References
- Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C., & Twigg, E. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239–246.
- Bilsker, D., & Goldner, E.M. (2002). Routine outcome measurement by mental health-care providers: Is it worth doing? Lancet, 23,(9346) 360, 1689–1690.
- Burgess, P., Pirkis, J., & Coombs, T. (2015). Routine outcome measurement in Australia. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 264–275.
- Delespaul, P. (2015). ROM in the Netherlands – A focus on benchmarking. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 320–328.
- Drukker, M., Bak, M., Campo, Jà., Driessen, G., Van Os, J., & Delespaul, P. (2010). The cumulative needs for care monitor: A unique monitoring system in the south of the Netherlands. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 475–485.
- Emerencia, A., van der Krieke, L., Sytema, S., Petkov, N., & Aiello, M. (2013). Generating personalized advice for schizophrenia patients. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 58, 23–36.
- Essock, S.M., Olfson, M., & Hogan, M.F. (2015). Current practices for measuring mental health outcomes in the USA: International overview of routine outcome measures in mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 296–305.
- Kisely, S., Adair, C.E., Lin, E., & Marriott, B. (2015). Routine outcome measures in Canada. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 286–295.
- Macdonald, A. (2010). Foreword. In T. Trauer (Ed.) Outcome Measurement in Mental Health. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Macdonald, A.J., Fugard, A.J. (2015). Routine mental health outcome measurement in the UK. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 306–319.
- Puschner, B., Becker, T., Bauer, S. (2015). Routine outcome measures in Germany. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 329–337.
- Roe, D., Gelkopf, M., Gornemann, M.I., Baloush-Kleinman, V., & Shadmi, E. (2015). Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychiatric rehabilitation services in Israel. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 345–353.
- Ruud, T. (2015). Routine outcome measures in Norway: Only partly implemented. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 338–344.
- Smith, M., & Baxendine, S. (2015). Outcome measurement in New Zealand. International Review of Psychiatry. 27, 276–285.
- Thornicroft, G., & Slade, M. (2014). New trends in assessing the outcomes of mental health interventions, World Psychiatry, 13, 118–124.
- van der Krieke L., Emerencia, A.C., Boonstra, N., Wunderink, L., de Jonge, P., & Sytema, S. (2013). A web-based tool to support shared decision making for people with a psychotic disorder: Randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e216.
- Wing, J.K., Beevor, A.S., Curtis, R.H., Park, S.B., Hadden, S., & Burns, A. (1998). Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 11–18.