Effect of variable dose rate on biologically effective dose

References

• Aardweg GJ, Hopewell JW. 1992. The kinetics of repair for sublethal radiation-induced damage in the pig epidermis: An interpretation based on a fast and a slow component of repair. Radiotherapy and Oncology 23:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman MB, Chmura SJ, Deasy JO, Roeske JC. 2006. Optimization of the temporal pattern of radiation: An IMRT based study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 66:898–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman MB, Stinauer MA, Javier D, Smith BD, Herman LC, Pytynia ML, Aydogan B, Pelizzari CA, Chmura SJ, Roeske JC. 2009. Validation of temporal optimization effects for a single fraction of radiation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 75:1240–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang KK, Jiang GL, Guttenberger R, Thames HD, Stephens LC, Smith CD, Feng Y. 1992. Impact of spinal cord repair kinetics on the practice of altered fractionation schedules. Radiotherapy and Oncology 25:287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendsen GW. 1982. Dose fractionation, dose rate, and isoeffect relationships for normal tissue responses. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 8:1981–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict SH, Lin PS, Zwicker RD, Huang DT, Schmidt-Ullrich RK. 1997. The biological effectiveness of intermittent irradiation as a function of overall treatment time: Development of correction factors for linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 37:765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, Keall P, Lovelock M, Meeks S, Papiez L, Purdie T, Sadagopan R, Schell MC, Salter B, Schlesinger DJ, Shiu AS, Solberg T, Song DY, Stieber V, Timmerman R, Tomé W A, Verellen D, Wang L, Yin FF. 2010. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101. Medical Physics 37:4078–4101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. 1991. Conditions for the equivalence of continuous and pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 20:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ, Huang Y, Sachs RK. 1994. Optimizing the time course of brachytherapy and other accelerated radiotherapeutic protocols. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 29:893–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Armour E, Corry P, Hall EJ. 1998. Sublethal damage repair times for a late-responding tissue relevant to brachytherapy (and external-beam radiotherapy): Implications for new brachytherapy protocols. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 41:135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ. 2008. The linear-quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction. Seminars in Radiation Oncology 18:234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone M, Wilkins D, Raaphorst P. 2005. The modified linear-quadratic model of Guerrero and Li can be derived from a mechanistic basis and exhibits linear-quadratic-linear behavior. Physics in Medicine and Biology 50:L9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale RG. 1985. The application of the linear-quadratic dose- effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology 58:515–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale RG. 1986The application of the linear-quadratic model to fractionated radiotherapy when there is incomplete normal tissue recovery between fractions, and possible implications for treatments involving multiple fractions per day. British Journal of Radiology 59:919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale RG, Fowler JF, Jones B. 1999. A new incomplete-repair model based on a reciprocal time pattern of sublethal damage repair. Acta Oncologica 38:919–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham JW, Hamilton CS, Simpson SA, O’Brien MY, Ostwald PM, Kron T, Dear KBG. 1995. Acute reaction parameters for human oropharyngeal mucosa. Radiotherapy and Oncology 35:129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikomey E, Franzke J. 1986. DNA repair kinetics after exposure to x-irradiation and to internal β-rays in CHO cells. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 25:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JF. 2002. Repair between dose fractions: A simpler method of analyzing and reporting apparently biexponential repair. Radiation Research 158:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JF. 1989. The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology 62:679–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JF, Welsh JS, Howard SP. 2004. Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 59:242–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JF. 2010. 21 years of biologically effective dose. British Journal of Radiology 83:554–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero M, Li XA. 2004. Extending the linear-quadratic model for large fraction doses pertinent to stereotactic radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 49:4825–4835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. 2006. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 6th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Iliakis G. 1991. The role of DNA double strand breaks in ionizing radiation-induced killing of eukaryotic cells. Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 13:641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, Short SC, Turesson I. 2001. Low-dose hypersensitivity: Current status and possible mechanisms. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 49:379–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan W. 1991. Advanced calculus. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick JP , Meyer JJ, Marks LB. 2008. The LQ model is inappropriate to model high-dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery. Seminars in Radiation Oncology 18:240–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman VY, Ventura AM, Sommerfeldt M. 2008. Effect of radiation protraction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy with direct aperture optimization: A phantom study. Physics in Medicine and Biology 53:3279–3292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman VY, Spradlin GS. 2011. Use of radiation protraction to escalate biologically effective dose to the treatment target. Medical Physics 38:6553–6560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea DE, Catcheside DG. 1942. The mechanism of the induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations in tradescantia. Journal of Genetics 44:216–245.
   Google Scholar
• Moiseenko V, Duzenli C, Durand RE. 2007. In vitro study of cell survival following dynamic MLC intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose delivery. Medical Physics 34:1514–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop LAM, Millar WT, Plas M, Skwarchuk MW, Hanssen AE, Kogel AJ. 1997. High dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) interstitial irradiation (IRT) of the rat spinal cord. Radiotherapy and Oncology 42:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop LAM, Millar WT, Plas M, Kogel AJ. 2000. Radiation tolerance of rat spinal cord to pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy: The impact of differences in temporal dose distribution. Radiotherapy and Oncology 55:301–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rongen E, Thames HD, Travis EL. 1993. Recovery from radiation damage in mouse lung: Interpretation in terms of two rates of repair. Radiation Research 133:225–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rongen E, Thames HD, Travis EL. 1995. Repair rate in mouse lung after clinically relevant radiation doses per fraction. Radiation Research 141:74–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibamoto Y, Ito M, Sugie C, Ogino H, Hara M. 2004. Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumors cells: Implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 59:1484–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short SC, Kelly J, Mayes CR, Woodcock M, Joiner MC. 2001. Low-dose hypersensitivity after fractionated low-dose irradiation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Biology 77: 655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LG, Miller RC, Richards M, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. 1999. Investigation of hypersensitivity to fractionated low-dose radiation exposure. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 45:187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel GG, Deacon JM, Duchesne GM, Horwich A, Kelland LR, Peacock JH. 1987. The dose rate effect in human tumour cells. Radiotherapy and Oncology 9:299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames HD. 1985. An ‘incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 47:319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis EL, Thames HD, Watkins TL, Kiss I. 1987. The kinetics of repair in mouse lung after fractionated irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 52:903–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JZ, Li XA, D’Souza WD, Stewart RD. 2003. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: A note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 57:543–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers HR, Taylor JMG, Maciejewski B. 1988. Treatment volume and tissue tolerance. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 14:751–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh JS, Howard SP, Fowler JF. 2003. Dose rate in external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: An overlooked confounding variable?. Urology 62:204–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar