Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ophthalmic Epidemiology Volume 16, 2009 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
181
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Assessment of the Student Sight Savers Program Methods for Glaucoma Screening

Sarwat SalimHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
,
Peter A. NetlandHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
,
Kenneth H. FungHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
,
Mary E. SmithHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
&
Amanda AldridgeHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Pages 238-242 | Received 17 Oct 2008, Accepted 29 Jan 2009, Published online: 29 Oct 2009

REFERENCES

  • Packer H, Deutsch AR, Deweese MW, Efficiency of screening tests for glaucoma?. JAMA. 1965;192:109–112.
  • Quigley HA. Current and future approaches to glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:210–220.
  • Shields MB. The challenge of screening for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:793–795.
  • American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. San Francisco: AAO, 2005. Accessed September 19, 2008, from: www.aao.org/ppp.
  • Mundorf TK, Zimmerman TJ, Nardin GF, Automated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:505–508.
  • Sommer A. Glaucoma risk factors observed in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996;7:93–98.
  • Leske MC, Connell AMS, Wu SY, Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:918–924.
  • Leu M, Czene K, Reilly M. The impact of truncation and missing family links in population-based registers on familial risk estimates. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1461–1467.
  • Sponsel WE. Tonometry in question: Can visual screening tests play a more decisive role in glaucoma diagnosis and management?. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33:291–300.
  • Gottlieb LK, Schwartz B, Pauker SG, Glaucoma screening. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983;28:206–226.
  • Tuck MW, Crick RP. The cost-effectiveness of various modes of screening for primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997;4:3–17.
  • Vistamehr S, Shelsta HN, Palmisano PC, Glaucoma screening in a high-risk population. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:534–540.
  • Kumar S, Middlemiss C, Bulsara M, Telemedicine-friendly, portable tonometers: An evaluation for intraocular pressure screening. Clin Exper Ophthalmol. 2006;34:666–670.
  • Nduaguba C, Lee RK. Glaucoma screening: Current trends, economic issues, technology, and challenges. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:142–152.
  • Ralston ME, Choplin NT, Hollenbach KA, Glaucoma screening in primary care: The role of noncontact tonometry. J Fam Pract. 1992;120:699–708.
  • Moshfeghi DM, Smith ME, Netland PA. Ocular hypertension and early primary open-angle glaucoma. Comp Ophthalmol Update. 2000;3:135–145.
  • Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2003;16:213–225.
  • Robin TA, Muller A, Rait J, Performance of community-based glaucoma screening using frequency doubling technology and Heidelberg retinal tomography. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12:167–178.
  • Thomas R, Bhat S, Muliyil JP, Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:46–50.
  • Iwasaki A, Sugita M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:529–537.
  • Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819–829.
  • Cioffi GA, Mansberger S, Spry P, Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Tr Am Ophth Soc. 2000;98:195–202.
  • Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Predictive value of frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting glaucoma in a developing country. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:128–134.
  • Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma. The Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2005;114:27–32.
  • Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA, Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314–322.
  • Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:699–708.
  • Stamper RL. Editorial: Glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:149–150.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.