A Mechanical and Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Bonding by Hydroxyapatite-Coated Strain Gages

References

• Frost H. M. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage(SATMU):1. Redefining Wolff's Law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec. 1990; 226: 403–413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost H. M. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage(SATMU):2. Redefining Wolff's Law: the remodeling problem. Anat Rec. 1990; 226: 414–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter D. R. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36: S19–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch J. C. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat. 1917; 21: 177–298
   Google Scholar
• Meade J. B., Cowin S. C., Klawitter J. J., Van Buskirk WC, Skinner HB. Bone remodeling due to continuously applied loads. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36: 525–530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loitz B. J., Zernicke RF. Strenuous exercise-induced remodeling of mature bone: relationships betweenin vivo strains and bone mechanics. J Exp Biol. 1992; 170: 1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin C. T., Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984; 66A: 397–402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon L. E., Goodship A. E., Pye C. J., MacFie J. H. Mechanically adaptive bone remodeling. J Biomech. 1982; 15: 141–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamay A., Tschantz P. Mechanical influences in bone remodeling. Experimental research on Wolff's Law. J Biomech. 1972; 5: 173–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowin S. C., Lanyon L. E., Rodan G. The Kroc Foundation conference on functional adaptation in bone tissue. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36: 51–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E. L., Gilligan C. Mechanical forces and bone. Bone and Mineral Research, WQA Peck. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989; 139–173, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Goodship A. E., Lanyon L. E., MacFie H. Functional adaptation of bone to increased Stress. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979; 61 A: 539–546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon L. E. Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36: S56–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter D. R. Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. J Biomech. 1987; 20: 1095–1109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor J. A., Lanyon L. E., MacFie H. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodeling. J Biomech. 1982; 15: 767–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr D. B., Schaffler M. B., Yang K. H., Wu D. D., Lukoschek M., Kandzari K., Sivaneri N., Blaha J. D., Radin EL. The effects of altered strain environments on bone tissue kinetics. Bone. 1989; 10: 215–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T. S., Spengler DM. In vivo strain gage implantation in rats. J Biomech. 1982; 15: 911–917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szivek J. A., Johnson E. M., Magee FP. In vivo strain analysis of the greyhound femoral diaphysis. J Invest Surg. 1992; 5: 91–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurdjian E. S., Lissner HR. Mechanism of head injury as studied by the cathode ray oscilloscope preliminary report. J Neurosurg. 1944; 1: 393–399
   Google Scholar
• Caler W. E., Carter D. R., Harris WH. Techniques for implementing anin vivo bone strain gage system. J Biomech Tech Note. 1982; 14: 503–507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran GVB. Implantation of strain gages on bone. in vivo. J Biomech. 1972; 5: 119–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggot D. G., Lanyon LE. An independent 'post-mortem' calibration of electrical resistance strain gages bonded to bone surfaces. in vivo. J Biomech. 1977; 10: 615–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron J. L., Woodard S. C., Pulaski E. J., Sleeman H. K., Bandes G., Kulkarni R. K., Leonard F. The degradation of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Surgery 1965; 58: 424–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr D. B., Milgrom C., Fyhrie D., Forwood M., Nyska M., Finestone A., Saiag E., Simkin A. Humanin vivo tibial strains during vigorous activity. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1995; 20: 202
   Google Scholar
• Szivek J. A. Bioceramic coatings for artificial joint fixation. Invest Radiol. 1992; 27: 553–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas K. A., Cook S. D., Haddad RJ, Jr, Kay J. F., Jarcho M. Biologic response to hydroxylapatite-coated titanium hips: a preliminary study in dogs. J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Söballe K., Hansen E. S., Prockstedt-Rasmussen H., Pederson G. M., Bunger C. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990; 61: 299–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook S. D., Thomas A., Kay J. F., Jarcho M. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications. Clin Orthop. 1988; 232: 225–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook S. D., Thomas K. A., Kay J. F., Jarcho M. Hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium for use as an orthopedic biologic attachment system. Clin Orthop. 1988; 230: 303–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen J. A., van deWaerden JPCM, Wolke JGC, De Groot K. Histologic evaluation of the osseous adaptation to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991; 25: 973–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas K. A., Kay J. F., Cook S. D., Jarcho M. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 1395–1414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak M. M., Szivek J. A., De Young O. W., Emmanual J. Hydroxyapatite-coated strain gauges for long-termin vivo bone strain measurements. J Appl Biomater. 1993; 4: 143–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szivek J. A., Anderson P. L., Wilson D. L., De Young D. W. Technical note: development of a model for the study ofin vivo bone strains in normal and microgravity environments. J Appl Biomater. 1995; 6: 203–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baron R., Vignery A., Neff L., Silvergate A., Santa Maria A. Processing of undecalcified bone specimens for bone his-tomorphometry. Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation, R. R. Recker. CRC Press, Boca Raton 1983; 13–35
   Google Scholar
• Emmanuel J., Hornbeck C., Bloebaum RD. A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol. 1987; 62: 401–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villanueva A. R., Lundin K. A versatile new mineralized bone stain for simultaneous assessment of tetracycline and osteoid seams. Stain Technol. 1989; 64: 129–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori S., Jee WSS, Li X. I., Chan S., Kimmel DB. Effects of prostaglandin E2 on production of new cancellous bone in the axial skeleton of ovariectomized rats. Bone. 1990; 11: 103–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee WSS, Mori S., Li X. J., Chan S. Prostaglandin E2 enhances cortical bone mass and activates intracortical bone remodeling in intact and ovariectomized female rats. Bone. 1990; 11: 253–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva A. R. Histomorphometric quantitative analysis of bone. Theory and Practice of Histotechnology2d ed. Mosby C.V., St. Louis 1980; 108–117
   Google Scholar
• Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation, RR Recker. CRC Press, Boca Raton 1983
   Google Scholar
• Battraw G. A., Miera V. L., Anderson P. L., Szivek J. A. Bilateral symmetry of biomechanical properties of rat femora. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 32: 285–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman S., Aspenberg P., Song Y., Regula D., Jr, Doshi A., Lidgren L. Effects of intermittent micromotion versus polymer debris on tissue ingrowth: experiment using a micro-motion chamber implanted in rabbits. J Appl Biomater. 1994; 5: 117–123
   Google Scholar
• Hill E. L., Martin R. B., Gunther E., Morley-Holton E., Holets VR. Changes in bone in a model of spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res. 1993; 11: 537–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee WSS, Li XJ. Adaptation of cancellous bone to overloading in the adult rat: a single photon absorptionmetryand histomorphmetry study. Anat Rec. 1990; 227: 418–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jee WSS, Li X. J., Schaffler MB. Adaptation of diaphyseal structure with aging and increased mechanical usage in the adult rat: a histomorphometrical and biomechanical study. Anat Rec. 1991; 230: 332–338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simkin A., Leichter I., Swissa A., Samueloff S. The effect of swimming activity on bone architecture in growing rats. J Biomech. 1989; 22: 845–851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. J., Jee WSS, Cjow S. Y., Woodbury D. M. Adaptation of cancerous bone to aging and immobilization in the rat: a single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometry study. Anat Rec. 1990; 227: 12–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baron R., Tross R., Vignery A. Evidence of sequential remodeling in rat trabecular bone: morphology, dynamic histomorphometry, and changes during skeletal maturation. Anat Rec. 1984; 208: 137–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szivek J. A., Magee FP. A long-termin vivo bone strain measurement device. J Invest Surg. 1989; 2: 195–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar