Effect of Histone and Histone-RNA Complexes on the Disease Process of Murine Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

References

• Robbins W. B., Holman H. R., Dicher H., Kunkel H. G. Complement fixation with cell nuclei and DNA in lupus crythematosus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1957; 96: 575–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollar B. D. Nucleic acids as antigens. The antigens, M. Scla. Acadmic Press, New York 1973; 1: 1–85
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz R. S. Monoclonal lupus autoantibodies. Immunology Today 1983; 4: 68–69
   Google Scholar
• Cliused T. M., Steinberg A. D., Talal N. The clearance and localization of nucleic acids by New Zealand and normal mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol 1972; 12: 465–476
   Google Scholar
• Emlen W., Mannik M. Effect of DNA size and strandedness on the in vivo clearance and organ localization of DNA. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1984; 56: 185–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaio M. P., Hodder S., Schwartz R., Stollar B. D. Responsiveness of autoimmune and normal mice to nucleic acid antigens. J. Immunol. 1984; 132: 872–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekvig O. P., Hannestad K. Lupus crythematosus (LE) factors recognize both nuclcosomes and viable human leucocytes. Scand. J. Immunol. 1981; 13: 597–604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher C. L., Shores E. W., Eisenberg R. A., Cohen P. L. Cellular interactions for the in vitro production of anti-chromatin autoantibodies in MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr mice. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1989; 50: 231–240
   Google Scholar
• Fournie G. J. Circulating DNA and lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 1988; 33: 487–497
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rumore P. M., Steinman C. R. Endogenous circulating DNA In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J. Clin. Invest. 1990; 86: 69–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapf F., Herrmann M., Leitmann W., Kalden J. R. Antibody binding of macromolecular DNA and RNA in the plasma of SLE patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1989; 75: 336–342
   Google Scholar
• Atanassov C., Briand J. P., Bonnier D., Van Regenmortel M. H. V., Muller S. New Zealand white rabbits immunized with RNA-complexed total histones developed an autoimmune-like response. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1991; 86: 124–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michalski-Scrive C., Aubert J. P., Couppez M., Biserte G., Louchcux-Lefebvre M. H. UV differential study of the histones H2A-H2B-H3-H4 octamer. Biochimie 1982; 64: 347–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellar B. D., Ward M. Rabbit antibodies to histone fractions as specific reagents for preparative and comparative studies. J. Biol. Chem. 1970; 245: 1261–1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns E. W. Studies of histones 7. Preparative methods for histone fractions from calf thymus. Biochem. J. 1964; 92: 55–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Page S., Williams W., Parkhouse D. Relationship between lymphocytotoxic antibodies, anti-DNA antibodies, and a common anti-DNA idiotype PR4 in patients with SLE, their relatives and spouses. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1989; 77: 314–318
   Google Scholar
• Watts R., Williams W., Le Page S., et al. Analysis of auto-antibody reactivity and common idiotype PR4 expression of myeloma proteins. J. Autoimmun. 1989; 2: 689–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monestier M., Fasy T. M., Losman M. J. Structure and binding properties of monoclonal antibodies to core histones from autoimmune mice. Mol. Immuno. 1993; 30: 1069–1075
   Google Scholar
• Barakat S., Briand J. P., Weber J. C., Van Regenmortel M. H. V., Muller S. Recognition of synthetic peptides of Sm-D autoantigen by lupus sera. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1990; 81: 256–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricchiuti V., Briand J. P., Meyer O., Iscnberg D. A., Pruijn G., Muller S. Epitope mapping with synthetic peptides of 52-kD SSA/Ro protein reveals heterogeneous antibody profiles in human autoimmune sera. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1994; 95: 397–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkeson G. S., Grudier J. P., Pisetsky D. S. The antibody response of normal mice to immunization with single stranded DNA of various species origin. Clin. Immunol. Immunopath. 1989; 51: 361–370
   Google Scholar
• Davis P., Russell A. S., Percy J. S. Antibodies to UV light denature DNA in SLE. J. Rheumatol. 1976; 3: 375–379
   Google Scholar
• Lafer E. M., Mollar A., Nordheim A., Stollar B. D., Rich A. Antibodies specific for left-handed Z-DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. (USA) 1981; 78: 3546–3550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaio M. P., Hodder S., Schwartz R., Stollar B. D. Responsiveness of autoimmune and normal mice to nucleic acid antigens. J. Immunol. 1984; 132: 872–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank M., Mendelovic S., Mozes E., Shoenfeld Y. Induction of SLE-like disease in naive mice with a monoclonal anti-DNA antibody derived from a patient with polymyositis carrying the 16/6 ID. J. Autoimmun. 1988; 1: 683–691
   Google Scholar
• Puccetti A., Koizumi T., Migliorini P., Andrew-Schwartz J., Barrett K. J., Schwartz R. S. An immunoglobulin light chain from a lupus-prone mouse induces autoantibodies in normal mice. J. Exp. Med. 1990; 171: 1919–1930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum D., Rauch J., Stolkur B. D., Schwartz R. S. In vivo effects of antibodies against high frequency idiotypes of anti-DNA antibodies in MRL mice. J. Immunol. 1984; 132: 1282–1285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iscnberg D. A., Staines N. A. DNA antibody idiotypes An Analysis of their role in Health and Disease. J. Autoimmun. 1990; 3: 339–356
   Google Scholar
• Ravirajan C. T., Staines N. A. Involvement in lupus disease of idiotypes Id. F-423 and Id. IV-228 defined respectively upon fetal and adult MRL/MP-lpr/lpr DNA-binding monoclonal autoantibodies. Immunol. 1991; 74: 342–347
   Google Scholar
• Iscnberg D. A., Katz D., Le Page S., et al. Indipendent analysis of the 16/6 idiotype lupus model. A role for an environmental factor?. J. Immunol. 1991; 147: 4172–4177
   Google Scholar
• Gilkeson G. S., Pritchard A. J., Pisetsky D. S. Specificity of antiDNA antibodies induced in normal mice by immunization with bacterial DNA. Clin. Immunol. Immunopath. 1991; 59: 288–300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worral J., Snaith M., Batchelor R., Isenberg D. A. SLE-a rhcumatological view. Q. J. Med. 1990; 275: 319–330
   Google Scholar
• Howie J. B., Helyer B. J. The immunology and pathology of NZB mice. Adv. Immunol. 1968; 9: 215–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thcofilopoulos A. N., Dixon F. J. Murine models of systemic lupus crythematosus. Adv. Immunol. 1985; 37: 269–390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinberg R. T., Miller M. L., Steinberg A. D. Effect of the BSXB Y chromosome accelerating gene on autoantibody production. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1985; 35: 67–72
   Google Scholar
• Kelley V. E., Roths J. B. Interaction of mutant lpr gene with background strain influences renal disease. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1985; 37: 220–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller S., Chaix M. L., Briand J. P., Van Regenmortel M. H. V. Immunogenicity of free histones and of histones complexed with RNA. Mol. Immunol. 1991; 28: 763–772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardin J. A., Thomas J. O. Antibodies to histones in systemic lupus crythematosus: localization of prominent autoantigen on histones HI and H2B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1983; 80: 7410–7414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohill J., Cary P. D., Couppez M., Fritzler M. J. Antibodies from patients with drug-induced and idiopathic lupus crythematosus react with epitopes restricted to the amino and carboxyl termini of histone. J. Immunol. 1985; 135: 3116–3121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller S., Bonnier D., Thiry M., Van Regenmortel M. H. Reactivity of autoantibodies in systemic lupus crythematosus with synthetic core histone peptides. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 1989; 89: 288–296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar