Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by Auger-electron emission

References

• Baró J, Sempau J, Fernández-Varea JM, Salvat F. 1995. PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res B 100:31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr TM, Béhé M, Löhr M, Sgouros G, Angerstein C, Wehrmann E, Nebendahl K, Becker W. 2000. Therapeutic advantages of Auger electron-over β-emitting radiometals or radioiodine when conjugated to internalizing antibodies. Eur J Nucl Med 27:753–765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bousis C. 2011. Dosimetry on sub-cellular level for intracellular incorporated Auger-electron-emitting radionuclides: A comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and analytic calculations. Radiat Protect Dosim 143:33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousis C, Emfietzoglou D, Hadjidoukas P, Nikjoo H. 2010. Monte Carlo single-cell dosimetry of Auger-electron-emitting radionuclides. Phys Med Biol 55:2555–2572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd M, Ross SC, Dorrens J, Fullerton NE, Tan KW, Zalutsky MR, Mairs RJ. 2006. Radiation-induced biologic bystander effect elicited in vitro by targeted radiopharmaceuticals labeled with alpha-, beta-, and Auger electron-emitting radionuclides. J Nucl Med 47:1007–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Pignol JP, Chan C, Reilly RM. 2010. Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle computer code: Comparison with analytic methods and correlation with in vitro cytotoxicity. J Nucl Med 51:462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello A, Krenning EP, Breeman WA, Bernard BF, de Jong M. 2003. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in vitro using [111In-DTPA0]octreotide. J Nucl Med 44:98–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson DJ, Stewart RD, Semenenko VA, Sandison GA. 2008. Combined use of Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations and deterministic repair models to examine putative mechanisms of cell killing. Radiat Res 169:447–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion C, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Hindié E. 2008. CELLDOSE: A Monte Carlo code to assess electron dose distribution-S values for 131I in spheres of various sizes. J Nucl Med 49:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan C, Cai Z, Su R, Reilly RM. 2010. 111In- or 99mTc-labeled recombinant VEGF bioconjugates: In vitro evaluation of their cytotoxicity on porcine aortic endothelial cells overexpressing Flt-1 receptors. Nucl Med Biol 37:105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J. 2008. A compilation of microdosimetry for uniformly distributed Auger emitters used in medicine. Int J Radiat Biol 84: 1027–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini DL, Chan C, Cai Z, Vallis KA, Reilly RM. 2007. (111)In-labeled trastuzumab (Herceptin) modified with nuclear localization sequences (NLS): An Auger electron-emitting radiotherapeutic agent for HER2/neu-amplified breast cancer. J Nucl Med 48:1357–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini DL, Villani DF, Vallis KA, Reilly RM. 2010. Methotrexate, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin radiosensitize HER2-amplified human breast cancer cells to the Auger electron-emitting radiotherapeutic agent (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab. J Nucl Med 51:477–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerman KF, Endo A. 2008. MIRD: Radionuclide data and decay schemes. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Elmroth K, Stenerlöw B. 2005. DNA-incorporated 125I induces more than one double-strand break per decay in mammalian cells. Radiat Res 163:369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraggi M, Gardin I, Stievenart JL, Bok BD, Le Guludec D. 1998. Comparison of cellular and conventional dosimetry in assessing self-dose and cross-dose delivered to the cell nucleus by electron emissions of 99mTC, 123I, 111In, 67Ga and 201T1. Eur J Nucl Med 25:205–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedland W, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Ottolenghi A, Ballarini F, Liotta M. 2006. Simulation of light ion induced DNA damage patterns. Radiat Protect Dosim 122:116–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ftácniková S, Böhm R. 2000. Monte Carlo calculations of energy deposition in DNA for Auger emitters. Radiat Protect Dosim 92: 269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakilas AG, O’Neill P, Stewart RD. 2013. Induction and repair of clustered DNA lesions: What do we know so far?Radiat Res 180:100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddu SM, Howell RW, Bouchet LG, Bolch WE, Rao DV. 1997. MIRD cellular S values. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Goddu SM, Howell RW, Rao DV. 1994. Cellular dosimetry: Absorbed fractions for monoenergetic electron and alpha particle sources and S-values for radionuclides uniformly distributed in different cell compartments. J Nucl Med 35:303–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper JV, Anderson JA, O’Neill P. 2010. Radiation induced DNA DSBs: Contribution from stalled replication forks?DNA Rep 9:907–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer KG. 2000. Biophysical aspects of Auger process. Acta Oncolog 39:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell RW. 1992. Radiation spectra for Auger-electron-emitting radionuclides: Report No. 2 of AAPM Nuclear Medicine Task Group No. 6. Med Phys 19:1371–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell RW. 2008. Auger processes in the 21st century. Int J Radiat Biol 84:959–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao Y, Stewart RD. 2008. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes. Phys Med Biol 53:233–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humm JL, Charlton DE. 1989. A new calculational method to assess the therapeutic potential of Auger electron emission. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns HE, Cunningham JR. 1983. The physics of radiology. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Karnas SJ, Moiseenko VV, Yu E, Truong P, Battista JJ. 2001. Monte Carlo simulations and measurement of DNA damage from x-ray-triggered Auger cascades in iododeoxyuridine (IudR). Radiat Environ Biophys 40:199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassis AI. 2004. The amazing world of Auger electrons. Int J Radiat Biol 80:789–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassis AI. 2008. Therapeutic radionuclides: Biophysical and radiobiologic principles. Sem Nucl Med 38:358–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobachevsky PN, Martin RF. 2004. Plasmid DNA breakage by decay of DNA-associated Auger emitters: Experiments with 123I/125I-iodoHoechst 33258. Int J Radiat Biol 80:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. 1991. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations, revised edition. New York: The Society of Nuclear Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Neshasteh-Riz A, Mairs RJ, Angerson WJ, Stanton PD, Reeves JR, Rampling R, Owens J, Wheldon TE. 1998. Differential cytotoxicity of [123I]IUdR, [125I]IUdR and [131I]IUdR to human glioma cells in monolayer or spheroid culture: Effect of proliferative heterogeneity and radiation cross-fire. Br J Cancer 77:385–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Emfietzoglou D, Charlton DE. 2008. The Auger effect in physical and biological research. Int J Radiat Biol 84:1011–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Girard P, Charlton DE, Hofer KG, Laughton CA. 2006. Auger electrons – a nanoprobe for structural, molecular and cellular process. Radiat Protect Dosim 122:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT. 1991. Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low-energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiations. Phys Med Biol 36:229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Goodhead DT, Terrissol M. 1997. Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events. Int J Radiat Biol 71:467–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Terrissol M, Goodhead DT. 1999. Quantitative modelling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method. Radiat Environ Biophys 38:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT. 2001. Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 156:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue JA, Wheldon TE. 1996. Target radiotherapy using Auger electron emitters. Phys Med Biol 41:1973–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papiez L, Battista JJ. 1994. Radiance and particle fluence. Phys Med Biol 39:1053–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Pomplun E. 1991. A new DNA target model for track structure calculations and its first application to I-125 Auger electrons. Int J Radiat Biol 59:625–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomplun E, Terrissol M. 1994. Low-energy electrons inside active DNA models: A tool to elucidate the radiation action mechanisms. Radiat Environ Biophys 33:279–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reniers B, Liu D, Rusch T, Verhaegen F. 2008. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness of a low-energy electronic brachytherapy source. Phys Med Biol 53:7125–7135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz M. 2006. Dose response of biological systems to low- and high-LET radiation. In: Horowitz Y, editor. Microdosimetric response of physical and biological systems to low- and high-LET radiations. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz M, Kraft G. 2004. The physical and radiobiological basis of the local effect model: A response to the commentary by R. Katz. Radiat Res 161:612–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Semenenko VA, Stewart RD. 2004. A fast Monte Carlo algorithm to simulate the spectrum of DNA damages formed by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 161:451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenenko VA, Stewart RD. 2006. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys Med Biol 51:1693–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sempau J, Acosta E, Baró J, Fernández-Varea JM, Salvat F. 1997. An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 132:377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RD, Wilson WE, McDonald JC, Strom DJ. 2002. Microdosimetric properties of ionizing electrons in water: A test of the PENELOPE code system. Phys Med Biol 47:79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RD, Yu VK, Georgakilas AG. 2011. Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death. Radiat Res 176:587–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RD. 2013. Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) software. Available from: http://faculty.washington.edu/trawets/mcds/table1.html
   Google Scholar
• Tavares AA, Tavares JM. 2010. Evaluating 99mTc Auger electrons for targeted tumor radiotherapy by computational methods. Med Phys 37:3551–3559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrissol M, Peudon A, Kummerle E, Pomplun E. 2008. On the biological efficiency of I-123 and I-125 decay on the molecular level. Int J Radiat Biol 84:1063–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thisgaard H, Jensen M. 2008. 119Sb: A potent Auger emitter for targeted radionuclide therapy. Med Phys 35:3839–3846.
   Google Scholar
• Tomita H, Kai M, Kusama T, Aoki Y, Ito A. 1994. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA strand breaks induced by monoenergetic electrons using higher-order structure models of DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 66:669–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung CJ, Ritchie RH. 1977. Electron slowing-down spectra in aluminum metal. Phys Rev B 16:4302–4313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel F, Locquet JP, Nuyts S. 2010. Beam energy considerations for gold nano-particle enhanced radiation treatment. Phys Med Biol 55:4509–4520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JF. 1995. Radiation mutagenesis: The initial DNA lesions responsible. Radiat Res 142:362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt DE. 1996. Quantities for dosimetry of ionizing radiations in liquid water. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Xue LY, Butler NJ, Makrigiorgos GM, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI. 2002. Bystander effect produced by radiolabeled tumor cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13765–13770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui L, Hughes A, DeSombre E. 2001. Relative biological effectiveness of accumulated 125IdU and 125I-estrogen decays in estrogen receptor-expressing MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Radiat Res 155:328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar