Structural Equation Modeling: A Framework for Ocular and Other Medical Sciences Research

References

• Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Duncan OD, Goldberger AS, Social Science Research Council (U.S.), University of Wisconsin. Social Systems Research Institute. Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press; 1973
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW. Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of the covariance structures. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1984;37:62–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociolog Meth Res 1992;21:205–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén BO. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent indicators. Psychometrika 1984;49:115–132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika 2004;69:167–190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN, Madow WG. Sampling survey methods and theory. New York: Wiley; 1953
   Google Scholar
• Binder D. On the variance of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. Int Stat Rev 1983;51:279–292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 3nd ed. London: Arnold; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ. Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. J Educ Behav Stat 2003;28:135–167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan D. Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. Vol 10. 2nd ed: London: Sage; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3nd ed: New York: The Guilford Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. A first course in structural equation modeling. 2nd ed: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1969;34:183–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman C. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 1904;15:201–292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock HM. Making causal inferences for unmeasured variables from correlations among indicators. Am J Sociol 1963;69:53–62
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon AL. Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Rigdon EE. Demonstrating the effects of unmodeled random measurement error. Struct Equation Model 1994;1:375–380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 1904;15:72–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. Indicator methodology. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Mayer MJ, Dougherty RF, Hu L. A covariance structure analysis of flicker sensitivity. Vision Res 1995;35:1575–1583
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, et al. The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch Analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(6):2529–2534
   Google Scholar
• Marella M, Pesudovs K, Keeffe JE, et al. The psychometric validity of the NEI VFQ-25 for use in a low-vision population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2878–2884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Hawthorne G, Richardson J, et al. Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4007–4015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger AS. Structural equation methods in the social sciences. Econometrica 1972;40:979–1001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. Correlation and causation. J Agricult Res 1921;20:557–585
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. The method of path coefficients. Ann Math Stat 1934;5(3):161–215
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. Path coefficients and path regression: alternative or complementary concepts? Biometrics 1960;16:189–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwin DF, Hauser RM. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. Am Sociolog Rev 1975;40:37–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Brown RL. Assessing specific mediational effects in complex theoretical models. Struct Equation Model 1997;4:142–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psycholog Meth 2002;7:83–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Arch Ophthalmol Jul 2001;119(7):1050–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestra P, Varadharajan-Krishnakumar J. Full Information estimations of a system of simultaneous equations with error component structure. Econometric Theory 1987;3:223–246
   Google Scholar
• Greene WH. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2002;54(1):193–200
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 2007;58:593–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1991
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Res 2007;42:185–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Paxton PM. Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Struct Equation Model 1998;5:267–293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Marcoulides GA. Interaction and non-linear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Davidov E, Breitscheidel L, Clouth J, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and health-related quality of life. Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Feb 2009;247:267–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan AG, Mitchell P, Burlutsky G, et al. Retinal vessel caliber and the long-term incidence of age-related cataract: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology Oct 2008;115(1):1693–1698
   Google Scholar
• Scialfa CT, Kline DW, Wood PK. Structural modeling of contrast sensitivity in adulthood. J Opt Soc Am A Jan 2002;19(1):158–165
   Google Scholar
• Pearl J. Causal inference in statistics: an overview. Statistic Surv 2009;3:96–146
   Google Scholar
• Pearl J. The causal foundations of structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of structural equation modeling. Hoyle RH, ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012. pp 68–91
   Google Scholar
• Finkel S. Causal analysis with panel data. London: Sage; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle JL. Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable models. Psychometrika 1996;61:109–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Kirby JB, Curran PJ, et al. Latent variable models under misspecification: two stage least squares (2SLS) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators. Sociol Meth Res 2007;36:46–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980;88:588–606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull Mar 1990;107(2):238–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Long JS. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Balla JW, Hau K. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. Structural equation modeling: categorical variables. New York: Wiley; 2005
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716–723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz GE. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 1978;6:461–464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Reliable estimation of generalized linear mixed models using adaptive quadrature. Stata J 2002;2:1–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. J Econometrics 2005;128:301–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B, Sivaganesan S, Succop P, Goodman E. Statistical assessment of meditational effects for logistic mediation models. Statist Med 2004;23:2713–2728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Estimation of the mediation effect with a binary mediator. Statist Med Aug 15 2007;26(18):3398–3414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ SL, Lee DJ, Lam BL, et al. Assessment of the effect of visual impairment on mortality through multiple health pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Aug 2008;49:3318–3323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpa MJ, Mitchell P, Beath K, et al. Direct and indirect effects of visual impairment on mortality risk in older persons: the Blue Mountain Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol Oct 2009;127(10):1347–1353
   Google Scholar
• Lam BL, Christ SL, Lee DJ, et al. Reported visual impairment and risk of suicide: The 1986–1996 National Health Interview Survey. Arch Ophthalmol Jul 2008;126(7):975–980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Bauer DJ, Christ SL, Edwards MC. An overview of structural equation models and recent extensions. New York: Wiley; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Lam BL, Christ SL, Zheng DD, et al. Longitudinal relationships among visual acuity and tasks of everyday life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54(1):193–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale CM, Cardon LR, North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Scientific Affairs Division. Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Plomin R. Behavioral genetics. 4th ed. New York: Worth Publishers; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Purcell S. Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res Dec 2002;5:554–571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toh T, Liew SHM, MacKinnon JR, et al. Central corneal thickness is highly heritable: the twin eye studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Oct 2005;46:3718–3722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Hewitt AW, Ruddle JB, et al. Genetic dissection of myopia: evidence for linkage of ocular axial length to chromosome 5q. Ophthalmology Jun 2008;115(6):1053–1057 e1052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taarnhøj NCBB, Larsen M, Sander B, et al. Heritability of retinal vessel diameters and blood pressure: a twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3539–3544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes MC, Andrew T, Carbonaro F, et al. Estimating heritability and shared environmental effects for refractive error in twin and family studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:126–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey P, Mitchell P, Gilbert CE, et al. The inheritance of peripapillary atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(6):2529–2534
   Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Shekar SN, Baird PN. The role of educational attainment in refraction: the genes in myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Feb 2008;49(2):534–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfilippo PG, Hewitt AW, Hammond CJ, Mackey DA. The heritability of ocular traits. Surv Ophthalmol 2010;55(6):561–583
   Google Scholar
• Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Muthen BO, Satorra A. Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociol Meth 1995;25:267–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF, eds. Domain means, regression and multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL. The analysis of discrete longitudinal data: commentary. Statist Med 1988;7:161–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald BW. Estimating logistic regression parameters for bivariate binary data. J Roy Statist Soc Ser 1993;B(55):391–397
   Google Scholar
• Stata Statistical Software [computer program]. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009
   Google Scholar
• AMOS [computer software program]. Crawfordville, FL: SPSS, Inc; 1983–2009
   Google Scholar
• EQS [computer software program]: Multivariate Software, Inc; 1994–2004
   Google Scholar
• LISREL [computer software program]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Mplus [computer software program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2007
   Google Scholar