Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination

References

• Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, et al. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;77:781–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovitz Z, Grinin V, Rabia R, et al. Assessment of endometrial receptivity for gestation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, using endometrial thickness and the endometrium-myometrium relative echogenicity coefficient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:194–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update 1996;2:323–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Schnitter M, De Geyter M, et al. Prospective evaulation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil Steril 2000;73:106–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper R. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1999;71:147–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Bekavac I, Bjelos D, Kurjak A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:125–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, et al. Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program. A preliminary study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:797–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, et al. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during invitro fertilization using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:765–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, et al. The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 2006;21:164–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raga R, Bonilla-Musoles F, Casan EM, et al. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2851–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercè LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, Troyano J. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome? Fertil Steril 2008;1:111–17
   Google Scholar
• Sterzik K, Grab D, Sasse V, et al. Doppler sonographic findings and their correlation with implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1989;52:825–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer CV, Campbell S, Tan SL, et al. The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1992;57:372–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Soenksen DM, Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1994;62:1004–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini P, Batzofin J, Nelson J, Olive D. Sonographic uterine predictors of pregnancy in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproductive treatments. Fertil Steril 1994;62:815–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, et al. Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flow during stimulated and natural cycles. Fertil Steril 2006;85:721–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navot D, Bergh P, Williams M, et al. An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:408–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remohi J, Gartner B, Gallardo E, et al. Pregnancy and birth rates after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1997;67:717–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessey BA. Assessment of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2011;96:522–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia C, Artini PG, Giulini S, et al. Colour Doppler changes and thromboxane production after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2477–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S. Subendometrial (spiral) artery perfusion in periovulatory period in different induction protocols (CC, HMG, and CC/HMG). Fertil Steril 1993;60:439–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild RL, Knoblock C, Dorn C, et al. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril 2001;75:361–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval Y, Lipitz S, Dor J, Achiron R. The relationship between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1067–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contart P, Baruffi RL, Coelho J, et al. Power Doppler endometrial evaluation as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation in an ICSI program. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:329–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, et al. Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;78:245–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild RL, Holthaus S, d’Alquen J, et al. Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 2000;15:89–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, et al. Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2003;79:507–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, et al. The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1612–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar