Relationships in Glaucoma Patients Between Standard Vision Tests, Quality of Life, and Ability to Perform Daily Activities

REFERENCES

• Brown GC. Vision and quality-of-life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:473–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105(3):413–420.
   Google Scholar
• Poser S, Bornstein BH, McGorty EK. Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box. Law Hum Behav. 2003;27(1):53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Baus S. Psychological aspects of visual impairment. Br J Vis Impair. 1999;17:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Duberstein PR, Sorensen S, Lyness JM, et al. Personality is associated with perceived health and functional status in older primary care patients. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(1):25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G Jr. Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(12):2259–2264.
   Google Scholar
• Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, et al. Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(2):154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(5):858–864.
   Google Scholar
• West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Compensatory strategy use identifies risk of incident disability for the visually impaired. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(9):1242–1247.
   Google Scholar
• West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, et al. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):774–780.
   Google Scholar
• Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–M94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Fishman GA, et al. Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(1):65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane ME, et al. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to visual function in older adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2001 May;78(5):350–359.
   Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Arditi A, Coffey B, et al. Self report in functional assessment of low vision. J Vis Imp Blind. 1990;84:61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis C, Lovie-Kitchin J, Thompson B. Psychosocial adjustment to age-related macular degeneration. J Vis Imp Blind. 1995;89:16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux EL, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The determinants of participation in activities of daily living in people with impaired vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(2):265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzana L, Lankaranian D, Dugar J, et al. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods, and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009 Mar–Apr;16(2):107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(1):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• West SK, Rubin GS, Munoz B, et al. Assessing functional status: correlation between performance on tasks conducted in a clinic setting and performance on the same task conducted at home. The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997;52(4):M209–M217.
   Google Scholar
• Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioli J. Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:589–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jampel HD. Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:301–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, et al. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(7):991–997.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181–185; discussion 185–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(6):758–763.
   Google Scholar
• Hodapp E, Parrish II R, Anderson D. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1993:52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050–1058.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(2):422–432.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, et al. Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117(4):450–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guralnik JM, Branch LG, Cummings SR, Curb JD. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol. 1989;44(5):M141–M146.
   Google Scholar
• Lamoureux EL, Ferraro JG, Pallant JF, et al. Are standard instruments valid for the assessment of quality of life and symptoms in glaucoma? Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):789–796.
   Google Scholar
• Kempen GI, van Heuvelen MJ, van den Brink RH, et al. Factors affecting contrasting results between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitation. Age Ageing. 1996;25(6):458–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam JT, Graney MJ, Beaver T, et al. Comparison of subjective ratings of function with observed functional ability of frail older persons. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(9):1127–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian A, Dickinson C. Spatial localization in visual impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(1):78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fried LP, Herdman SJ, Kuhn KE, et al. Preclinical disability: hypotheses about the bottom of the iceberg. J Aging Health. 1991;3(2):285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Massof RW, Hsu CT, Baker FH, et al. Visual disability variables. II: The difficulty of tasks for a sample of low-vision patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(5):954–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang GH, et al. The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Safran AB, Landis T. From cortical plasticity to unawareness of visual field defects. J Neuroophthalmol. 1999;19(2):84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zandi M, Adib-Hajbagheri M, Memarian R, et al. Effects of a self-care program on quality of life of cirrhotic patients referring to Tehran Hepatitis Center. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:35.
   Google Scholar