High-Dose Narcotic Anesthesia Using Sufentanil in Swine for Cardiac Catheterization and Electrophysiologic Studies

References

• Schumann R E, Swindle M M, Carabello B A, Spinale F G, Nakano K. Sufentanil anesthesia for cardiopulmonary bypass and mitral valve replacement in dogs with left ventricular volume overload. Lab Anim Sci. 1989; 39: 482
   Google Scholar
• Swindle M M, Horneffer P J, Gardner J J, Gott V L, Hall T S, Stuart R S, Baumgartner W, Borron A M, Galloway E, Reitz B A. Anatomic and anesthetic considerations in experimental cardiopulmonary surgery in swine. Lab Anim Sci. 1986; 36: 357–361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaymes C H, Swindle M M, Harold M E, Schumann R E, Gillette P C. Percutaneous serial catheterization in swine: a practical approach. J Invest Surg. 1991; 4: 389
   Google Scholar
• Gillette P C, Swindle M M, Thompson R P, Case C L. Transvenous cryoablation of the bundle of His. PACE. 1991; 14: 504–510
   Google Scholar
• Gillette P C, Buckles D S, Harold M E, Carson A, Jr. Intracardiac electrophysiology studies. Pediatric Arrhythmias: Electrophysiology and Pacing, PC Gillette, A Carson, Jr. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia
   Google Scholar
• Gillette P C, Carson A, Jr, Zinner A J, Kugler J D. Continuous computer automated measurement of physiologic data during catheterization. Proc Comp Cardiol. 1981; 391–393
   Google Scholar
• Zinner A J, Gillette P C, Combs W. Totally automated electrophysiologic testing of sinus node function. Am Heart J. 1984; 108: 1024–1028
   Google Scholar
• Buckles D S, Harold M E, Gillette P C, Fyfe D A, Blair H L, Taylor A B, Wiles H B. Real-time, automated interactive cardiac electrophysiology testing. PACE. 1990; 13: 45–51
   Google Scholar
• Narula O s, Samet P, Javier R P. Significance of the sinus node recovery time. Circulation. 1972; 45: 140–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus H C, Saroff A L, Bigger J T. Premature atrial stimulation as a key to the understanding of sinoatrial conduction in man. Circulation. 1973; 47: 86–93
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R R, Eger E l, Wilson C A. Comparative interaction of epinephrine with enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in men. Anesth Analg. 1976; 55: 709–712
   Google Scholar
• Schumann R E, Harold M E, Gillette P C, Swindle M M, Gaymes C H. Prophylactic treatment experimental cardiac catheterization and electrophysiologic testing. AALAS Bulletin 1991; 30: 32
   Google Scholar
• Stoops C M, Curtis C A, Kovach D A, McCammon R L, Stoelting R K, Warren T M, Miller D, Aboo-Donia M M. Hemodynamic effects of doxacurium chloride in patients receiving oxygen sufentanil anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 365–370
   Google Scholar
• Bovill J G, Sebel P S, Balckburn C L, Oei-Lim V, Heykants J J. The pharmokinetics of sufentanil in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1984; 61502–506
   Google Scholar
• Sanford T J, Smith N T, Dec-Silver H., Harrison W K. A comparison among morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil anesthesia for open heart surgery: induction, emergences and extubation. Anesth Analg. 1986; 65: 259–267
   Google Scholar
• Sebel P S, Bovill J G. Cardiovascular effects of sufentanil anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1982; 61: 115–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill J G, Warren P J, Schuller J L, van Wezel H B, Hoenveld M H. Comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery. Anesth Analg. 1984; 63: 1081–1086
   Google Scholar
• Schmeling W T, Kampine J P, Warltier D C. Negative chronotropic actions of sufentanil and vecuronium in chronically instrumented dogs pre-treated with propranolol and/or diltiazem. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 4–14
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Rasool I H, Ward D S. Ventilatory and cardiovascular responses to sufentanil infusion in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 300–306
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe T J, Domalik-Wawrzynski L, Guerrers J L, Rosow C E, Lowenstein E, Powell W J, Jr. Local and neurally mediated effects of sufentanil on canine skeletal muscle vascular resistance. J Plarmacol Exp Ther. 1987; 242: 699–706
   Google Scholar
• Reddy P, Liu W S, Port D, Gilmor S., Stanley T H. Comparison of haemodynamic effects of anesthetic doses of alphaprodine and sufentanil in the dog. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1980; 27: 345–350
   Google Scholar
• Benson G J, Thurmon J C, Tranquilli W J, Corbin J E. Intravenous administration of lenperone and glycopyrrolate followed by continuous infusion of sufentanil in dogs: cardiovascular effects. Am J Vet Res. 1987; 48: 1372–1375
   Google Scholar
• Hall R I, Murphy M R, Hug C C. The enflurane sparing effect of sufentanil in dogs. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 518–525
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Rascol I H, Ward D S. Ventilatory and cardiovascular responses to sufentanil infusion in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 300–306
   Google Scholar
• de Lange S, Boscoe M J, Stanley T H, Pace N. Comparison of sufentanil-O2, and fentanyl- O2, for coronary artery surgery. Anesthesiology 1982; 56: 112–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen J, Berthelsen P, Ahn N C, Rasmussen J P. Early response in central haemodynamics to high doses of sufentanil or morphine in dogs. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 1981; 25: 33–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosow C E, Philbin D M, Moss J, Keegan C R, Schneider R C. Sufentanil vs fentanyl: ± suppression of haemodynamic responses. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: A323
   Google Scholar
• de Castro J, van de Water A, Wouters L, Xhonneux R, Reneman R, Kay B. Comparative study of cardiovascular, neurological and metabolic side effects of eight narcotics in dogs. Parts 1–4. Acta Anesthesiol Belg. 1979; 30: 5–99
   Google Scholar