GSM 900 MHz cellular phone radiation can either stimulate or depress early embryogenesis in Japanese quails depending on the duration of exposure

References

• Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, Sharma R. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in vitro pilot study. Fertility and Sterility 92:1318–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. 2012. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Scientific Reports 2:312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avci B, Akar A, Bilgici B, Tuncel OK. 2012. Oxidative stress induced by 1.8 GHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation and effects of garlic extract in rats. International Journal of Radiation Biology 88:799–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Islami F, Galichet L, Straif K. 2011. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. The Lancet Oncology 12:624–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S, Acer N, Ucok K, Colakoglu S. 2009. 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Research 1265:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behari J, Paulraj R. 2007. Biomarkers of induced electromagnetic field and cancer. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 45:77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev I. 2010. Dependence of non-thermal biological effects of microwaves on physical and biological variables: Implications for reproducibility and safety standards. European Journal of Oncology Library 5:187–217.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2008. Hormesis: Why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27: 1451–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardis E, Deltour I, Vrijheid M, Combalot E, Moissonnier M, Tardy H, et al. 2010. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. International Journal of Epidemiology 39:675–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cespedes O, Ueno S. 2009. Effects of radio frequency magnetic fields on iron release from cage proteins. Bioelectromagnetics 30: 336–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CK, Bassen H, Osepchuk J, Balzano Q, Petersen R, Meltz M, Cleveland R, Lin JC, Heynick L. 1996. Radio frequency electromagnetic exposure: Tutorial review on experimental dosimetry. Bioelectromagnetics 17:195–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. 2009. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 4:e6446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. 2005. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutation Research 583:178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. 2008. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 19:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger H, Hagen K, Lucas B, Vogel P, Voit H. 2004. Influence of the proximity of mobile phone base stations on the incidence of cancer. Environmental Medicine Society 17:273–356.
   Google Scholar
• Einat M, Yahalom A. 2011. Induced static magnetic field by a cellular phone. Applied Physics Letters 99:093503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroshenko G, Vihliantsev S, Kostenko V. 2005. [Biological basics of incubation intensification by electric field]. Paper presented at [Innovation technologies in research and industry], Kamyshin.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, Schiff Y, Seger R. 2007. Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. The Biochemical Journal 405:559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1992. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Developmental Dynamics 195:231–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Sage C. 2008. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 62:104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M. 2009. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. International Journal of Oncology 35: 5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Soderqvist F, Mild KH, Morgan LL. 2007. Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: increased risk associated with use for > or = 10 years. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64:626–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann A, et al. 2003. Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. Mutagenesis 18:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshel DS, DeWitt J, Troutman A. 2003. Using chicken embryos for teratology studies. Current Protocols in Toxicology Chapter 13(Unit 13,14):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland GJ. 2000. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. The Lancet 356:1833–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying elecrtic, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics 74:494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilhan A, Gurel A, Armutcu F, Kamisli S, Iraz M, Akyol O, Ozen S. 2004. Ginkgo biloba prevents mobile phone-induced oxidative stress in rat brain. Clinica Chimica Acta 340:153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. 2011. 900-MHz microwave radiation promotes oxidation in rat brain. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 30:219–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana VG, Teo C, Kundi M, Hardell L, Carlberg M. 2009. Cell phones and brain tumors: A review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surgical Neurology 72:205–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meral I, Mert H, Mert N, Deger Y, Yoruk I, Yetkin A, Keskin S. 2007. Effects of 900-MHz electromagnetic field emitted from cellular phone on brain oxidative stress and some vitamin levels of guinea pigs. Brain Research 1169:120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health of Ukraine. 1996. [State sanitary rules and regulations protect the public from exposure to electromagnetic radiation] in Orders of Ministry of Health of Ukraine, ed. Kyiv.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan LL. 2009. Estimating the risk of brain tumors from cellphone use: Published case-control studies. Pathophysiology 16:137–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozguner F, Altinbas A, Ozaydin M, Dogan A, Vural H, Kisioglu AN, Cesur G, Yildirim NG. 2005. Mobile phone-induced myocardial oxidative stress: Protection by a novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester. Toxicology and Industrial Health 21:223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Margaritis LH. 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna. International Journal of Radiation Biology 86: 345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petek M, Baspinar H, Ogan M. 2003. Effects of egg weight and length of storage on hatchability and subsequent growth performance of quail. South African Journal of Animal Science 33:242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JL, Ivaschuk O, Ishida-Jones T, Jones RA, Campbell-Beachler M, Haggren W. 1998. DNA damage in Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 45:103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BR. 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environmental Health Perspectives 111: 881–883; discussion A408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C, Kratochvil E, Pilger A, Kuster N, Adlkofer F, Rudiger HW. 2008. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 81:755–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. 1988. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 175:184–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart W. 2000. Mobile phones and health. Independent expert group on mobile phone. Available 24 November 2012 at: http://www.iegmp.org.uk/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tsybulin O, Yakymenko I. 2009. [Effect of non-thermal optic electromagnetic radiation on embryo development of quails]. Photobiology and Photomedicine 2:75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Kyrylenko S, Henshel D, Yakymenko I. 2012. GSM 900 MHz microwave radiation affects embryo development of Japanese quails. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 31:75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Vaska P, Fowler JS, Telang F, Alexoff D, Logan J, Wong C. 2011. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. Journal of American Medical Association 305:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakimenko I, Besulin V, Testik A. 2002. The effects of low intensity red laser irradiation on hatching eggs in chicken and quail. International Journal of Poultry Science 1:06–08.
   Google Scholar
• Yakymenko I, Sidorik E, Kyrylenko S, Chekhun V. 2011a. Long-term exposure to microwave radiation provokes cancer growth: Evidences from radars and mobile communication systems. Experimental Oncology 33:62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yakymenko I, Sidorik E, Tsybulin O, Chekhun V. 2011b. [Potential risks of microwaves from mobile phones for youth health]. Environment and Health 56:48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Yakymenko I, Henshel D, Sidorik E, Tsybulin O, Rozumnuk V. 2011c. [Effect of mobile phone electromagnetic radiation on somitogenesis of birds]. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine:146–152.
   Google Scholar