REFERENCES
- Buch H, Nielsen N, Vinding T, 14-year Incidence, progression, and visual morbidity of age related maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:787–798.
- Klein BE, Tomany SC, Meuer SM, Ten year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1767–1779.
- Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1450–1460.
- Van Newkirk MR, Nanjan MB, Wang JJ, The prevalence of age-related maculopathy: The Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1593–1600.
- Hammond CJ, Webster AR, Snieder H, genetic influence on early age-related maculopathy. A twin study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:730–736.
- Thornton J, Edwards R, Mitchell P, Smoking and age-related macular degeneration: A review of association. Eye. 2005;19:935–944.
- Klein R, Meuer S, Moss S, Detection of age related macular degeneration using a nonmydriatic digital camera and a standard film fundus camera. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1642–1646.
- Hansen AB, Sander B, Larsen M, Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital nonmydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo color transparencies. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand 2004;82:656–665.
- Giles G. The melbourne study of diet and cancer. Proc Nutr Soc Aust. 1990;15:61–68.
- Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39:367–374.
- Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, The Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1128–1134.
- Landis JR, Koch GC. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
- Redmer van Leeuwen R, Chakravarthy U, Vingerling JR, Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: s digital imaging as good as 35-mm film?. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1540–1544.
- Nilanjana Deb-Joardar, Natacha Germain, Gilles Thuret, Screening for diabetes retinopathy by ophthalmologist and endocrinologist with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:814–821.
- Heaven C, Cansfield J, Shaw KM. The quality of photographs produced by the non-mydriatic fundus camera in a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy; a 1-year prospective study. Eye. 1993;7:787–790.
- Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, A comparison of digital retinal image quality among the photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004;11:191–197.
- Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:920–924.
- Porter G, Hood B M, Troscianko T, Females, but not males, show greater pupillary response to direct- than deviated-gaze faces. Perception. 2006;35:1129–1136.