Amblyopia and Real-World Visuomotor Tasks

REFERENCES

• Anderson SA, Swettenham JB. Neuroimaging in human amblyopia. Strabismus. 2006;14:21–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer A, Dietz K, Kolling G, Hart W, Schiefer U. The relevance of stereopsis for motorists: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett SJ, van der Kamp J, Savelsburgh GJP, Davids K. Discriminating the role of binocular information in the timing of one-handed catch. The effects of telestereoscopic viewing and ball size. Exp Brain Res. 2000;135:341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R. Accommodation, occlusion, and disaprity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27:1314–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IR, Simpson PJ. Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spatial Vis. 2004;17:95–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckley JG, Panesar GK, MacLellan MJ, Pacey IE, Barrett BT. Changes to the control of adaptive gait in individuals with long-standing reduced stereoacuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2487–2495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming BG. The relationship between stereoacuity and stereomotion thresholds. Perception. 1995;24:105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder AR. Amblyopia and Disability. In: Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, eds. Amblyopia: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002:105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Godber G. Living with one eye. BMJ. 1987;295:1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ, Finlay AL. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1139–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF. Sensory processing in human amblyopia: snakes and ladders. In: Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, eds. Amblyopia: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002;19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Kelly T, Henderson J, Wright CM. Unilateral visual impairment and neurodevelopmental performance in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:836–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel GL, Grattan PE, Bedell HE. Are the dominant eyes of amblyopes normal? Am J Optom Physiol Optics. 1980;57:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanonidou E, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I. Reading strategies in mild to moderate strabismic amblyopia: an eye movement investigation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3502–3508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoula Z, Bucci MP, Eggert T, Garraud L. Impairment of the binocular coordination of saccades in strabismus. Vision Res. 1997;37:2757–2766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe BD, Watt SJ. The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results. Exp Brain Res. 2009;194:435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitaoji H, Toyama K. Preservation of position and motion stereopsis in strabismic subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:1260–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill DC. Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vision. 2005;5:103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-L, Crabtree CE, Norman JF, Bingham GP. Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided on line. Percept Psychophys. 2008;70:1032–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir M, Musch E, La Grange N. Ecological relevance of stereopsis in one-handed ball-catching. Percept Motor Skills. 1999;89:495–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner Y, Pianka P, Azmon B, Leiba H, Stolovitch C, Loewenstein A. Area-specific amblyopic effects in human occipitotemporal object representations. Neuron. 2003;40:1023–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Klein SA. Vernier acuity, crowding, and amblyopia. Vision Res. 1985;25:979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Song S, Pelli DG. Amblyopic reading is crowded. J Vision. 2007;7:2111–2117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Mullen KT, Thompson B, Hess RF. Effective connectivity anomalies in human amblyopia. Neuroimage. 2011;54:506–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maag U, Vanasse C, Dionne G, Laberge-Nadeau C. Taxi drivers’ accidents: how binocular vision problems are related to their rate and severity in terms of the number of victims. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29:217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Delaey C, Savelsbergh GJ. Stereo vision enhances learning of a catching skill. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179:723–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Savelsbergh GJ. The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157:383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Morgan MJ, Grant S. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3711–3720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melmoth DR, Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2006;171:371–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:283–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendola JD, Conner IP, Roy A, Chan S-T, Schwartz TL, Odom JP, Kwong KK. Voxel-based analysis of MRI detects abnormal visual cortex in children and adults with amblyopia. Human Brain Mapping. 2005;25:222–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner AD, Goodale MA. Two visual systems re-reviewed. Neuropsychologica. 2008;46:774–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman HC. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128:578–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muckli L, Kiess S, Tonhausen N, Singer W, Goebel R, Sireteanu R. Cerebral correlates of impaired grating perception in individual, psychophysically assessed human amblyopes. Vision Res. 2006;46:506–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Goltz H, Chandrakumar M, Hirji ZA, Wong AM. Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behaviour: I. Saccadic eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6348–6354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H. The functional significance of stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2019–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenrick P, Sasndstedt P, Lennerstrand G. Postural sway and gait of children with convergent strabismus. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:495–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips CI. Personal view. BMJ. 1987;295:1133.
   Google Scholar
• Simons HD, Gassler PA. Vision anomalies and reading skill: a meta-analysis of the literature. Am J Optom Physiol Optics. 1988;65:893–904.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snowdon S, Stewart-Brown S. Preschool Vision Screening: Results of a Systematic Review. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Report No. 9, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Stifter E, Burggasser G, Hirmann E, Thaler A, Radner W. Monocular and binocular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1324–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttle CM, Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Sloper JJ, Grant S. (2011) Eye-hand coodination skills in children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1851–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijtgat P, Mazyn L, De Laey C, Lenior M. The contribution of stere vision to the control of braking. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:719–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Grol MJ, Toni I. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. J Neurosci. 2008;28:4726–4735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:594–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan X, Lin X, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Song S, Jiang T. Dorsal visual pathway changes in patients with comitant exotropia. PloS One. 2010;3:5e10931.
   Google Scholar