Methodologies for the quantitative estimation of toxicant dose to cigarette smokers using physical, chemical and bioanalytical data

References

• Apiezon. (2011). Apiezon high vacuum grease properties. M&I Materials Ltd., Manchester, UK. Available from: http://www.apiezon.com/apiezon-vacuum-greases-properties-table.htm. [Last accessed: 4 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Armitage AK, Dixon M, Frost BE, et al. (2004a). The effect of tobacco blend additives on the retention of nicotine and solanesol in the human respiratory tract and on subsequent plasma nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking. Chem Res Toxicol 17:537–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage AK, Dixon M, Frost BE, et al. (2004b). The effect of inhalation volume and breath-hold duration on the retention of nicotine and solanesol in the human respiratory tract and on subsequent plasma nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 21:240–9
   Google Scholar
• Ashley DL, O'Connor RJ, Bernert JT, et al. (2010). Effect of differing levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cigarette smoke on the levels of biomarkers in smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1389–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATSDR. (1995). Toxicological profile for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp69.pdf. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Baker RR, Dixon M, Mariner DC, et al. (2004). Seminars in tobacco science. Terms used for exposure to smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 21:250
   Google Scholar
• Baker RR, Dixon M. (2006). The retention of tobacco smoke constituents in the human respiratory tract. Inhal Toxicol 17:255–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benowitz NL, Jacob P 3rd, Fong I, Gupta S. (1994). Nicotine metabolic profile in man: comparison of cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:296–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmella SG, Akerkar S, Hecht SS. (1993). Metabolites of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in smokers’ urine. Cancer Res 53:721–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmella SG, Chen M, Zhang Y, et al. (2007). Quantitation of acrolein-derived (3-hydroxypropyl)mercapturic acid in human urine by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry: effects of cigarette smoking. Chem Res Toxicol 20:986–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemspider. The free chemical database. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry. Available from: http://www.chemspider.com/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Chickos JS, Hanshaw W. (2004). Vapor pressures and vaporization enthalpies of the n-alkanes from C31 to C38 at T  =  298.15 K by correlation gas chromatography. J Chem Eng Data 49:620–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comer AK, Creighton DE. (1978). The effect of experimental conditions on smoking behaviour. In: Thornton RE (ed). Smoking behaviour. Edinburgh, London, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 76–86
   Google Scholar
• Clayton PM, Cummingham A, van Heemst JDH. (2010). Quantification of four tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cigarette filter tips using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 2:1085–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham FH, Fiebelkorn S, Meredith C. (2011). Do the aldehydes present as tobacco smoke toxicants share a common mode of action? Toxicol Lett 205:S259. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.881. [Last accessed: 9 May 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Ding YS, Chou T, Abdul-Salaam S, et al. (2012). Development of a method to estimate mouth-level benzo[a]pyrene intake by filter analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:39–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djordjevic MV, Stellman SD, Zang E. (2000). Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:106–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ESIS. European Chemical Substances Information System. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Available from: http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Feng S, Plunkett SE, Lan K, et al. (2007). A new method for estimating the retention of selected smoke constituents in the respiratory tract of smokers during cigarette smoking. Inhal Toxicol 19:169–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost BE, Mariner DC, Sinclair NM. (1988). Factors relating to nicotine physio-chemistry and retention in human smokers. Papers presented at the Meeting of the Smoke and Technology Groups, CORESTA Congress; Brighton, UK, 211–18
   Google Scholar
• Hammond D, Fong GT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. (2005). Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1370–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. (2005). Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 57:79–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP. (1994). Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 66. Ann. ICRP 24 (1–3)
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrethsen BJ. (1989). The physical properties of mainstream cigarette smoke and their relationship to deposition in the respiratory tract. In: Crapo JD, Smolko ED, Miller FJ, et al. (eds.) Chapter 12. Extrapolation of dosimetric relationships for inhaled particles and gases. New York: Academic Press, 125–41
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrethsen BJ. (2006). Numerical simulation of the effects of dilution level, depth of inhalation, and smoke composition on nicotine vapor deposition during cigarette smoking. Inhal Toxicol 18:1071–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INCHEM. International programme on chemical safety in partnership with the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Available from: http://www.inchem.org/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Karl T, Prazeller P, Mayr D, et al. (2001). Human breath isoprene and its relation to blood cholesterol levels: new measurements and modeling. J Appl Physiol 91:762–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martonen TB. (1992). Deposition patterns of cigarette smoke in human airways. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53:6–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd. (2008a). A pilot study to assess solanesol levels in exhaled cigarette smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:144–52
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd. (2008b). The influence of a humectant on the retention by humans of solanesol from cigarette smoke (Part 1, Propylene Glycol). Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:153–9
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd. (2009). The influence of a humectant on the retention by humans of solanesol from cigarette smoke (Part 2, Glycerin). Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:377–83
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd, Wilkins J. (2007). Determination of carbonyl compounds in exhaled cigarette smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 22:346–57
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd, Wilkins JM. (2008a). Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in exhaled cigarette smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:85–97
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd, Wilkins J. (2008b). Determination of hydroxybenzenes in exhaled cigarette smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:98–106
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, Coleman W 3rd, Wilkins J. (2008c). Determination of benzene and toluene in exhaled cigarette smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:107–14
   Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu SC, St. Charles FK. (2007). Differences in the chemical composition of the particulate phase of inhaled and exhaled cigarette mainstream smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 22:290–302
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery JH, Welkom LM. (1990). Groundwater chemicals desk reference. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers Inc
   Google Scholar
• Morin A, Shepperd CJ, Eldridge AC, et al. (2011). Estimation and correlation of cigarette smoke exposure in Canadian smokers as determined by filter analysis and biomarkers of exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 61:S3–12. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.020
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. International Chemistry Safety Cards. National Institute for Safety and Health. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcs/nicstart.html. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• NIST Chemistry Webbook. NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Science and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available from: http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Norton LB, Bigelow CR, Vincent WB. (1940). Partial vapor pressures from nicotine solutions at 25 °. J Am Chem Soc 62:261–4
   Google Scholar
• NRC. (1998). National Research Council. The Committee’s Framework and Criteria for Evaluation. In: Research priorities for airborne particulate matter: I. Immediate priorities and a long-range research portfolio (ISBN 030906094X). Committee on Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 34–43
   Google Scholar
• OECD SIDS. OECD Existing chemicals screening information data sets. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available from: http://oecdsids.jrc.ec.europa.eu/i5browser/Welcome.do. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Ossip-Klein DJ, Martin JE, Lomax BD, et al. (1983). Assessment of smoking topography generalization across laboratory, clinical, and naturalistic settings. Addict Behav 8:11–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankow JF, Asher WE. (2008). SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds. Atmos Chem Phys 8:2773–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips M, Herrera J, Krishnan S, et al. (1999). Variation in volatile organic compounds in the breath of normal humans. J Chromatogr B: Biomed Sci Appl 729:75–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzin GM, Wu W, Yan X, et al. (2009). Estimating smokers' mouth-level exposure to select mainstream smoke constituents from discarded cigarette filter butts. Nicotine Tob Res 11:868–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson RB. (1986). An investigation of the retention of particulate matter by cigarette smokers (Hazelton Study). BAT Technical Memorandum No. TM.86-09-010. Bates number 103526474. Available from: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jfy54a99/pdf. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Rodenstein DO, Stănescu DC. (1985). Pattern of inhalation of tobacco smoke in pipe, cigarette, and never smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 132:628–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd CJ, Eldridge AC, Mariner DC, et al. (2009). A study to estimate and correlate cigarette smoke exposure in smokers in Germany as determined by filter analysis and biomarkers of exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 55:97–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd CJ, Eldridge AC, Errington G, Dixon M. (2011). A study to evaluate the effect on mouth level exposure and biomarkers of exposure estimates of cigarette smoke exposure following a forced switch to a lower ISO tar yield cigarette. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 61:S13–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Site AD. (1997). The vapor pressure of environmentally significant organic chemicals: a review of methods and data at ambient temperature. J Phys Chem Ref Data 26:157–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRC. Chemfate, PhysProp, and 2009 databases. Syracuse, NY: SRC Inc. Available from: http://www.srcinc.com/what-we-do/free-demos.aspx. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• St. Charles FK, Krautter GR, Dixon M, Mariner DC. (2006). A comparison of nicotine dose estimates in smokers between filter analysis, salivary cotinine, and urinary excretion of nicotine metabolites. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 189:345–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Charles FK, Krautter GR, Mariner DC. (2009a). Post-puff respiration measures on smokers of different tar yield cigarettes. Inhal Toxicol 21:712–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Charles FK, Ashley M, Shepperd CJ, et al. (2009b). A robust method for estimating human smoked cigarette yields from filter analysis data. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 23:232–43
   Google Scholar
• Tatavarti AS, Dollimore D, Alexander KS. (2002). A thermogravimetric analysis of non-polymeric pharmaceutical plasticizers: kinetic analysis, method validation, and thermal stability evaluation. AAPS PharmSci 4:231–42. DOI: 10.1208/ps040445
   Google Scholar
• TOXNET. ChemIDplus and Hazardous Substances Data Bank. Toxicology Data Network. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• The Good Scents Company. Oak Creek, WI. Available from: http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/. [Last accessed: 1 Dec 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Tricker AR. (2006). Biomarkers derived from nicotine and its metabolites: a review. Beitr Tabakforsch Int 22:147–75
   Google Scholar
• Urban HJ, Tricker AR, Leyden DE, et al. (2012). Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 8: nicotine bridging – estimating smoke constituent exposure by their relationships to both nicotine levels in mainstream cigarette smoke and in smokers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 64:S85–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman G, Newman SP, Pavia D, Clarke SW. (1986). Inhaled smoke volume, puffing indices and carbon monoxide uptake in asymptomatic cigarette smokers. Clin Sci 71:421–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki – recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the: 29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975; 35th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983; 41st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989; 48th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996; 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000; 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, 2002 (Note of Clarification on paragraph 29 added); 55th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, 2004 (Note of Clarification on Paragraph 30 added); 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, October 2008
   Google Scholar