References
- Kaufman L. On the spread of suppression and binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1963; 3: 401–315
- Fukuda H, Blake R. Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. J Exp Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 1992; 18: 362–370
- Flom M C, Heath G G, Takahashi E. Contour interaction and visual resolution: contralateral effects. Science 1963; 142: 979–980
- Fukuda H, Kani K, Okamoto Y. Binocular interactions as a function of retinal disparity. Human Information Processing: Measures. Mechanisms, and Models, D Vickers, P L Smith. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989; 31–41
- Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision. J Physiol 1965; 181: 881–894
- Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in human cone vision. J Physiol 1967; 190: 139–154
- Fiorentini A, Bayly E, Maffei L. Peripheral and central contributions to psychophysical spatial interactions. Vision Res 1972; 12: 253–259
- Sturr J F, Teller D Y. Sensitization by annular surrounds: dichoptic properties. Vision Res 1973; 13: 909–918
- Johnson C A, Enoch J M. Human psychophysical analysis of receptive field‐like properties‐II. Dichoptic properties of the Westheimer function. Vision Res 1976; 16: 1455–1462
- Levi D M, Harwerth R S. Spatio‐temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 90–95
- Schor C. Visual stimuli for strabismic suppression. Perception 1977; 6: 583–593
- Sireteanu R, Fronius M. Nasotemporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: Consequence of long‐term interocular suppression. Vision Res 1981; 21: 1055–1063
- Sireteanu R, Fronius M, Singer W. Binocular interactions in the peripheral visual field of humans with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Vision Res 1981; 21: 1065–1074
- Sireteanu R. Binocular vision in strabismic humans with alternating fixation. Vision Res 1982; 22: 889–896
- Fahle M. Non‐fusable stimuli and the role of binocular inhibition in normal and pathologic vision, especially strabismus. Doc Ophthalmol 1983; 55: 323–340
- Smith E L, Levi D M, Manny R E, Harwerth R S, White J M. The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 80–87
- Kitaoji H, Toyama K. Preservation of position and motion stereopsis in strabismic subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1260–1267
- Sireteanu R, Fronius M. Different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of strabismics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 2023–2033
- Holopigian K. Clinical suppression and binocular rivalry suppression: the effects of stimulus strength on the depth of suppression. Vision Res 1989; 29: 1325–1333
- Leonards U, Sireteanu R. Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters. Perception & Psychophysics 1993; 54: 65–74
- Freeman A W, Jolly N. Visual loss during interocular suppression in normal and strabismic subjects. Vision Res 1994; 34: 2043–2050
- Taylor M M, Creelman C D. PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust SOC Am 1967; 41: 782–787
- Kato H, Bishop P O, Orban G A. Binocular interaction on monocularly discharged lateral geniculate and striate neurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 932–951
- Henry G H, Bishop P O, Coombs J S. Inhibitory and subliminal excitatory receptive fields of simple units in cat striate cortex. Vision Res 1969; 9: 1289–1296
- Blake R, Camisa J. On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. J Exp Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 1979; 5: 315–323
- Orban G A. Studies of Brain function II: Neuronal Operations in the Visual Cortex. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1984
- Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Review 1989; 96: 145–167