Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety between Interspinous Process Distraction Device and Open Decompression Surgery in Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta Analysis

REFERENCES

• Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, et al. Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? JAMA. 2010;304(23):2628–2636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymoyer JW. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2(1):9–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarrett MS, Orlando JF, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazanec DJ, Podichetty VK, Hsia A. Lumbar canal stenosis: start with nonsurgical therapy. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69(11):909–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, et al. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(6):879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AP, Smith ZA, Lall RR, et al. The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:325095. doi: 10.1155/2012/325095.
   Google Scholar
• Wu WJ, Liang Y, Zhang XK, Cao P, Zheng T. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(14):2505–2510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi X, McPherson B. Application of X STOP device in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Physician. 2010;13(5):E327–e336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson PA, Tribus CB, Kitchel SH. Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg-Spine. 2006;4(6): 463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(1):22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication - Two-year follow-up results. Spine. 2005;30(12):1351–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moojen WA, Arts MP, Bartels RH, et al. Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(10):1596–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, et al. Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):530–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulinskaya E, Dollinger MB, Bjorkestol K. Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference. Biometrics. 2011;67(1):203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulinskaya E, Dollinger MB, Knight E, Gao H. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2004;23(23):3655–3670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondrashov DMD, Hannibal MMD, Hsu KMD, et al. The X STOP interspinous process decompression versus laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: economic analysis: 816. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(2):458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CD, Sun HL, Lu HZ. Comparison of the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation and interspinous fixation on the stiffness of adjacent segments. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(9):1732–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moojen WA, Arts MP, Brand R, et al. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disord. 2010;11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lurie J, McDonough C, Zhao W, et al. Comparator health outcomes for x-stop(r) cost-effectiveness analyses: GP204. Spine: Affiliated Society Meeting Abstracts October. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Richter A, Halm HF, Hauck M, et al. 2-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825f7203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter A, Schuetz C, Hauck M, et al. Does an interspinous device (Coflex (TM)) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RJ, Errico TJ, Bae H, et al. Decompression and Coflex(R) interlaminar stabilization compared to decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38(18):1529–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Hartjen CA, et al. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted. J Neurosurg-Spine. 2006;5(6):500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromqvist BHMDP, Berg SMDP, Gerdhem PMDP, et al. X-Stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2013;38(17):1436–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer F, Yagdiran A, Neu P, et al. Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2015–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY, et al. X STOP versus decompression for neurogenic claudication: economic and clinical analysis. Int J Minim Invasive Surg Technol. 2007;1(2):22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(2):330–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S, et al. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J. 2009;18(6):830–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, et al. The efficacy of lumbar hybrid stabilization using the DIAM to delay adjacent segment degeneration: an intervention comparison study with a minimum two-year follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2013. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828e8ddc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menchetti P, Postachini F. Aperius® interspinous spacer vs open surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Int J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol. 2009;3(4):7-.
   Google Scholar
• Park SC, Yoon SH, Hong YP, et al. Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex). J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;46(4):292–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postacchini R, Ferrari E, Cinotti G, et al. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2011;11(10):933–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu SJ, Kim IS. Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;47(5):338–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobottke R, Rollinghoff M, Siewe J, et al. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53(4):179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzazi A, Elhawary Y. Dynamic stabilization using X-stop versus transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis; comparative study of the clinical outcome. Neurosurg Q. 2010;20(3):165–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Martin BI, Ching A, et al. Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(10):865–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holinka J, Krepler P, Matzner M, et al. Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Bak KH, Chun HJ, et al. Posterior interspinous fusion device for one-level fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison with pedicle screw fixation—preliminary report of at least one year follow up. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;52(4):359–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JHT, et al. Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(1):E7–E7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaulhausen T, Knoell P, Stein G, et al. Efficacy of an interspinous decompression device versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: an example for a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Invest. 2012;2(12):1163–1169.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore G, Ackerman SJ, Bergin C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP (R) interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis a comparison with conservative care and laminectomy. Spine. 2011;36(5):E345–E56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett MG, Stein SC, Bartels RH. Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(1):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X-y. [Influence of data imbalance on the analysis results of experiment]. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agri For. 2004;32(1):103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht F G BJC. Two-stage analysis based on a mixed model:large-sample asymptomatic theory and small-sample simulation results. Biometrics. 1985;41:477–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar