in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998;46:149–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aasuri MK, Garg P, Gokhle N, Gupta S. Penetrating keratoplasty in children. Cornea 2000;19:140–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan DT, Janardhanan P, Zhou H, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: The Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:975–982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuppin P, Poinard C, Loty B, Delbosc B. Risk factors for corneal regraft in patients on the French waiting list. Cornea 2004;23:704–711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan TD, Jones MN, Rushton S, et al. Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:621–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyala RS. Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;45:91–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson RJ, Kaufman HE. A mathematical description of causative factors and prevention of elevated intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977;16:1085–1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdurmus M, Cohen EJ, Yildiz EH, et al. Steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation or glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus or Fuchs dystrophy. Cornea 2009;28:759–764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Surgical management of pseudophakic corneal edema: Complications and visual results following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 1982;13:371–373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry PM, Pashby RC, Tadros ML, et al. An analysis of corneal transplantation: I. Graft clarity. Ann Ophthalmol 1979;11:461–469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lass JH, Pavan-Langston D. Timolol therapy in secondary angle-closure glaucoma post penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1979;86:51–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol 1990;34:325–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisjoly HM, Tourigny R, Bazin R, et al. Risk factors of corneal graft failure. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1728–1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, et al. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies: Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1536–1547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagami S, Suzuki Y, Tsuru T. Risk factors for graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:584–588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinhard T, Kallmann C, Cepin A, et al. The influence of glaucoma history on graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:553–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams KA, Muehlberg SM, Lewis RF, Coster DJ. How successful is corneal transplantation? A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register. Eye 1995;9(Pt 2):219–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedbergh B. Effects of artificial intraocular pressure elevation on the corneal endothelium in the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus ethiops). Acta Ophthalmol 1975;53:839–855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed S, Ben-Sira I, Ben-Shaul Y. Corneal endothelial changes under induced intraocular pressure elevation: A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol 1980;64:164–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelmann E, Pleyer U, Rieck P. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:766–770
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:372–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim N, Gursoy H, Sahin A, et al. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty: Incidence, risk factors, and management. J Ophthalmol 2011;2011:1--6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Long-term follow-up of intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus and Fuchs' dystrophy: Comparison of mechanical and Excimer laser trephination. Cornea 2002;21:368–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franca ET, Arcieri ES, Arcieri RS, Rocha FJ. A study of glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2002;21:284–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoft RA, Gordon JM, Dohlman CH. Gaucoma following keratoplasty. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974;78:OP352–OP364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1987;94:871–874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmley VC, Stonecipher KG, Rowsey JJ. Peters' anomaly: A review of 26 penetrating keratoplasties in infants. Ophthalmic Surg 1993;24:31–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee HS, Kim MS. Influential factors on the survival of endothelial cells after penetrating keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:930–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadag O, Kugu S, Erdogan G, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for increased intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2010;29:278–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne WM, Davison JA, O'Fallon WM. The effects of oversize donor buttons on postoperative intraocular pressure and corneal curvature in aphakic penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1982;89:242–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraolar pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:835–844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karesh JW, Nirankari VS. Factors associated with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:160–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polack FM. Glaucoma in keratoplasty. Cornea 1988;7:67–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman RA, Maris PJ, Jr., Monroe HM, et al. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control in coexisting penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana Ahmed Glaucoma Valves. Cornea 2012;31:350–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Zhao GQ, Che CY, et al. Effect of corneal graft diameter on therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. International J Ophthalmol 2012;5:698–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman T, Olson R, Waltman S, Kaufman H. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure: Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2231–2233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heidemann DG, Sugar A, Meyer RF, Musch DC. Oversized donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty: A randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1807–1811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perl T, Charlton KH, Binder PS. Disparate diameter grafting: Astigmatism, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. Ophthalmology 1981;88:774–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadea L, Bianco G, Mastrofini MC, Balestrazzi E. Penetrating keratoplasty with donor and recipient corneas of the same diameter. Ophthalmic Surg and Lasers 1996;27:425–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olson RJ. Aphakic keratoplasty: Determining donor tissue size to avoid elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2274–2276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuburger M, Maier P, Bohringer D, et al. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: An in vitro model. J Glaucoma 2013;22:584–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan F, Forster RK. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:420–424
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, et al. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye 2011;25:642–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NX, Horn FK, Seitz B, et al. Temporal contrast sensitivity using full-field flicker test (Erlangen flicker test) in patients after penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:443–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NX, Horn FK, Seitz B, et al. Frequency-doubling perimetry in patients following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2004;23:433–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada T, Aggarwal A, Vanathi M, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in opaque grafts with post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea 2008;27:402–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda R, Usui T, Tomidokoro A, et al. Noninvasive observations of peripheral angle in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Cornea 2012;31:259–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memarzadeh F, Li Y, Francis BA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment in secondary glaucoma with corneal opacity after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:189–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to assess secondary glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2009;28:243–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesi TT, Leite DA, Rocha FM, et al. Indications of optical coherence tomography in keratoplasties: Literature review. J Ophthalmol 2012;2012:989063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien AM, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, et al. Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:711–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan JC, Chow K, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation in keratoconus is common following uncomplicated penetrating keratoplasty. Eye 2009;23:2056–2062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED, Kanellopoulos AJ, Grossman GA. Topical cyclosporin A in the management of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea 1997;16:284–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED, Acheampong A, et al. Topical Cyclosporine A in the management of postkeratoplasty glaucoma and corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension (CIOH) and the penetration of topical 0.5% cyclosporine A into the cornea and anterior chamber. The CLAO Journal 1998;24:159–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonmez B, Beden U, Erkan D. Regression of severe corneal stromal neovascularization with topical cyclosporine 0.05% after penetrating keratoplasty for fungal corneal ulcer. Int Ophthalmol 2009;29:123–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skeens HM, Holland EJ. Large-diameter penetrating keratoplasty: Indications and outcomes. Cornea 2010;29:296–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal JS, Mason BF, Kaufman SC. Long-term use of topical tacrolimus (FK506) in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2008;27:488–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraquer J. Immunosuppressive agents in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:61–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson RJ, Kaufman HE, Zimmerman TJ. Effects of timolol and Daranide on elevated intraocular pressure after aphakic keratoplasty. Ann Ophthalmol 1979;11:1833–1836
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konowal A, Morrison JC, Brown SV, et al. Irreversible corneal decompensation in patients treated with topical dorzolamide. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:403–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsuki M, Yokoi N, Mori K, et al. Adverse effects of beta-blocker eye drops on the ocular surface. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2001;105:149–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niiya A, Yokoi N, Matsumoto Y, et al. Effect of beta-blocker eyedrops on corneal epithelial barrier function. Ophthalmologica 2000;214:332–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori M, Araie M, Sakurai M, Oshika T. Effects of pilocarpine and tropicamide on blood-aqueous barrier permeability in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:416–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechtner RD, Khouri AS, Zimmerman TJ, et al. Anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:37–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwar RE, Bullock JD, Ballal D. Cystoid macular edema and anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost use: Experience and incidence in a retrospective review of 94 patients. Ophthalmology 1998;105:263–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumer RA, Camras CB, Mandahl AK. Putative side effects of prostaglandin analogs. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47(Suppl 1):S219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekatomatis P. Herpes simplex dendritic keratitis after treatment with latanoprost for primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1008–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand M, Gilbert CM, Liesegang TJ. Latanoprost and herpes simplex keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:602–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dios Castro E, Maquet Dusart JA. Latanoprost-associated recurrent herpes simplex keratitis. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2000;75:775–778
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price MO, Thompson RW, Jr Price FW Jr. Risk factors for various causes of failure in initial corneal grafts. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1087–1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter WS, Allen RC, Waring GO 3rd, Stulting RD. Laser trabeculoplasty for glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:185–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haddadin RI RD. Lasers in Dermatology and Medicine: Laser/Light Applications in Ophthalmology; New York: Springer, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Nakakura S, Imamura H, Nakamura T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:e404–e406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EJ, Kenyon KR, Dohlman CH. Iridoplasty for prevention of post-keratoplasty angle closure and glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 1982;13:994–996
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang JJ, Allemann N, Cortina MS, et al. Argon laser iridoplasty for optic obstruction of Boston keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:1051–1054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayyala RS, Pieroth L, Vinals AF, et al. Comparison of mitomycin C trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage device implantation, and laser neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of intractable glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1550–1556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman J. What is new after 40 years of glaucoma implants. J Glaucoma 2010;19:504–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuDunn D, Alfonso E, Palmberg PF. Combined penetrating keratoplasty and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 1999;106:396–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuoka S, Honda N, Usui T, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy after trabeculectomy. Eye 2009;23:940–944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insler MS, Cooper HD, Kastl PR, Caldwell DR. Penetrating keratoplasty with trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:593–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkness CM, Steele AD, Ficker LA, Rice NS. Coexistent corneal disease and glaucoma managed by either drainage surgery and subsequent keratoplasty or combined drainage surgery and penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:146–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Kumar S, Ram J, Gupta A. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C for postkeratoplasty glaucoma: A preliminary study. Ophthalmic Surg and Lasers 1997;28:891–895
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishioka M, Shimazaki J, Yamagami J, et al. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:714–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almousa R, Nanavaty MA, Daya SM, Lake DB. Intraocular pressure control and corneal graft survival after implantation of Ahmed valve device in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2013;32:1099–1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman AL, Mondino BJ, Wilson MR, Casey R. Clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant in eyes with prior or concurrent penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:54–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knape RM, Szymarek TN, Tuli SS, et al. Five-year outcomes of eyes with glaucoma drainage device and penetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma 2012;21:608–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer MT, Tiedeman JS, Olsakovsky LA, et al. Long-term intraocular pressure control and corneal graft survival in eyes with a pars plana Baerveldt implant and corneal transplant. J Glaucoma 2010;19:124–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritterband DC, Shapiro D, Trubnik V, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty with pars plana glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea 2007;26:1060–1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander DA, Giaconi JA, Holland GN, et al. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valves. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:169–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapuano CJ, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, et al. Results of alloplastic tube shunt procedures before, during, or after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 1995;14:26–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe WE, Starita RJ, Fellman RL, et al. The use of Molteno implant and anterior chamber tube shunt to encircling band for the treatment of glaucoma in keratoplasty patients. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1414–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood MB, Smith MF, Driebe WT Jr, et al. Drainage tube implants in the treatment of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 1993;24:185–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arroyave CP, Scott IU, Fantes FE, et al. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage device implantation. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1978–1985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon YH, Taylor JM, Hong S, et al. Long-term results of eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage tube implant. Ophthalmology 2001;108:272–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidoti PA, Mosny AY, Ritterband DC, Seedor JA. Pars plana tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with coexisting glaucoma and corneal disease. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1050–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell PJ, Robin JB, Schanzlin DJ, et al. Molteno implant for control of glaucoma in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1988;95:364–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkness CM, Ling Y, Rice NS. The use of silicone drainage tubing to control post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Eye 1988;2(Pt 5):583–590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Torbak A. Graft survival and glaucoma outcome after simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Cornea 2003;22:194–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarenga LS, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD, et al. The long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:200–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda A, Prakash VJ, Dada T, et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve in post-penetrating-keratoplasty glaucoma: A critically evaluated prospective clinical study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:185–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, et al. Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:198–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman J. Management of the Molteno silicone tube in corneal transplant surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Las 1998;29:432–434
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner A, Cohn AD, Balasubramaniam M, Weiner AJ. Glaucoma tube shunt implantation through the ciliary sulcus in pseudophakic eyes with high risk of corneal decompensation. J Glaucoma 2010;19:405–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy NS, Bonney RC. Transscleral YAG cyclocoagulation of the ciliary body for persistently high intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 1989;8:178–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardten DR, Brown JD, Holland EJ. Results of Neodymium: YAG laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for postkeratoplasty glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1993;2:241–245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Threlkeld AB, Shields MB. Noncontact transscleral Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:569–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelt S, Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U. Persistent epithelial defects and ulcers in repeated corneal transplantation: Incidence, causative agents, predisposing factors and treatment outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1139–1145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EJ, Schwartz LW, Luskind RD, et al. Neodymium: YAG laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 1989;20:713–716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah P, Lee GA, Kirwan JK, et al. Cyclodiode photocoagulation for refractory glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1986–1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocakoglu O, Arslan OS, Kayiran A. Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of refractory glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:569–574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JW, Smith MF. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Semin Ophthalmol 1994;9:254–257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binder PS, Abel R Jr, Kaufman HE. Cyclocryotherapy for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:489–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Wang YJ, Chen JQ, et al. Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on survival of corneal grafts. Chinese J Ophthalmol 2007;43:313–318
   Google Scholar
• Haller JA. Transvitreal endocyclophotocoagulation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996;94:589–676
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo SH, Hurmeric V. Femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:189–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain WD, Rush SW, Mathers WD, et al. Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2011;118:486–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid M, Steinert RF, Gaster RN, et al. Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1638–1643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger MM, Mootha VV. First report of traumatic globe rupture after femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2012;31:1504–1506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M. A new lamellar wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:260–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush SW, Fraunfelder FW, Mathers WD, Chamberlain WD. Femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty in failed penetrating keratoplasty and globe trauma. Cornea 2011;30:1358–1362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiserman I, Bahar I, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS. Half top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty: 1-year results. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1629–1633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiserman I, Bahar I, Rootman DS. Half-top-hat: A new wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:143–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: Surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet's membrane. Cornea 2002;21:374–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:398–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YM, Wu SQ, Yao YF. Long-term comparison of full-bed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating keratoconus. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 2013;14:438–450
   Google Scholar
• Musa FU, Patil S, Rafiq O, et al. Long-term risk of intraocular pressure elevation and glaucoma escalation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:780–785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, Tsubota K. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:159–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan DT, Anshu A, Parthasarathy A, Htoon HM. Visual acuity outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A case-control study. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1295–1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:744–751 e1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan MA, Roberts F, Hegarty B, Ramaesh K. The outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in herpes simplex virus-related corneal scarring, complications and graft survival. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1300–1303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17:618–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Lander F, Nieuwendaal C. Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: A case report of a modified technique. Cornea 2002;21:325–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: Early clinical results. Cornea 2001;20:239–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: Early complications and their management. Cornea 2006;25:37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandling GR Jr, Parikh M, Robinson C, et al. Escalation of glaucoma therapy after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2010;29:991–995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Safety and outcomes: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1818–1830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisseiev E, Varssano D, Rosenfeld E, Rachmiel R. Intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:179–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosker M, Suri K, Duman F, et al. Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: Fellow eye comparison. Cornea 2013;32:1083–1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EW, Wong TT, Htoon HM, et al. De novo ocular hypertension after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Comparative 3-year incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Clinical Ophthalmology 2013;7:1829–1841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wandling GR Jr, Rauen MP, Goins KM, et al. Glaucoma therapy escalation in eyes with pseudophakic corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol 2012;32:9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boey PY, Mehta JS, Ho CL, et al. Outcomes of trabeculectomy after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A comparison with penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:1091–1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, et al. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1644–1650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak SK, Basak S. Complications and management in Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Analysis of consecutive 430 cases. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:209–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier AK, Klamann MK, Torun N, et al. Intraocular pressure elevation and post-DSEK glaucoma after Descemet`s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251:1191–1198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MB, Lieu P, Mootha VV, et al. Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:223–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek DT, Wong T, Tan D, Mehta JS. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:48–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Desai NR, Schmidt GW, et al. Secondary angle closure caused by air migrating behind the pupil in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2009;28:652–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockington D, Luo X, Wang H, et al. Mathematical and computer simulation modelling of intracameral forces causing pupil block due to air bubble use in Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: The mechanics of iris buckling. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:182–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:411–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwendaal CP, van der Meulen IJ, Lapid-Gortzak R, Mourits MP. Intraocular pressure after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Int Ophthalmol 2013;33:147–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide T, Yoo SH, Leng T, O'Brien TP. Subconjunctival air leakage after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty(DSAEK) in a post-trabeculectomy eye. Open Ophthalmol J 2009;3:1–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banitt M, Arrieta-Quintero E, Parel JM, Fantes F. Technique for air bubble management during endothelial keratoplasty in eyes after penetrating glaucoma surgery. Cornea 2011;30:184–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Long-term graft survival and risk factors for failure in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1982–1987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Jordan CS, Moore G, Price FW Jr. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: Part two: The statistical analysis of probability and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:391–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldave AJ, Chen JL, Zaman AS, et al. Outcomes after DSEK in 101 eyes with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt implantation. Cornea 2014;33:223–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen P, Khashabi S, Chopra V, et al. Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: A comparative study of outcome in patients with preexisting glaucoma. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2013;27:73–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu HY, Edelstein SL. Two-year outcomes of an initial series of DSAEK cases in normal and abnormal eyes at an inner-city university practice. Cornea 2013;32:1069–1074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz KM, Sugar J, Tu EY, et al. Early results of Descemet-stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients with glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea 2009;28:959–962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decroos FC, Delmonte DW, Chow JH, et al. Increased rates of Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft failure and dislocation in glaucomatous eyes with aqueous shunts. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2012;7:203–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim P, Amiran MD, Lichtinger A, et al. Outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in patients with previous glaucoma drainage device insertion. Cornea 2012;31:172–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goshe JM, Terry MA, Li JY, et al. Graft dislocation and hypotony after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in patients with previous glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1130–1133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiaux C, Baghdasaryan E, Lee OL, et al. Outcomes after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in glaucoma patients with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt implantation. Cornea 2011;30:1304–1311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips PM, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt procedures: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Cornea 2010;29:534–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements JL, Bouchard CS, Lee WB, et al. Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:414–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg ED, Levin KH, Savetsky MJ, et al. Surgical outcomes of DSAEK in patients with prior Ahmed glaucoma drainage device placement. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013;23:807–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letko E, Price DA, Lindoso EM, et al. Secondary graft failure and repeat endothelial keratoplasty after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2011;118:310–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011;118:725–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezon I, Shih CY, Rosen LM, et al. Immunologic graft rejection in Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1360–1365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2368–2373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:1082–1090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveiras M, Dirisamer M, Parker J, et al. Causes of glaucoma after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:958–966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. DMEK complications. Cornea 2014;33:101–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersudsky V, Trevino A, Rumelt S. Management of endothelial decompensation because of glaucoma shunt tube touch by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and tube revision. Cornea 2011;30:709–711
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heindl LM, Koch KR, Bucher F, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with glaucoma implants. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:e241–e244; discussion 1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, et al. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:780–786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawatari Y, Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2011;55:98–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks C, Crawford G, Chirila T, et al. Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19:149–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, Dohlman CH. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: Enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2007;47:61–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study G: Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew HF, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, et al. Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications. Cornea 2009;28:989–996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley JC, Hernandez EG, Schwab IR, Mannis MJ. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: The University of California Davis experience. Cornea 2009;28:321–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamyar R, Weizer JS, de Paula FH, et al. Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2012;31:134–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AP, Wu EI, Ritterband DC, Seedor JA. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: The New York Eye and Ear experience. Eye 2012;26:418–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JJ, de la Cruz J, Cortina MS. Visual outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation as the primary penetrating corneal procedure. Cornea 2012;31:1436–1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Lou X, et al. Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor: Device, preliminary outcomes and complications. Eye 2003;17:385–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalam KV, Chokshi A, Agarwal S, Edward DP. Complications of AlphaCor keratoprosthesis: A clinicopathologic report. Cornea 2007;26:1258–1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Paul B, Tandon R, et al. The osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP). Semin Ophthalmol 2005;20:113–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falcinelli G, Falsini B, Taloni M, et al. Modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in 181 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1319–1329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hille K, Grabner G, Liu C, et al. Standards for modified osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) surgery according to Strampelli and Falcinelli: The Rome-Vienna Protocol. Cornea 2005;24:895–908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Pillai VS, Srinivasan B, et al. Modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: The Indian experience: Results of the first 50 cases. Cornea 2010;29:771–776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar RS, Tan DT, Por YM, et al. Glaucoma management in patients with osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP): The Singapore OOKP Study. J Glaucoma 2009;18:354–360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcinelli GC, Falsini B, Taloni M, et al. Detection of glaucomatous damage in patients with osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:129–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar