REFERENCES
- Al-Qattan MM. Vicryl rapide® versus vicryl® suture in skin closure of the hand in children: a randomized prospective study. J Hand Surg Br Eur. 2005;30(1):90–91.
- Leroux N, Bujold E. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1585–1590.
- Bharathi A, Reddy DBD, Kote GSS. A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(2):326–330.
- Kokanalı D, Ugur M, Kuntay Kokanalı M, et al. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(2):275–280.
- Luck AM, Galvin SL, Theofrastous JP. Suture erosion and wound dehiscence with permanent versus absorbable suture in reconstructive posterior vaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1626–1629.
- Huffaker RK, Muir TW, Rao A, et al. Histologic response of porcine collagen-coated and uncoated polypropylene grafts in a rabbit vagina model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):582.e1–e7.
- Walter AJ, Morse AN, Leslie KO, et al. Histologic evaluation of human cadaveric fascia lata in a rabbit vagina model. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(2): 136–142.
- Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials [Acta Biomater. 8 (2012) 978–987]. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2871.
- Verspyck E, Sentilhes L, Roman H, et al. Techniques chirurgicales de l’épisiotomie. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2006;35, Supplement 1(0):40–51.
- Williams MK, Chames MC. Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):755–759.
- Klinge U, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B. Functional assessment and tissue response of short- and long-term absorbable surgical meshes. Biomaterials 2001;22(11):1415–1424.
- McCaul LK, Bagg J, Jenkins WMM. Rate of loss of irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) from the mouth: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38(4):328–330.
- Duprez K, Bilweis J, Duprez A, et al. Etude expérimentale et clinique d'un matériel de suture cutanée à résorption rapide. Ann Chir Main. 1988;7(1):91–96.
- Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Online 2010;6:CD000006.
- Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, et al. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 29 2002;359(9325):2217–2223.
- Shafath A, Bonanthaya K, Shetty P, et al. Role of absorbable suture material (vicryl rapide 5-0) for skin closure in infants undergoing cheiloplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(11):988.