Effect of ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid during oocyte retrieval on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: a randomised controlled trial (NCT01040351)

References

• AndersenAN, YueZ, MengFJ, PetersenK. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrandellA, WaldenstromU, NilssonL, HambergerL. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrandellA, LindhardA, WaldenstromU, ThorburnJ, JansonPO, HambergerL. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2762–2769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZeynelogluHB, AriciA, OliveDL. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization – embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70:492–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamusE, PonceletC, GoffinetF, WainerB, MerletF, NisandI, PhilippeHJ. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1243–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EytanO, AzemF, GullI, WolmanI, EladD, JaffaAJ. The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2662–2667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeyerWR, CastelbaumAJ, SomkutiS, SagoskinAW, DoyleM, HarrisJE, LesseyBA. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1393–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BildiriciI, BukulmezO, EnsariA, YaraliH, GurganT. A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2422–2426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KontoravdisA, MakrakisE, PantosK, BotsisD, DeligeoroglouE, CreatsasG. Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1642–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheltonKE, ButlerL, TonerJP, OehningerS, MuasherSJ. Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:523–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonNP, MakW, SowterMC. Laparoscopic salpingectomy for women with hydrosalpinges enhances the success of IVF: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2002;17:543–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van VoorhisBJ, SparksAE, SyropCH, StovallDW. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:736–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HurstBS, TuckerKE, AwoniyiCA, SchlaffWD. Hydrosalpinx treated with extended doxycycline does not compromise the success of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:1017–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HitkariJA, SinghSS, ShapiroHM, LeylandN. Essure treatment of hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1663–1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2006;86(5 Suppl 1):S200–S201.
   Google Scholar
• HammadiehN, CoomarasamyA, OlaB, PapaioannouS, AfnanM, SharifK. Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1113–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de WitW, GowrisingCJ, KuikDJ, LensJW, SchatsR. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1696–1701.
   Google Scholar
• AkmanMA, GarciaJE, DamewoodMD, WattsLD, KatzE. Hydrosalpinx affects the implantation of previously cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1013–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatzE, AkmanMA, DamewoodMD, GarciaJE. Deleterious effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 1996;66:122–125.
   Google Scholar
• AboulgharMA, MansourRT, SerourGI, SattarMA, AwadMM, AminY. Transvaginal ultrasonic needle guided aspiration of pelvic inflammatory cystic masses before ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:311–314.
   Google Scholar
• RussellJB, RodriguezZ, KominsJI. The use of transvaginal ultrasound to aspirate bilateral hydrosalpinges prior to in vitro fertilization: a case report. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1991;8:213–214.
   Google Scholar
• ShararaFI, ScottRT, MarutE, QueenanJT Jr. In-vitro fertilization outcome in women with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:526–530.
   Google Scholar
• SowterMC, AkandeVA, WilliamsJA, HullMG. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum Reprod 1997;12:2147–2150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AkmanMA, ErdenHF, BahceciM. Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients. Hum Reprod 2005;20:906–909.
   Google Scholar
• ChienLW, AuHK, XiaoJ, TzengCR. Fluid accumulation within the uterine cavity reduces pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 2002;17:351–356.
   Google Scholar
• DaftaryGS, TaylorHS. Hydrosalpinx fluid diminishes endometrial cell HOXA10 expression. Fertil Steril 2002;78:577–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar