The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines

References

• Berg, M., Meulen, R.T. & van den Burg, M. (2001). Guidelines for appropriate care: The importance of empirical normative analysis. Health Care Analysis, 9, 77–99. doi:10.1023/A:101 1307112091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, N.A., Murphy, M.K., Lamping, D.L., McKee, C.M., Sanderson, C.F.B., Askham, J., … Marteau, T. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4, 236–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal Social Psychology, 32, 35–56. doi:10.1002/ejsp.74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, J.S., Bailey, J.V., Klazinga, N., van der Bij, A.K., Grol, R. & Feder, G. (2002). Inside guidelines: Comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care, 25, 1933–1939. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.11.1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, L.M. & Paulus, P.B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071–1080. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzi, A. (2008). Evidence-based medicine and the NHS: A commentary. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101, 342–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, D.A. & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1997). Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: BMJ Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Potts, H.W.W., Wong, G., Bark, P. & Swinglehurst, D. (2009). Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 729–788. doi:10.1111/j. 1468-0009.2009.00578.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grol, R., Dalhuijsen, J., Thomas, S., Veld, C., Rutten, G. & Mokkink, H. (1998). Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. British Medical Journal, 317, 858–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol, R. & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet, 362, 1225–1230. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemingway, H., Chen, R., Junghans, C., Timmis, A., Eldridge, S., Shekelle, P., …Feder, G. (2008). Appropriateness criteria for coronary angiography in angina: Reliability and validity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 221–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M. & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G.H., Dellinger, P., Schünemann, H., Levy, M.M., Kunz, R., …Bion, J. (2008). Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. British Medical Journal, 339, 327–337. doi:10.1136/bmj.a744.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., Morgan, A., Ellis, S., Younger, T., Huntley, J. & Swann, C. (2010). Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science & Medicine, 17, 1056–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N.L. & Tindale, R.S. (2004). Group performance and decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocke, U. (2007). How to improve decision making in small groups: Effects of dissent and training interventions. Small Group Research, 38, 437–468. doi:10.1177/1046496407301974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magjuka, R.J. & Baldwin, T.T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 793–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Berentson-Shaw, J., Pilling, S., Feder, G., Dieppe, P., Raine, R., ...Ellis, S. (2007). Turning evidence into recommendations: Protocol for a study of guideline development groups. Implementation Sci, 29(2). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-29.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S. & Lester, K. (2005). Words matter: Increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 14, 367–370. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Kerschreiter, R., Brodbeck, F.C. & Frey, D. (2008). Social validation in group decision making: Differential effects on the decisional impact of preference-consistent and preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1477–1490. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, T. (2005). Diversity in clinical guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1975–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, T., May, C. & Eccles, M. (2006). A new method of analysis enables a better understanding of clinical practice guideline development processes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1199–1206. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.021.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R.M. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L.L. Thompson, J.M. Levine & D.M. Messick (Eds), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R.L., Argote, L. & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R.S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E.J. Posavac, F.B. Bryant, Y. Suarez Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds), Theory and Research on Small Groups (pp. 37–60. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B.A. (2000). How the group affects the mind: Effects of communication in idea generating groups. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B.A. (2009). Group Performance. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offner, A.K., Kramer, T.J. & Winter, J.P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283–298. doi:10.1177/1046496496272005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliari, C. & Grimshaw, J. (2002). Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 8, 145–153. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00333.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, C.D. & Nelson, N.L. (1999). Discussion and decision: The interrelationship between initial preference distribution and group discussion content. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 87–101. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision-making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918–930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine, R., Sanderson, C., Hutchins, A., Carter, S., Larkin, K. & Black, N. (2004). An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet, 364, 429–437. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16766-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randsley de Moura, G., Leader, T.I., Pelletier, J. & Abrams, D. (2008). Prospects for group processes and intergroup relations research: A review of 70 years’ progress. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 575–596. doi:10.1177/ 1368430208095406.
   Google Scholar
• Rulke, D.L. & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Science, 46, 612–625. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E. & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 40–46. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B.A. & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539–552. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schünemann, H.J. (2011). Guidelines 2.0: Do no net harm – The future of practice guideline development in asthma and other diseases. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 11, 261–268. doi:10.1007/s1182-011-0185-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheldon, T.A., Cullum, N., Dawson, D., Lankshear, A., Lowson, K., Watt, I., …Wright, J. (2004). What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients’ notes and interviews. British Medical Journal, 329, 999–1004. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman, R.N., Shekelle, P., Overhage, J.M., Slutsky, J., Grimshaw, J. & Deshpande, A.M. (2003). Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: A proposal from the conference on guideline standardization. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393–422. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G. & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426–434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. & Reynolds, S. (2000). Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Appraisal. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. (2005). Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S., Burchill, C. & Tillin, F. (2003). The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. American Journal of Critical Care, 12, 527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, S.H. (1998). Do clinical practice guidelines define good medical care? The need for good science and the disclosure of uncertainty when defining ‘best practices’. Chest, 113, 166S–171S. doi:10.1378/chest.113.3_Supplement.166S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J.C., Paterson-Brown, S., Johanson, R., Altman, D.G., Bradburn, M.J. & Fisk, N.M. (1998). Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units. British Medical Journal, 317, 1041–1046.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar