“You are so beautiful”*: Behind women’s attractiveness towards the biology of reproduction: a narrative review

References

• Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 2011;366:1638–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan SH. What is beauty, and why do we care so much about it? Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:66–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh D. Mating strategies of young women: role of physical attractiveness. J Sex Res 2004;41:43–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall AE. Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful? Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:289–97, vii.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Synnott A. The beauty mystique. Facial Plast Surg 2006;22:163–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Casey RJ, Ritter JM. Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of stereotype? Dev Psychol 1987;23:363–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder RM, Sabb FW, Cannon TD, London ED, Jentsch JD, Parker DS, Poldrack RA, et al. Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale. Neuroscience 2009;164:30–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaskoff M, Mesrine S, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC. Endometriosis risk in relation to naevi, freckles and skin sensitivity to sun exposure: the French E3N cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:1143–1153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 2006;57:199–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes G, Sumich A, Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychol Sc 1999;10:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Simmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol 2004;117:313–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest 2003;26:45–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller AP, Swaddle JP. Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Polak M. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Livshits G, Kobyliansky E. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: a review. Hum Biol 1991;63:441–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hönn M, Göz G. The ideal of facial beauty: a review. J Orofac Orthop 2007;68:6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson Y. Skeletal types: key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance. J Gen Orthod 1996;7:7–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Human facial beauty — averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Hum Nat Interdiscip Biosoc Perspect 1993;4:237–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas LG. Age- and sex-related changes in facial proportions. In: Farkas LG, Munro IR. Anthropometric Proportions in Medicine. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1987. pp 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. The evolution of human sexuality. Trends Ecol Evol (Amst) 1996;11:98–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edler RJ. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod 2001;28:159–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith MJ, Perrett DI, Jones BC, Cornwell RE, Moore FR, Feinberg DR, Boothroyd LG, et al. Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proc Biol Sci 2006;273:135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav 2011;40:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2003;78:385–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Dias M, McClelland A. The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgements of female attractiveness. Sex Roles 1998;39:311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher ML, Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. J Cosmet Dermatol 2006;5:190–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J. Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ 1993;306:484–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wass P, Waldenström U, Rössner S, Hellberg D. An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2057–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc Biol Sci 2004;271:1213–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen SB, Børglum JD, Brixen K, Richelsen B. Relationship between sex hormones, body composition and metabolic risk parameters in premenopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;133:200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Crawford CB, Nadeau J, Lindberg T. Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol 1992;13:197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettijohn TF 2nd, Jungeberg BJ. Playboy Playmate curves: changes in facial and body feature preferences across social and economic conditions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2004;30:1186–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden J, Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychol Bull 2005;131:635–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami V, Capario C, Tovee M, Furnham A. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: a cross-cultural study. Eur J Pers 2006;20:69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KL, Cornellisen PL, Tovee MJ. Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 2007;28:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn M. Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Physical activity, body mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology 2002;13:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Stofberg L, Bhattacharya S. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology – a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:433–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyuk E, Seifer DB, Illions E, Grazi RV, Lieman H. Elevated body mass index is associated with lower serum anti-mullerian hormone levels in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve but not with normal ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2364–2368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz SM, Marshall LM, Baird DD. Epidemiologic contributions to understanding the etiology of uterine leiomyomata. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108 Suppl 5:821–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise LA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D, Harlow BL, Stewart EA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Influence of body size and body fat distribution on risk of uterine leiomyomata in U.S. black women. Epidemiology 2005;16:346–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry KL, De Vivo I, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Wise LA, Missmer SA. Anthropometric characteristics and risk of uterine leiomyoma. Epidemiology 2007;18:758–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinke C, Stanesky R. First impressions of female bust size. J Soc Psychol 1980;110:123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitter AG, Lomranz J, Saxe L, Bar-Tal Y. Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. J Soc Psychol 1983;121:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh D, Young RK. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol Sociobiol 1995;16:483–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueguen N. Women’s bust size and men’s courtship solicitation. Body Image 2007;4:386–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallucci P, Branford OA. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. Eye tracking of men’s preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Arch Sex Behav 2011;40:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein IH, Lin TD, McClellan P. Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness. Percept Psychophys 1982;32:495–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwawaki S, Eysenck HJ, Götz KO. A new Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (VAST): II. cross-cultural comparison between England and Japan. Percept Mot Skills 1979;49:859–862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:855–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabási AL. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011;144:986–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings R, Rivard M, Olive DL, Poliquin-Fleury J, Gagné D, Hugo P, Gosselin D. Evaluation of risk factors associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1513–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Marshall LM, Hunter DJ. Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:784–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missmer SA, Spiegelman D, Hankinson SE, Malspeis S, Barbieri RL, Hunter DJ. Natural hair color and the incidence of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006;85:866–870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrero S, Anserini P, Remorgida V, Ragni N. Body mass index in endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;121:94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hediger ML, Hartnett HJ, Louis GM. Association of endometriosis with body size and figure. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1366–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somigliana E, Viganò P, Abbiati A, Gentilini D, Parazzini F, Benaglia L, Vercellini P, Fedele L. ‘Here comes the sun’: pigmentary traits and sun habits in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:728–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitonis AF, Baer HJ, Hankinson SE, Laufer MR, Missmer SA. A prospective study of body size during childhood and early adulthood and the incidence of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1325–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato F, Nishi M, Kudo R, Miyake H. Body fat distribution and uterine leiomyomas. J Epidemiol 1998;8:176–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeda T, Sakata M, Isobe A, Miyake A, Nishimoto F, Ota Y, Kamiura S, Kimura T. Relationship between metabolic syndrome and uterine leiomyomas: a case-control study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;66:14–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandolu V, Singh R, Lidicker J, Harmanli O. BMI and uterine size: is there any relationship? Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010;29:568–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar