Can Human Amblyopia be Treated in Adulthood?

REFERENCES

• Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:1003–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes GR, Hess RF, Dumoulin SO, Achtman RL, Pike GB. The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia. J Physiol (Lond). 2001;533:281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:1041–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiorpes L, McKee SP. Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:480–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Bradley A, McGraw PV. Understanding the neural basis of amblyopia. Neuroscientist. 2004;10:106–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Dumoulin SO, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1575–1591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley M J, Neufeld M, McCarry B, et al. Remediation of refractive amblyopia by optical correction alone. Ophthal Phys Opt. 2002;22:296–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaegen Taylor, D. Critical period for deprivation amblyopia in children. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99:432–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awaya S, Sugawara M, Miyake S. Observations in patients with occlusion amblyopia: results of treatment. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99:447–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Smith EL, Crawford ML, von Noorden GK. Behavioral studies of the sensitive periods of development of visual functions in monkeys. Behav Brain Res. 1990;41:179–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Noorden GK. New clinical aspects of stimulus deprivation amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92:416–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Stager DR. The critical period for surgical treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1532–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Swanson WH, Stager DR, et al. Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3687–3699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugelberg U. Visual acuity following treatment of bilateral congenital cataracts. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;82:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks MM. Visual results in aphakic children. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL, et al. Behavioral studies of stimulus deprivation amblyopia in monkeys. Vision Res. 1981;21:779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlin JD, Flynn JT. Therapy of anisometropic amblyopia. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab. 1981;18:47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL, Hung L-F, Harwerth RS. The degree of image degradation and the depth of amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3775–3781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL, Harwerth RS, Crawford ML. Spatial contrast sensitivity deficits in monkeys produced by optically induced anisometropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, et al. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up from randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;324:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Wright CM. The emotional impact of amblyopia treatment in preschool children: randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koklanis K, Abel LA, Aroni R. Psychosocial impact of amblyopia and its treatment: a multidisciplinary study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:743–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley-Nolan A, McCann A, O’Keefe M. Atropine penalisation versus occlusion as the primary treatment for amblyopia. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:54–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder AR, Irwin M, Auld R, et al. Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:585–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan M, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I. A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1435–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon SE, Polling, J-R, Simonsz B, et al. (2004). Objective survey of the prescription of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:736–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, et al. Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the monitored occlusion treatment of amblyopia study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3048–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1632–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MP, Wright CM, Hrisos S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening. BMJ. 2003;327:1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Hunter DG. Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH, Koslowe K, Sanet R. Success in ambylopia therapy as a function of age: a literature survey. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;54:269–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kupfer C. Treatment of amblyopia exanopsia in adults; a preliminary report of seven cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 1957;43:918–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Neumann R, Chaimovitch Y, et al. Compliance and results of treatment for amblyopia in children more than 8 years old. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;102:340–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KH, Hwang JM, Ahn JK. Efficacy of amblyopia therapy initiated after 9 years of age. Eye. 2004;18:571–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck, RW, et al. (2005). Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selenow A, Ciuffreda KJ. Vision function recovery during orthoptic therapy in an exotropic amblyope with high unilateral myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60:659–666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selenow A, Ciuffreda KJ. Vision function recovery during orthoptic therapy in an adult esotropic amblyope. J Am Optom Assoc. 1986;57:132–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, McGraw PV, et al. Functional visual loss in amblyopia and the effect of occlusion therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2859–2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven CH, Kenneth JC. Different rates and amounts of vision function recovery during orthoptic therapy in an older strabismic amblyope. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1986;6:213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick B, Wingard M, Cotter S, et al. Anisometropic amblyopia: is the patient ever too old to treat? Optom Vision Sci 1992;69:866–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Mallah MK, Chakravarthy U, Hart PM. Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent? Brit J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:952–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengpiel F. The critical period. Curr Biol. 2007;17:R742–R743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonomano, DV, Merzenich, MM. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:149–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahle M, Morgan M. No transfer of perceptual learning between similar stimuli in the same retinal position. Curr Biol. 1996;6:292–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio T, Fahle M, Edelman S. Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science. 1992;256:1018–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen J, Levi DM. Perceptual learning in vernier acuity: what is learned? Vision Res. 1995;35:519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentini A, Berardi N. Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency. Nature. 1980;287:43–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine I, Jacobs RA. Comparing perceptual learning tasks: A review. J Vis. 2002;2:190–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu LP, Pashler H. Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set. Percept Psychophys. 1992;52:582–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole AJ, Kersten DJ. Learning to see random-dot stereograms. Perception. 1992;21:227–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao L-Q, Zhang J-Y, Wang R, et al. (2008). Complete transfer of perceptual learning across retinal locations enabled by double training. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1922–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Zhou Y, Lu ZL. Broad bandwidth of perceptual learning in the visual system of adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:4068–4073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM. Perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia: A reevaluation of critical periods in human vision. Dev Psychobiol. 2005;46:222–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6692–6697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Huang C, Xu P, et al. Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Vision Res. 2006;46:739–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Levi DM. Characterizing the mechanisms of improvement for position discrimination in adult amblyopia. J Vis. 2004;4:476–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Provost A, Levi DM. Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5046–5051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Li RW. Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2009;364:399–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Li RW. Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: A mini-review. Vision Res. 2009;49:2535–2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert CD, Sigman M, Crist RE. The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron. 2001;31:681–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis. 2003;3:380–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astle AT, Webb BS, McGraw PV. The pattern of learned visual improvements in adult amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011, in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astle A, McGraw PV, Webb BS. Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in adults with amblyopia. BMJ Case Reports. 2011; doi:10.1136/bcr.07.2010.3143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peirce JW. PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;162:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:529–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball K, Sekuler R. Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination. Vision Res 1987;27:953–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoups A, Orban G. Interocular transfer in perceptual learning of a pop-out discrimination task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:7358–7362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahle M. Human pattern recognition: parallel processing and perceptual learning. Perception. 1994;23:411–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu ZL, Chu W, Dosher BA, Lee S. Perceptual learning of Gabor orientation identification in visual periphery: Complete inter-ocular transfer of learning mechanisms. Vision Res. 2005;45:2500–2510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Ledgeway T, Hess RF, McGraw PV. Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Res. 2003;43:729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaschi DE, Regan D, Kraft SP, Hong XH. Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2483–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raasch TW, Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesemann W. Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2002;219:660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi A, Cagenello R. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:422–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A. The Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10:21–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahle M, Henke-Fahle S. Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(5):869–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Polat U, Hu YS. Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia. Practice makes better. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38(8):1493–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahissar M, Hochstein S. Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature. 1997;387:401–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeter PE, Dosher BAPetrov A & Lu ZL, . Task precision at transfer determines specificity of perceptual learning. J Vis. 2009;5(3).
   Google Scholar
• Fronius M, Cirina L, Cordey A, et al. Visual improvement during psychophysical training in an adult amblyopic eye following visual loss in the contralateral eye. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:278–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscox F, Strong N, Thompson JR, Minshull C, Woodruff G. Occlusion for amblyopia: a comprehensive survey of outcome. Eye. 1992;6(Pt 3):300–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR. Defining and measuring treatment outcome in unilateral amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1229–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Klein SA, Levi DM. Prolonged perceptual learning of positional acuity in adult amblyopia: perceptual template retuning dynamics. J Neurosci. 2008;28:14223–14229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astle AT, Webb BS, McGraw PV. Spatial frequency discrimination learning in normal and developmentally impaired human vision. Vision Res. 2010;50:2445–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Ngo C and Levi DM. Video game play induces plasticity in the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biology. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt CS. Why is the adult amblyopic eye unstable? Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1105–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddingham PE, Butler TKH, Cobb SV, et al. Preliminary results from the use of the novel Interactive Binocular Treatment (I-BiT) system, in the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Eye. 2005;20:375–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar