A comparison between different contrast sensitivity tests in the detection of amblyopia

References

• Van Noorden G K. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. Theory and Management of Strabismus. 5th ed.. The CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1996; 216
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg A, Kirchhofer M L. Visual acuity in amblyopia: A comparison betweeen preferential looking and conventional tests. “Orthoptic Horizons”. Trans 6th Int Orthoptic Congress. 1987; 81–7
   Google Scholar
• Katz B, Sireteanu R. The Teller Acuity Card test: A useful method for clinical routine?. Clin Vision Sci 1990; 5(4)307–23
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg A. Assessment of visual acuity in adult patients with strabismic amblyopia: A comparison between the preferential looking method and different acuity charts. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1997, (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda K, Levi D, Selenow A. Amblyopia. Basic and clinical aspects. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1991; 10–5
   Google Scholar
• Bodis Wollner I. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with cerebral lesions. Science 1972; 178: 769–71
   Google Scholar
• Arden G B, Jacobsen J. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate values for screening in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 23–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D, Silver R, Murray T J. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis-hidden visual loss. Brain 1977; 100: 563–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisén L, Sjöstrand J. Contrast sensitivity in optic neuritis: A preliminary report. Doc Ophthalmol Proc 1978; Ser 17: 165–74
   Google Scholar
• Wolkstein M, Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I. Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology 1980; 87(11)1140–9
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen L, Laurinen P, Rovamo J. Contrast sensitivity in evaluation of visual impairment due to diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1983; 61: 94–101
   Google Scholar
• Hess R F, Woo G. Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 428–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess R F, Howell E R. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1049–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstrand J. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: A preliminary report. J Metab Ophthalmol 1978; 2: 135–7
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstrand J. Contrast sensitivity in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. A study of the effect of treatment. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1981; 59: 25–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennerstrand G, Lundh B. Improvement of contrast sensitivity from treatment for amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1980; 58: 292–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh B, Lennerstrand G. Effects of amblyopia therapy on contrast sensitivity as reflected in the visuogram. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1983; 61: 431–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson M, Sjöstrand J. Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationship in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 44–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo G C, Dalziel C C. A pilot study of contrast sensitivity assessment of the CAM treatment of amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1981; 59: 35–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela P U, Alanko H. Correlations between visual acuity and grating acuity, and contrast sensitivity in amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1990; 68: 91–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers G L, Bremer D L, Leguire L E. The contrast sensitivity function and childhood amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 104: 64–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntyjärvi M I, Autere M H, Silvennoinen A M, Myöhänen T. Observations on the use of three different contrast sensitivity tests in children and young adults. J Pediat Ophthalmol Strabismus 1989; 26(3)113–9
   Google Scholar
• Brown V A, Woodhouse J M. Assessment of techniques for measuring contrast sensitivity in children. Ophthalm Physiol Optics 1986; 6(2)165–70
   Google Scholar
• Corwin T R, Richman J E. Three clinical tests of the spatial contrast sensitivity function: A comparison. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1986; 63(6)413–8
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen L, Moitanen I, Rovamo J, Näsänen R. Clinical assessment of contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1990; 68(Suppl. 195)83–9
   Google Scholar
• Koskela P U. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia I. Changes during CAM treatment. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1986; 64: 344–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koskela P U. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia II. Changes during pieoptic treatment. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1986; 64: 563–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela P U, Hyvärinen L. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia III. Effect of occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1986; 64: 386–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela P U, Hyvärinen L. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia IV. Assessment of vision using vertical and horizontal gratings and optotypes at different contrast levels. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1986; 64: 570–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown V A, Doran M L, Woodhouse J M. The use of computerized contrast sensitivity, Arden gratings and Low contrast letter charts in the assessment of amblyopia. Ophthalm Physiol Optics 1987; 7(1)43–51
   Google Scholar
• Glover H, Bird S, Yap M. Performance of amblyopic children on printed contrast sensitivity test charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1987; 64(5)361–6
   Google Scholar
• Leguire L E, Rogers G L, Bremer D L. Amblyopia. The normal eye is not normal. J Pediat Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990; 27(1)32–9
   Google Scholar
• Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Reese D, Brown B. Low contrast letter acuity in childhood amblyopia. Clin Vision Sci 1990; 5(3)243–7
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Rydberg A, Lennerstrand G. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: A comparison between different contrast sensitivity tests for the detection of amblyopia. Trans 21st Meeting ESA, Salzburg, 1993. 315–20
   Google Scholar
• Hedin A, Olsson K. Letter legibility and the construction of a New Visual Acuity Chart. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 1984; 189: 147–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg A P. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1984; 61: 403–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cadwell 7400 Operator's Manual, 1984. Cadwell Laboratories Inc, 1021 North Kellogg Street, Kennewick, WA 99336.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins A J, Delia Sala S, Somazzi L, Nimmo Smith I. Age related norms for the Cambridge Low Contrast Gratings, including details concerning their design and use. Clin Vision Sci 1988; 2(3)201–12
   Google Scholar
• Regan D, Neima D. Low contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 1192–1200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Low contrast visual acuity test for pediatric use. Can J Ophthalmol 1988; 23(5)224–7
   Google Scholar
• Pelli D G, Robson J G, Wilkins A J. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vision Sci 1988; 2(3)187–99
   Google Scholar
• Campbell F, Green D. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181: 576–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derefeltd G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B. Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh) 1979; 57: 679–90
   Google Scholar
• Howell E R, Mitchell D E, Keith C G. Contrast thresholds for sine wave gratings of children with amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 782–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virsu V, Lehtio P, Rovamo J. Contrast sensitivity in normal and pathological vision. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981; 30: 263–72
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Braddick O, Moar K. Development of contrast sensitivity over the first three months of life in the human infant. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1037–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, French J, Braddick O. Contrast sensitivity function in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 525–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyvärinen L. Vision Testing Manual, Contrast sensitivity, Precision Vision, Villa Park, IL 60181, USA 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner H, Behrens-Baumann W. Untersuchungen zur Kontrastempfindlichkeit von Sehbehinderten. Ophthalmologe 1995; 92: 137–41
   Google Scholar