Effect of Preoperative Thoracic Duct Drainage on Canine Kidney Transplantation

References

• Medawar PB. The behavior and fate of skin autografts and skin homografts in rabbits. J Anat 1994; 78: 176–199
   Google Scholar
• Depster WJ, Lennox B, Boag JW. Prolongation of survival of skin homotransplants in the rabbit by irradiation of the host. Br J Exp Pathol 1950; 31: 670–679
   Google Scholar
• Billingham RE, Krohn PL, Medawar PB. Effect of cortisone on survival of skin homografts in rabbits. Br Med J 1951; 1: 1157–1163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz R, Dameshek W. Drug-induced immunological tolerance. Nature 1959; 183: 1682–1683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz R, Dameshek W. The effect of 6-mercaptopunne on homograft reactions. J Clin Invest 1960; 39: 952–958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker W, Condie R, Weiner D, Barco R, Good R. Prolongation of skin homograft survival in rabbits by 6-mercaptopurine. Proc Soc BiolMed 1959; 102: 459–461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowans JL. The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph in the rat. J Physiol 1959; 146: 54–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor DD, Gowans JL. Antibody response of rats depleted of lymphocytes by chronic drainage from the thoracic duct. J Exp Med 1963; 117: 303–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodruff M FA, Anderson NF. Effect of lymphocyte depletion by thoracic duct fistula and administration of anti-lymphocytic serum on the survival of skin homografts in rats. Nature (London) 1963; 200: 702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franksson C. Survival of homografts of skin in rats depleted of lymphocytes by chronic drainage from the thoracic duct. Lancet (Letter to Editor) 1964; 1: 1331
   Google Scholar
• Franksson C, Lundgren G, Magnusson E, Ringden O. Drainage of thoracic duct lymph in renal transplant patients. Transplantation 1976; 21: 133–140
   Google Scholar
• Newton WT. The biologic basis of tissue transplantation. Surg Clin North Am 1965; 45: 393
   Google Scholar
• Murray JE, Wilson RE, Tilney NL, et al. Five years' experience in renal transplantation with immunosuppressive drugs: survival, function, complications, and the role of lymphocytes depletion by thoracic duct fistula. Ann Surg 1968; 168: 416–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archimbaud JP, Banssillon V, Banssillon G. Technique, surveillance et interet de drainage du canal thoracique, efecture en vue d'une transplantation renal. J Chir Paris 1969; 98: 211
   Google Scholar
• Traeger J, Touranine JL, Archibaud JP, Malik MC, Dubernard JM. Thoracic duct drainage and antilymphocyte globulin for renal transplantation in man. Kidney Int 1978; 13(suppl 8)103–107
   Google Scholar
• Sales HE, Remmers AR, Jr., Fish PI, et al. Depletion of lymphocytes for protection of renal allografts. Arch Intern Med 1970; 125: 443
   Google Scholar
• Johnson HK, Niblack GD, Tallent MB, Richie RE. Immunologic preparation for cadaveric renal transplant by thoracic duct drainage. Transplant Proc 1977; 9: 1499–1503
   Google Scholar
• Machieder HI, Paulus H. Clinical and immunological alternations observed in patients undergoing long-term thoracic duct drainage. Surgery 1978; 84: 157–165
   Google Scholar
• Starzl TE, Weil R, Koep LJ, et al. Thoracic duct fistula and renal transplantation. Ann Surg 1979; 190: 474–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starzl TE, Weil R, Koep LJ, Iwaki Y, Terasaki PI, Schroter G PJ. Thoracic duct drainage before and after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Surgery 1979; 149: 815–821
   Google Scholar
• Starzl TE, Klintmalrn G BG, Iwatsuki S, Weil R. Late follow-up after thoracic duct drainage in cadaveric renal transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 153: 377–382
   Google Scholar
• Lemke H, Hammerling GJ, Hohaan C, Pajewskey K. Hybrid cell lines secreting monoclonal antibody specific for histocompatibility antigens of the mouse. Nature 1978; 271: 249–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julius MH, Simpson E, Herzenberg LA. Rapid method for isolation of functional thymus derived lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1973; 3: 645–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer DC, Hubbard WJ, Koren HS. Tumor cell killing by freshly isolated peripheral blood monocytes. Cell Immunol 1981; 58: 426–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata Y, Juji T, Nishizawa Y, Sakamoto H, Ozawa N. Detection of platelet antibodies by newly developed mixed agglutination with platelets. Vox Sang 1981; 41: 25–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janossy G, Greaves MF, Doenhoff MJ, Snajdr J. Lymphocyte activation v. quantitation of the proliferative responses to mitogens using defined T and B cell populations. Clin Exp Immunol 1973; 14: 581–596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawai T, Stoitchov E, Lorenzini C, Merle M, Benichoux R. Long term follow-up dogs, with a patent anastomosis of thoracic duct to esophagus. Eur Surg Res 1974; 6: 46–55
   Google Scholar
• Dumont AE, Mulholland JH. Effect of thoracic duct to esophagus shunt in dogs with vena cava constriction. Am J Physiol 1963; 204: 289–290
   Google Scholar
• McKneally M, Carey JB, Rogers W, Absolon KB. Technique of thoracic duct-esophagus fistula and its potential clinical application. Surg Forum 1963; 14: 187
   Google Scholar
• Oh CY, Want M CH, Danese CA, Jacobson JH. Anastomosis between thoracic duct and esophagus with microsurgical technique. Surgery 1967; 62: 340–345
   Google Scholar
• Harvey J, Tucker HM, Sessions R, Ogura JH. Long term thoracic duct-esophageal shunt; a new technique. Laryngoscope 1971; 81: 1126–1131
   Google Scholar
• Williamson E PM, Sells RA. The chyloesophageal shunt: a new approach to thoracic duct drainage. Transplantation 1986; 42: 136
   Google Scholar
• Koep LJ, Weil R, Starzl TE. The technique of prolonged thoracic duct drainage in transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980; 151: 61–64
   Google Scholar
• Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous culyure of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975; 256: 495–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff JC, Durkopp N, Aprile J, Tsoi MS, Springmeyer SC, Deeg HJ, Strob R. Two monoclonal antibodies (DLy-1 and DLy-6) directed against canine lymphocytes. Exp Hematol 1982; 10: 609–619
   Google Scholar
• Wulff JC, Deeg JH, Storb R. A monoclonal antibody (DT-2) recognizing canine T lymphocytes. Transplantation 1982; 33: 616–620
   Google Scholar
• Krawiec DR, Muscoplat C HC. Development and characterization of a monoclonal antibody (Aby 6C6) that distinguishes medullary from cortical thymocytes. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 499–505
   Google Scholar
• Mukenzie JL, Fabre LW. Studies with monoclonal antibody on the distribution of thy-1 in the lymphoid and extracellular connective tissue of the dog. Transplantation 1981; 31: 275–282
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast MM, Bradstcol KF, Broomhead AF, et al. Monoclonal antibody analysis of canine hemopoietic cells: role of la-like and Thy-1 antigens in bone marrow engraftment. Trunsplantation 1986; 41: 565–571
   Google Scholar
• Mysliwietz JJ, Fezer HG, Thierfelder S, Kolb JH, Maldacker J. Recognition of two epitopes of an hemopoietic progenitors by four monoclonal antibodies. Transplantation 1988; 45: 443–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar